姑息治疗是转移性癌症患者住院期间高价值和节约成本护理的组成部分。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1200/OP.23.00576
Sifan Lu, Eileen Rakovitch, Breffni Hannon, Camilla Zimmermann, Kavita V Dharmarajan, Michael Yan, John R De Almeida, Christopher M K L Yao, Erin F Gillespie, Fumiko Chino, Divya Yerramilli, Ethan Goonaratne, Fadwa Abdel-Rahman, Hiba Othman, Sara Mheid, Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
{"title":"姑息治疗是转移性癌症患者住院期间高价值和节约成本护理的组成部分。","authors":"Sifan Lu, Eileen Rakovitch, Breffni Hannon, Camilla Zimmermann, Kavita V Dharmarajan, Michael Yan, John R De Almeida, Christopher M K L Yao, Erin F Gillespie, Fumiko Chino, Divya Yerramilli, Ethan Goonaratne, Fadwa Abdel-Rahman, Hiba Othman, Sara Mheid, Chiaojung Jillian Tsai","doi":"10.1200/OP.23.00576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that palliative care (PC) can improve quality of life and survival for outpatients with advanced cancer, but there are limited population-based data on the value of inpatient PC. We assessed PC as a component of high-value care among a nationally representative sample of inpatients with metastatic cancer and identified hospitalization characteristics significantly associated with high costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalizations of patients 18 years and older with a primary diagnosis of metastatic cancer from the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to assess medical services, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics associated with higher charges billed to insurance and hospital costs. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to determine cost savings associated with provision of PC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 397,691 hospitalizations from 2010 to 2019, the median charge per admission increased by 24.9%, from $44,904 in US dollars (USD) to $56,098 USD, whereas the median hospital cost remained stable at $14,300 USD. Receipt of inpatient PC was associated with significantly lower charges (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.64]; <i>P</i> < .001) and costs (OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.61]; <i>P</i> < .001). Factors associated with high charges were receipt of invasive medical ventilation (<i>P</i> < .001) or systemic therapy (<i>P</i> < .001), Hispanic patients (<i>P</i> < .001), young age (18-49 years, <i>P</i> < .001), and for-profit hospitals (<i>P</i> < .001). PC provision was associated with a $1,310 USD (-13.6%, <i>P</i> < .001) reduction in costs per hospitalization compared with no PC, independent of the receipt of invasive care and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inpatient PC is associated with reduced hospital costs for patients with metastatic cancer, irrespective of age and receipt of aggressive interventions. Integration of inpatient PC may de-escalate costs incurred through low-value inpatient interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"252-260"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Care as a Component of High-Value and Cost-Saving Care During Hospitalization for Metastatic Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Sifan Lu, Eileen Rakovitch, Breffni Hannon, Camilla Zimmermann, Kavita V Dharmarajan, Michael Yan, John R De Almeida, Christopher M K L Yao, Erin F Gillespie, Fumiko Chino, Divya Yerramilli, Ethan Goonaratne, Fadwa Abdel-Rahman, Hiba Othman, Sara Mheid, Chiaojung Jillian Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP.23.00576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that palliative care (PC) can improve quality of life and survival for outpatients with advanced cancer, but there are limited population-based data on the value of inpatient PC. We assessed PC as a component of high-value care among a nationally representative sample of inpatients with metastatic cancer and identified hospitalization characteristics significantly associated with high costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalizations of patients 18 years and older with a primary diagnosis of metastatic cancer from the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to assess medical services, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics associated with higher charges billed to insurance and hospital costs. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to determine cost savings associated with provision of PC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 397,691 hospitalizations from 2010 to 2019, the median charge per admission increased by 24.9%, from $44,904 in US dollars (USD) to $56,098 USD, whereas the median hospital cost remained stable at $14,300 USD. Receipt of inpatient PC was associated with significantly lower charges (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.64]; <i>P</i> < .001) and costs (OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.61]; <i>P</i> < .001). Factors associated with high charges were receipt of invasive medical ventilation (<i>P</i> < .001) or systemic therapy (<i>P</i> < .001), Hispanic patients (<i>P</i> < .001), young age (18-49 years, <i>P</i> < .001), and for-profit hospitals (<i>P</i> < .001). PC provision was associated with a $1,310 USD (-13.6%, <i>P</i> < .001) reduction in costs per hospitalization compared with no PC, independent of the receipt of invasive care and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inpatient PC is associated with reduced hospital costs for patients with metastatic cancer, irrespective of age and receipt of aggressive interventions. Integration of inpatient PC may de-escalate costs incurred through low-value inpatient interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"252-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.23.00576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.23.00576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随机对照试验表明,姑息治疗(PC)可以提高晚期癌症门诊患者的生活质量和生存率,但有关住院患者姑息治疗价值的人群数据却很有限。我们评估了具有全国代表性的转移性癌症住院患者样本中作为高价值护理组成部分的姑息治疗,并确定了与高成本显著相关的住院特征。方法:我们分析了 2010 年至 2019 年全国住院患者样本中主要诊断为转移性癌症的 18 岁及以上患者的住院情况。我们使用多变量混合效应逻辑回归来评估与较高保险费用和住院费用相关的医疗服务、患者人口统计学特征和医院特征。我们使用广义线性混合效应模型来确定与提供 PC 相关的成本节约情况:在 2010 年至 2019 年的 397,691 例住院患者中,每次入院的费用中位数增加了 24.9%,从 44,904 美元增至 56,098 美元,而住院费用中位数则稳定在 14,300 美元。住院患者接受 PC 治疗可显著降低费用(几率比 [OR],0.62 [95% CI,0.61 至 0.64];P < .001)和成本(OR,0.59 [95% CI,0.58 至 0.61];P < .001)。与高收费相关的因素包括接受有创医疗通气(P < .001)或全身治疗(P < .001)、西班牙裔患者(P < .001)、年轻(18-49 岁,P < .001)和营利性医院(P < .001)。与不提供个人护理相比,提供个人护理可使每次住院费用减少 1,310 美元(-13.6%,P < .001),这与是否接受侵入性护理和年龄无关:住院患者 PC 与转移性癌症患者住院费用的降低有关,与年龄和接受侵袭性治疗无关。整合住院患者个人护理可降低低价值住院干预所产生的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palliative Care as a Component of High-Value and Cost-Saving Care During Hospitalization for Metastatic Cancer.

