加纳验光师的低视力实践和服务提供情况:全国调查。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2024.2317816
Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo, Isaiah Osei Duah Junior, Eldrick Adu Acquah, Elna Abadua Mensah, Albert Kwadjo Amoah Andoh, David Ben Kumah, Bridget Senya Boateng, Josephine Ampomah Boateng, Kofi Osei-Poku, Werner Eisenbarth
{"title":"加纳验光师的低视力实践和服务提供情况:全国调查。","authors":"Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo, Isaiah Osei Duah Junior, Eldrick Adu Acquah, Elna Abadua Mensah, Albert Kwadjo Amoah Andoh, David Ben Kumah, Bridget Senya Boateng, Josephine Ampomah Boateng, Kofi Osei-Poku, Werner Eisenbarth","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2317816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize practice patterns of low vision services among Optometrists in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The nationwide cross-sectional survey identified entities through the Ghana Optometrists Association (GOA) registry and utilized a semi-structured questionnaire to consolidate survey information that comprises practitioners' demographics, available services, diagnostic equipment, barriers to service provision and utilization, and interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>300 Optometrists were identified, with 213 surveyed (71% response rate). About fifty percent (52.6%) were in private practice, and more than two-thirds (77%) did not provide low vision services. Most (≥70%) reported lack of assistive devices, and basic eye care examination kits as the main barriers to low vision service provision. Similarly, practitioners reported unawareness of the presence of low vision centres (76.1%), and high cost of low vision aids (75.1%) as the prime perceived barriers for patients to utilize low vision services. Continuous professional development and public education (89-90%) were suggested as interventions to improve the uptake of low vision services. After statistical adjustment, private facility type (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and lack of basic eye examination kits (AOR = 0.32, <i>p</i> = 0.002) were significantly associated with reduced odds of low vision service provision. Conversely, ≥15 years of work experience (AOR = 6.37, <i>p</i> = 0.011) was significantly associated with increased odds of low vision service provision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the results indicate inadequate low vision coverage and service delivery. Government policies must be directed towards equipping practitioners with equipment and subsidize patient cost of treatment to optimize low vision care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Vision Practice and Service Provision Among Optometrists in Ghana: A Nationwide Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo, Isaiah Osei Duah Junior, Eldrick Adu Acquah, Elna Abadua Mensah, Albert Kwadjo Amoah Andoh, David Ben Kumah, Bridget Senya Boateng, Josephine Ampomah Boateng, Kofi Osei-Poku, Werner Eisenbarth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09286586.2024.2317816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize practice patterns of low vision services among Optometrists in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The nationwide cross-sectional survey identified entities through the Ghana Optometrists Association (GOA) registry and utilized a semi-structured questionnaire to consolidate survey information that comprises practitioners' demographics, available services, diagnostic equipment, barriers to service provision and utilization, and interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>300 Optometrists were identified, with 213 surveyed (71% response rate). About fifty percent (52.6%) were in private practice, and more than two-thirds (77%) did not provide low vision services. Most (≥70%) reported lack of assistive devices, and basic eye care examination kits as the main barriers to low vision service provision. Similarly, practitioners reported unawareness of the presence of low vision centres (76.1%), and high cost of low vision aids (75.1%) as the prime perceived barriers for patients to utilize low vision services. Continuous professional development and public education (89-90%) were suggested as interventions to improve the uptake of low vision services. After statistical adjustment, private facility type (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and lack of basic eye examination kits (AOR = 0.32, <i>p</i> = 0.002) were significantly associated with reduced odds of low vision service provision. Conversely, ≥15 years of work experience (AOR = 6.37, <i>p</i> = 0.011) was significantly associated with increased odds of low vision service provision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the results indicate inadequate low vision coverage and service delivery. Government policies must be directed towards equipping practitioners with equipment and subsidize patient cost of treatment to optimize low vision care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2317816\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2317816","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解加纳验光师的低视力服务实践模式:方法:通过加纳验光师协会(GOA)的登记册在全国范围内进行横断面调查,并利用半结构式问卷调查来整合调查信息,其中包括从业人员的人口统计、现有服务、诊断设备、提供和利用服务的障碍以及干预措施:共确定了 300 名验光师,其中 213 名接受了调查(回复率为 71%)。约 50%(52.6%)的验光师为私人执业,超过三分之二(77%)的验光师不提供低视力服务。大部分(≥70%)受訪者表示,缺乏輔助儀器及基本眼科檢查工具是提供低視能服務的主要障礙。同樣地,從業員表示不知道有低視能中心(76.1%)及低視能助視器價格昂貴(75.1%)是病人使用低視能服務的主要障礙。研究建議持續專業發展及公眾教育(89-90%)作為改善低視能服務的介入措施。经过统计调整后,私人设施类型(调整后的几率比 [AOR] = 0.35,p = 0.010)和缺乏基本眼科检查工具包(AOR = 0.32,p = 0.002)与提供低视力服务的几率降低有显著关系。相反,≥15 年的工作经验(AOR = 6.37,p = 0.011)与提供低视力服务的几率增加明显相关:总体而言,研究结果表明低视力覆盖率和服务提供不足。政府必须制定相关政策,为从业人员配备设备,并补贴患者的治疗费用,以优化低视力保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low Vision Practice and Service Provision Among Optometrists in Ghana: A Nationwide Survey.

Purpose: To characterize practice patterns of low vision services among Optometrists in Ghana.

Methods: The nationwide cross-sectional survey identified entities through the Ghana Optometrists Association (GOA) registry and utilized a semi-structured questionnaire to consolidate survey information that comprises practitioners' demographics, available services, diagnostic equipment, barriers to service provision and utilization, and interventions.

Results: 300 Optometrists were identified, with 213 surveyed (71% response rate). About fifty percent (52.6%) were in private practice, and more than two-thirds (77%) did not provide low vision services. Most (≥70%) reported lack of assistive devices, and basic eye care examination kits as the main barriers to low vision service provision. Similarly, practitioners reported unawareness of the presence of low vision centres (76.1%), and high cost of low vision aids (75.1%) as the prime perceived barriers for patients to utilize low vision services. Continuous professional development and public education (89-90%) were suggested as interventions to improve the uptake of low vision services. After statistical adjustment, private facility type (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35, p = 0.010) and lack of basic eye examination kits (AOR = 0.32, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with reduced odds of low vision service provision. Conversely, ≥15 years of work experience (AOR = 6.37, p = 0.011) was significantly associated with increased odds of low vision service provision.

Conclusions: Overall, the results indicate inadequate low vision coverage and service delivery. Government policies must be directed towards equipping practitioners with equipment and subsidize patient cost of treatment to optimize low vision care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信