Pia E. Niemelä , Hanna A. Leppänen , Ari Voutilainen , Essi M. Möykkynen , Kirsi A. Virtanen , Anu A. Ruusunen , Reeta M. Rintamäki
{"title":"胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者饮食失调症状的发生率:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Pia E. Niemelä , Hanna A. Leppänen , Ari Voutilainen , Essi M. Möykkynen , Kirsi A. Virtanen , Anu A. Ruusunen , Reeta M. Rintamäki","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms (EDS) in 16 years and older individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes including both clinical and subclinical eating disorder symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases to discover studies reporting prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (both type 1 and type 2). We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms and an independent meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of insulin omission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis of eating disorder symptoms. Diabetes Eating Problem Survey (DEPS-R) was the most frequently used screening tool (in 43 % of studies, <em>n</em> = 20). The pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms was 24 % (95 % CI 0.21–0.28), whereas in studies using DEPS-R, it was slightly higher, 27 % (95 % CI 0.24–0.31), with the prevalence ratio (PR) of 1.1. The prevalence differed between screening tools (χ<sup>2</sup> = 85.83, df = 8, <em>p</em> < .0001). The sex distribution was associated with the observed prevalences; in studies with a higher female prevalence (>58 %), the pooled eating disorder symptom prevalence was higher [30 % (95 % CI 0.26–0.34) vs. 18 % (95 % Cl 0.14–0.22), PR 1.7]. The prevalence of insulin omission was 21 % (95 % CI 0.13–0.33).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Eating disorder symptoms and insulin omission are common in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes regardless of age. DEPS-R is the most used screening tool. Studies with a higher proportion of female participants report higher prevalence rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000229/pdfft?md5=4baa3eaa31c6a2d44e17cf06af4c73ec&pid=1-s2.0-S1471015324000229-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in people with insulin-dependent-diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Pia E. Niemelä , Hanna A. Leppänen , Ari Voutilainen , Essi M. Möykkynen , Kirsi A. Virtanen , Anu A. Ruusunen , Reeta M. Rintamäki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms (EDS) in 16 years and older individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes including both clinical and subclinical eating disorder symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases to discover studies reporting prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (both type 1 and type 2). We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms and an independent meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of insulin omission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis of eating disorder symptoms. Diabetes Eating Problem Survey (DEPS-R) was the most frequently used screening tool (in 43 % of studies, <em>n</em> = 20). The pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms was 24 % (95 % CI 0.21–0.28), whereas in studies using DEPS-R, it was slightly higher, 27 % (95 % CI 0.24–0.31), with the prevalence ratio (PR) of 1.1. The prevalence differed between screening tools (χ<sup>2</sup> = 85.83, df = 8, <em>p</em> < .0001). The sex distribution was associated with the observed prevalences; in studies with a higher female prevalence (>58 %), the pooled eating disorder symptom prevalence was higher [30 % (95 % CI 0.26–0.34) vs. 18 % (95 % Cl 0.14–0.22), PR 1.7]. The prevalence of insulin omission was 21 % (95 % CI 0.13–0.33).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Eating disorder symptoms and insulin omission are common in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes regardless of age. DEPS-R is the most used screening tool. Studies with a higher proportion of female participants report higher prevalence rates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000229/pdfft?md5=4baa3eaa31c6a2d44e17cf06af4c73ec&pid=1-s2.0-S1471015324000229-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
方法我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库,以发现报道胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(1型和2型)患者饮食失调症状(EDS)患病率的研究。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以估算饮食失调症状的总体患病率,并进行了一项独立的荟萃分析,以估算胰岛素遗漏的患病率。糖尿病饮食问题调查(DEPS-R)是最常用的筛查工具(43%的研究,n = 20)。饮食失调症状的汇总患病率为 24% (95 % CI 0.21-0.28),而在使用 DEPS-R 的研究中,患病率略高,为 27% (95 % CI 0.24-0.31),患病率比 (PR) 为 1.1。不同筛查工具的患病率存在差异(χ2 = 85.83, df = 8, p <.0001)。性别分布与观察到的患病率有关;在女性患病率较高(58%)的研究中,汇总的进食障碍症状患病率较高 [30 % (95 % CI 0.26-0.34) vs. 18 % (95 % Cl 0.14-0.22), PR 1.7]。结论饮食失调症状和胰岛素遗漏在胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中很常见,与年龄无关。DEPS-R是最常用的筛查工具。女性参与者比例较高的研究报告了较高的患病率。
Prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in people with insulin-dependent-diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Aims
To examine the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms (EDS) in 16 years and older individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes including both clinical and subclinical eating disorder symptoms.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases to discover studies reporting prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (both type 1 and type 2). We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms and an independent meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of insulin omission.
Results
A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis of eating disorder symptoms. Diabetes Eating Problem Survey (DEPS-R) was the most frequently used screening tool (in 43 % of studies, n = 20). The pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms was 24 % (95 % CI 0.21–0.28), whereas in studies using DEPS-R, it was slightly higher, 27 % (95 % CI 0.24–0.31), with the prevalence ratio (PR) of 1.1. The prevalence differed between screening tools (χ2 = 85.83, df = 8, p < .0001). The sex distribution was associated with the observed prevalences; in studies with a higher female prevalence (>58 %), the pooled eating disorder symptom prevalence was higher [30 % (95 % CI 0.26–0.34) vs. 18 % (95 % Cl 0.14–0.22), PR 1.7]. The prevalence of insulin omission was 21 % (95 % CI 0.13–0.33).
Conclusions
Eating disorder symptoms and insulin omission are common in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes regardless of age. DEPS-R is the most used screening tool. Studies with a higher proportion of female participants report higher prevalence rates.