Purpose: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that palliative care (PC) can improve quality of life and survival for outpatients with advanced cancer, but there are limited population-based data on the value of inpatient PC. We assessed PC as a component of high-value care among a nationally representative sample of inpatients with metastatic cancer and identified hospitalization characteristics significantly associated with high costs.

Methods: Hospitalizations of patients 18 years and older with a primary diagnosis of metastatic cancer from the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to assess medical services, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics associated with higher charges billed to insurance and hospital costs. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to determine cost savings associated with provision of PC.

Results: Among 397,691 hospitalizations from 2010 to 2019, the median charge per admission increased by 24.9%, from $44,904 in US dollars (USD) to $56,098 USD, whereas the median hospital cost remained stable at $14,300 USD. Receipt of inpatient PC was associated with significantly lower charges (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.64]; P < .001) and costs (OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.61]; P < .001). Factors associated with high charges were receipt of invasive medical ventilation (P < .001) or systemic therapy (P < .001), Hispanic patients (P < .001), young age (18-49 years, P < .001), and for-profit hospitals (P < .001). PC provision was associated with a $1,310 USD (-13.6%, P < .001) reduction in costs per hospitalization compared with no PC, independent of the receipt of invasive care and age.

Conclusion: Inpatient PC is associated with reduced hospital costs for patients with metastatic cancer, irrespective of age and receipt of aggressive interventions. Integration of inpatient PC may de-escalate costs incurred through low-value inpatient interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信