教育领域的软机器人实验:2006 年至 2022 年系统文献综述

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Israel Ulises Cayetano-Jiménez;Erick Axel Martinez-Ríos;Rogelio Bustamante-Bello;Ricardo A. Ramírez-Mendoza;María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya
{"title":"教育领域的软机器人实验:2006 年至 2022 年系统文献综述","authors":"Israel Ulises Cayetano-Jiménez;Erick Axel Martinez-Ríos;Rogelio Bustamante-Bello;Ricardo A. Ramírez-Mendoza;María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya","doi":"10.1109/TLT.2024.3372894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational robotics (ER) is a discipline of applied robotics focused on teaching robot design, analysis, application, and operation. Traditionally, ER has favored rigid robots, overlooking the potential of soft robots (SRs). While rigid robots offer insights into dynamics, kinematics, and control, they have limitations in exploring the depths of mechanical design and material properties. In this regard, SRs present an opportunity to expand educational topics and activities in robotics through their unique bioinspired properties and accessibility. Despite their promise, there is a notable lack of research on SRs as educational tools, limiting the identification of research avenues that could promote their adoption in educational settings. This study conducts a systematic literature review to elucidate the impact of SRs across academic levels, pedagogical strategies, prevalent artificial muscles, educational activities, and assessment methods. The findings indicate a significant focus on K-12 workshops utilizing soft pneumatic actuators. Furthermore, SRs have fostered the development of fabrication and mechanical design skills beyond mere programming tasks. However, there is a shortage of studies analyzing their use in higher education or their impact on learning outcomes, suggesting a critical need for comprehensive evaluations to determine their effectiveness, rather than solely relying on surveys for student feedback. Thus, there is an opportunity to explore and evaluate the use of SRs in more advanced settings and multidisciplinary activities, urging for rigorous assessments of their influence on learning outcomes. By undertaking this, we aim to provide a foundation for integrating SRs into the ER curriculum, potentially transforming teaching methodologies and enriching students' learning experiences.","PeriodicalId":49191,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","volume":"17 ","pages":"1261-1278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10460415","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimenting With Soft Robotics in Education: A Systematic Literature Review From 2006 to 2022\",\"authors\":\"Israel Ulises Cayetano-Jiménez;Erick Axel Martinez-Ríos;Rogelio Bustamante-Bello;Ricardo A. Ramírez-Mendoza;María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TLT.2024.3372894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Educational robotics (ER) is a discipline of applied robotics focused on teaching robot design, analysis, application, and operation. Traditionally, ER has favored rigid robots, overlooking the potential of soft robots (SRs). While rigid robots offer insights into dynamics, kinematics, and control, they have limitations in exploring the depths of mechanical design and material properties. In this regard, SRs present an opportunity to expand educational topics and activities in robotics through their unique bioinspired properties and accessibility. Despite their promise, there is a notable lack of research on SRs as educational tools, limiting the identification of research avenues that could promote their adoption in educational settings. This study conducts a systematic literature review to elucidate the impact of SRs across academic levels, pedagogical strategies, prevalent artificial muscles, educational activities, and assessment methods. The findings indicate a significant focus on K-12 workshops utilizing soft pneumatic actuators. Furthermore, SRs have fostered the development of fabrication and mechanical design skills beyond mere programming tasks. However, there is a shortage of studies analyzing their use in higher education or their impact on learning outcomes, suggesting a critical need for comprehensive evaluations to determine their effectiveness, rather than solely relying on surveys for student feedback. Thus, there is an opportunity to explore and evaluate the use of SRs in more advanced settings and multidisciplinary activities, urging for rigorous assessments of their influence on learning outcomes. By undertaking this, we aim to provide a foundation for integrating SRs into the ER curriculum, potentially transforming teaching methodologies and enriching students' learning experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1261-1278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10460415\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10460415/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10460415/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育机器人学(ER)是应用机器人学的一门学科,侧重于机器人设计、分析、应用和操作的教学。传统上,教育机器人学偏爱刚性机器人,忽视了软体机器人(SR)的潜力。虽然刚性机器人能提供动力学、运动学和控制方面的见解,但在探索机械设计和材料特性的深度方面却有局限性。在这方面,软体机器人通过其独特的生物启发特性和易用性,为拓展机器人学的教育主题和活动提供了机会。尽管SRs大有可为,但有关SRs作为教育工具的研究却明显不足,这就限制了研究途径的确定,从而无法促进SRs在教育环境中的应用。本研究进行了系统的文献综述,以阐明人造肌肉对不同学术水平、教学策略、流行的人造肌肉、教育活动和评估方法的影响。研究结果表明,利用软气动致动器的 K-12 研讨班受到了极大关注。此外,除了单纯的编程任务外,SR 还促进了制造和机械设计技能的发展。然而,缺乏对其在高等教育中的使用或对学习成果的影响进行分析的研究,这表明迫切需要进行全面评估,以确定其有效性,而不是仅仅依靠调查来获得学生的反馈。因此,我们有机会探索和评估在更高级的环境和多学科活动中使用员工代表的情况,敦促严格评估其对学习成果的影响。通过开展这项工作,我们旨在为将员工代表纳入企业资源规划课程奠定基础,从而有可能改变教学方法,丰富学生的学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimenting With Soft Robotics in Education: A Systematic Literature Review From 2006 to 2022
Educational robotics (ER) is a discipline of applied robotics focused on teaching robot design, analysis, application, and operation. Traditionally, ER has favored rigid robots, overlooking the potential of soft robots (SRs). While rigid robots offer insights into dynamics, kinematics, and control, they have limitations in exploring the depths of mechanical design and material properties. In this regard, SRs present an opportunity to expand educational topics and activities in robotics through their unique bioinspired properties and accessibility. Despite their promise, there is a notable lack of research on SRs as educational tools, limiting the identification of research avenues that could promote their adoption in educational settings. This study conducts a systematic literature review to elucidate the impact of SRs across academic levels, pedagogical strategies, prevalent artificial muscles, educational activities, and assessment methods. The findings indicate a significant focus on K-12 workshops utilizing soft pneumatic actuators. Furthermore, SRs have fostered the development of fabrication and mechanical design skills beyond mere programming tasks. However, there is a shortage of studies analyzing their use in higher education or their impact on learning outcomes, suggesting a critical need for comprehensive evaluations to determine their effectiveness, rather than solely relying on surveys for student feedback. Thus, there is an opportunity to explore and evaluate the use of SRs in more advanced settings and multidisciplinary activities, urging for rigorous assessments of their influence on learning outcomes. By undertaking this, we aim to provide a foundation for integrating SRs into the ER curriculum, potentially transforming teaching methodologies and enriching students' learning experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies covers all advances in learning technologies and their applications, including but not limited to the following topics: innovative online learning systems; intelligent tutors; educational games; simulation systems for education and training; collaborative learning tools; learning with mobile devices; wearable devices and interfaces for learning; personalized and adaptive learning systems; tools for formative and summative assessment; tools for learning analytics and educational data mining; ontologies for learning systems; standards and web services that support learning; authoring tools for learning materials; computer support for peer tutoring; learning via computer-mediated inquiry, field, and lab work; social learning techniques; social networks and infrastructures for learning and knowledge sharing; and creation and management of learning objects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信