实施以活动、营养和认知参与为目标的虚弱护理包 (FCB),以减少老年骨科创伤患者与医院有关的衰退:预试验-后试验干预研究》。

Corina Naughton, Marguerite de Foubert, Helen Cummins, Ruth McCullagh, Teresa Wills, Dawn A Skelton, Darren Dahly, Denis O'Mahony, Emer Ahern, Salvatore Tedesco, Bridie O Sullivan
{"title":"实施以活动、营养和认知参与为目标的虚弱护理包 (FCB),以减少老年骨科创伤患者与医院有关的衰退:预试验-后试验干预研究》。","authors":"Corina Naughton, Marguerite de Foubert, Helen Cummins, Ruth McCullagh, Teresa Wills, Dawn A Skelton, Darren Dahly, Denis O'Mahony, Emer Ahern, Salvatore Tedesco, Bridie O Sullivan","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-09-032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To implement and evaluate a Frailty Care Bundle (FCB) targeting mobilisation, nutrition, and cognition in older trauma patients to reduce hospital associated decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a two group, pretest-posttest design. The FCB intervention was delivered on two orthopaedic wards and two rehabilitation wards, guided by behaviour change theory (COM-B) to implement changes in ward routines (patient mobility goals, nurse assisted mobilisation, mealtimes, communication). Primary outcomes were patient participants' return to pre-trauma functional capability (modified Barthel Index - mBI) at 6-8 weeks post-hospital discharge and average hospital daily step-count. Statistical analysis compared pre versus post FCB group differences using ordinal regression and log-linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 120 patients (pre n=60 and post n=60), and 74 (pre n=43, post n=36) were retained at follow-up. Median age was 78 years and 83% were female. There was a non-significant trend for higher mBI scores (improved function) in the post compared to pre FCB group (OR 2.29, 95% CI 0.98-5.36), associated with an average 11% increase in step-count.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was feasible, during the Covid-19 pandemic, for multidisciplinary teams to implement elements of the FCB. Clinical facilitation supported teams to prioritise fundamental care above competing demands, but sustainability requires ongoing attention. ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN15145850 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15145850).</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"9 1","pages":"32-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a Frailty Care Bundle (FCB) Targeting Mobilisation, Nutrition and Cognitive Engagement to Reduce Hospital Associated Decline in Older Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: Pretest-Posttest Intervention Study.\",\"authors\":\"Corina Naughton, Marguerite de Foubert, Helen Cummins, Ruth McCullagh, Teresa Wills, Dawn A Skelton, Darren Dahly, Denis O'Mahony, Emer Ahern, Salvatore Tedesco, Bridie O Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.22540/JFSF-09-032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To implement and evaluate a Frailty Care Bundle (FCB) targeting mobilisation, nutrition, and cognition in older trauma patients to reduce hospital associated decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a two group, pretest-posttest design. The FCB intervention was delivered on two orthopaedic wards and two rehabilitation wards, guided by behaviour change theory (COM-B) to implement changes in ward routines (patient mobility goals, nurse assisted mobilisation, mealtimes, communication). Primary outcomes were patient participants' return to pre-trauma functional capability (modified Barthel Index - mBI) at 6-8 weeks post-hospital discharge and average hospital daily step-count. Statistical analysis compared pre versus post FCB group differences using ordinal regression and log-linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 120 patients (pre n=60 and post n=60), and 74 (pre n=43, post n=36) were retained at follow-up. Median age was 78 years and 83% were female. There was a non-significant trend for higher mBI scores (improved function) in the post compared to pre FCB group (OR 2.29, 95% CI 0.98-5.36), associated with an average 11% increase in step-count.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was feasible, during the Covid-19 pandemic, for multidisciplinary teams to implement elements of the FCB. Clinical facilitation supported teams to prioritise fundamental care above competing demands, but sustainability requires ongoing attention. ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN15145850 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15145850).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"32-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-09-032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-09-032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的实施并评估针对老年外伤患者行动能力、营养和认知能力的虚弱护理包(FCB),以减少与住院相关的衰退:我们采用了两组前测-后测设计。在行为改变理论(COM-B)的指导下,在两间骨科病房和两间康复病房实施 FCB 干预,以改变病房常规(患者移动目标、护士协助移动、进餐时间、沟通)。主要结果是患者在出院后6-8周恢复到创伤前的功能能力(改良巴特尔指数(mBI))和平均住院日步数。统计分析采用了序数回归和对数线性模型,比较了功能锻炼前后的组间差异:我们招募了 120 名患者(入院前为 60 人,入院后为 60 人),其中 74 人(入院前为 43 人,入院后为 36 人)接受了随访。中位年龄为 78 岁,83% 为女性。与接受 FCB 治疗前相比,接受治疗后组的 mBI 得分更高(功能得到改善)(OR 2.29,95% CI 0.98-5.36),与此同时,步数平均增加了 11%:结论:在 Covid-19 大流行期间,多学科团队实施 FCB 是可行的。临床促进支持团队优先考虑基本护理,而不是其他需求,但可持续性需要持续关注。ISRCTN 注册:ISRCTN15145850 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15145850).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a Frailty Care Bundle (FCB) Targeting Mobilisation, Nutrition and Cognitive Engagement to Reduce Hospital Associated Decline in Older Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: Pretest-Posttest Intervention Study.

Objective: To implement and evaluate a Frailty Care Bundle (FCB) targeting mobilisation, nutrition, and cognition in older trauma patients to reduce hospital associated decline.

Methods: We used a two group, pretest-posttest design. The FCB intervention was delivered on two orthopaedic wards and two rehabilitation wards, guided by behaviour change theory (COM-B) to implement changes in ward routines (patient mobility goals, nurse assisted mobilisation, mealtimes, communication). Primary outcomes were patient participants' return to pre-trauma functional capability (modified Barthel Index - mBI) at 6-8 weeks post-hospital discharge and average hospital daily step-count. Statistical analysis compared pre versus post FCB group differences using ordinal regression and log-linear models.

Results: We recruited 120 patients (pre n=60 and post n=60), and 74 (pre n=43, post n=36) were retained at follow-up. Median age was 78 years and 83% were female. There was a non-significant trend for higher mBI scores (improved function) in the post compared to pre FCB group (OR 2.29, 95% CI 0.98-5.36), associated with an average 11% increase in step-count.

Conclusion: It was feasible, during the Covid-19 pandemic, for multidisciplinary teams to implement elements of the FCB. Clinical facilitation supported teams to prioritise fundamental care above competing demands, but sustainability requires ongoing attention. ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN15145850 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15145850).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信