胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者饮食失调症状的发生率:系统回顾与荟萃分析

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Pia E. Niemelä , Hanna A. Leppänen , Ari Voutilainen , Essi M. Möykkynen , Kirsi A. Virtanen , Anu A. Ruusunen , Reeta M. Rintamäki
{"title":"胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者饮食失调症状的发生率:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Pia E. Niemelä ,&nbsp;Hanna A. Leppänen ,&nbsp;Ari Voutilainen ,&nbsp;Essi M. Möykkynen ,&nbsp;Kirsi A. Virtanen ,&nbsp;Anu A. Ruusunen ,&nbsp;Reeta M. Rintamäki","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms (EDS) in 16 years and older individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes including both clinical and subclinical eating disorder symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases to discover studies reporting prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (both type 1 and type 2). We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms and an independent meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of insulin omission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis of eating disorder symptoms. Diabetes Eating Problem Survey (DEPS-R) was the most frequently used screening tool (in 43 % of studies, <em>n</em> = 20). The pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms was 24 % (95 % CI 0.21–0.28), whereas in studies using DEPS-R, it was slightly higher, 27 % (95 % CI 0.24–0.31), with the prevalence ratio (PR) of 1.1. The prevalence differed between screening tools (χ<sup>2</sup> = 85.83, df = 8, <em>p</em> &lt; .0001). The sex distribution was associated with the observed prevalences; in studies with a higher female prevalence (&gt;58 %), the pooled eating disorder symptom prevalence was higher [30 % (95 % CI 0.26–0.34) vs. 18 % (95 % Cl 0.14–0.22), PR 1.7]. The prevalence of insulin omission was 21 % (95 % CI 0.13–0.33).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Eating disorder symptoms and insulin omission are common in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes regardless of age. DEPS-R is the most used screening tool. Studies with a higher proportion of female participants report higher prevalence rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000229/pdfft?md5=4baa3eaa31c6a2d44e17cf06af4c73ec&pid=1-s2.0-S1471015324000229-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in people with insulin-dependent-diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Pia E. Niemelä ,&nbsp;Hanna A. Leppänen ,&nbsp;Ari Voutilainen ,&nbsp;Essi M. Möykkynen ,&nbsp;Kirsi A. Virtanen ,&nbsp;Anu A. Ruusunen ,&nbsp;Reeta M. Rintamäki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms (EDS) in 16 years and older individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes including both clinical and subclinical eating disorder symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases to discover studies reporting prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (both type 1 and type 2). We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms and an independent meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of insulin omission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis of eating disorder symptoms. Diabetes Eating Problem Survey (DEPS-R) was the most frequently used screening tool (in 43 % of studies, <em>n</em> = 20). The pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms was 24 % (95 % CI 0.21–0.28), whereas in studies using DEPS-R, it was slightly higher, 27 % (95 % CI 0.24–0.31), with the prevalence ratio (PR) of 1.1. The prevalence differed between screening tools (χ<sup>2</sup> = 85.83, df = 8, <em>p</em> &lt; .0001). The sex distribution was associated with the observed prevalences; in studies with a higher female prevalence (&gt;58 %), the pooled eating disorder symptom prevalence was higher [30 % (95 % CI 0.26–0.34) vs. 18 % (95 % Cl 0.14–0.22), PR 1.7]. The prevalence of insulin omission was 21 % (95 % CI 0.13–0.33).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Eating disorder symptoms and insulin omission are common in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes regardless of age. DEPS-R is the most used screening tool. Studies with a higher proportion of female participants report higher prevalence rates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000229/pdfft?md5=4baa3eaa31c6a2d44e17cf06af4c73ec&pid=1-s2.0-S1471015324000229-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库,以发现报道胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(1型和2型)患者饮食失调症状(EDS)患病率的研究。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以估算饮食失调症状的总体患病率,并进行了一项独立的荟萃分析,以估算胰岛素遗漏的患病率。糖尿病饮食问题调查(DEPS-R)是最常用的筛查工具(43%的研究,n = 20)。饮食失调症状的汇总患病率为 24% (95 % CI 0.21-0.28),而在使用 DEPS-R 的研究中,患病率略高,为 27% (95 % CI 0.24-0.31),患病率比 (PR) 为 1.1。不同筛查工具的患病率存在差异(χ2 = 85.83, df = 8, p <.0001)。性别分布与观察到的患病率有关;在女性患病率较高(58%)的研究中,汇总的进食障碍症状患病率较高 [30 % (95 % CI 0.26-0.34) vs. 18 % (95 % Cl 0.14-0.22), PR 1.7]。结论饮食失调症状和胰岛素遗漏在胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中很常见,与年龄无关。DEPS-R是最常用的筛查工具。女性参与者比例较高的研究报告了较高的患病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in people with insulin-dependent-diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in people with insulin-dependent-diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

To examine the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms (EDS) in 16 years and older individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes including both clinical and subclinical eating disorder symptoms.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases to discover studies reporting prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (both type 1 and type 2). We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms and an independent meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of insulin omission.

Results

A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis of eating disorder symptoms. Diabetes Eating Problem Survey (DEPS-R) was the most frequently used screening tool (in 43 % of studies, n = 20). The pooled prevalence of eating disorder symptoms was 24 % (95 % CI 0.21–0.28), whereas in studies using DEPS-R, it was slightly higher, 27 % (95 % CI 0.24–0.31), with the prevalence ratio (PR) of 1.1. The prevalence differed between screening tools (χ2 = 85.83, df = 8, p < .0001). The sex distribution was associated with the observed prevalences; in studies with a higher female prevalence (>58 %), the pooled eating disorder symptom prevalence was higher [30 % (95 % CI 0.26–0.34) vs. 18 % (95 % Cl 0.14–0.22), PR 1.7]. The prevalence of insulin omission was 21 % (95 % CI 0.13–0.33).

Conclusions

Eating disorder symptoms and insulin omission are common in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes regardless of age. DEPS-R is the most used screening tool. Studies with a higher proportion of female participants report higher prevalence rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信