埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚阿塞拉镇小贩的卫生习惯及其对生乳中大肠菌群、沙门氏菌和志贺氏杆菌的影响。

IF 2.7 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
International Journal of Food Science Pub Date : 2024-02-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/8869022
Hirpo Tusa, Tsegaye Alemayehu, Bereket Wake Subussa, Henok Ayalew, Musa Mohammed Ali
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚阿塞拉镇小贩的卫生习惯及其对生乳中大肠菌群、沙门氏菌和志贺氏杆菌的影响。","authors":"Hirpo Tusa, Tsegaye Alemayehu, Bereket Wake Subussa, Henok Ayalew, Musa Mohammed Ali","doi":"10.1155/2024/8869022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coliform, <i>Salmonella</i>, and <i>Shigella</i> are among the most encountered bacteria in raw milk. This study is aimed at determining the extent of coliform, <i>Salmonella</i>, and <i>Shigella bacteria</i> in raw milk and vendor hygiene practices at Asella town, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, from March 1 to 30, 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 210 milk vendors were included; each vendor provided a 50 ml sample of raw milk. Bacteria were isolated and identified using standard bacteriological techniques. Data were entered and analyzed using EPI info version 7 and SPSS version 22, respectively. A binary logistic regression model was applied to determine the factors associated with bacterial contamination of raw milk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total contamination percentage of raw milk was 50 (23.8%) (95% CI: 18.1-29.5%). The predominant bacteria identified were coliform 43 (20.5%) followed by <i>Salmonella</i> species 7 (3.3%). Among coliforms, the predominant bacteria were <i>Citrobacter</i> species 15 (34.9%) followed by <i>Enterobacter</i> species 11 (25.6%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Serratia</i> species each 6 (14%), and <i>Klebsiella</i> species 5 (11.6%). However, no <i>Shigella</i> was isolated in this study. Not having the habit of washing cow teats (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), the habit of washing teats with tap water (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), not having separate cloth during milking (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), not having a practice of testing milk for bacterial contamination (<i>p</i> = 0.027), and not having separate vending environment (<i>p</i> = 0.039) were significantly associated with bacterial contamination of raw milk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percentage of bacterial contamination of milk was found to be high. Participants without a habit of washing cow teats, a habit of washing milk utensils with only tap water, and not having separate vending environments were associated factors for bacterial contamination of raw milk. Milk vendors are advised to develop the habit of washing teats before milking, avoid washing teat/milk utensils only with tap water, and have a separate vending environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14125,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Science","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8869022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hygienic Practices of Vendors and Their Contribution to Coliform, <i>Salmonella</i>, and <i>Shigella</i> Bacteria of Raw Milk at Asella Town, Oromia, Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Hirpo Tusa, Tsegaye Alemayehu, Bereket Wake Subussa, Henok Ayalew, Musa Mohammed Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/8869022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coliform, <i>Salmonella</i>, and <i>Shigella</i> are among the most encountered bacteria in raw milk. This study is aimed at determining the extent of coliform, <i>Salmonella</i>, and <i>Shigella bacteria</i> in raw milk and vendor hygiene practices at Asella town, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, from March 1 to 30, 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 210 milk vendors were included; each vendor provided a 50 ml sample of raw milk. Bacteria were isolated and identified using standard bacteriological techniques. Data were entered and analyzed using EPI info version 7 and SPSS version 22, respectively. A binary logistic regression model was applied to determine the factors associated with bacterial contamination of raw milk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total contamination percentage of raw milk was 50 (23.8%) (95% CI: 18.1-29.5%). The predominant bacteria identified were coliform 43 (20.5%) followed by <i>Salmonella</i> species 7 (3.3%). Among coliforms, the predominant bacteria were <i>Citrobacter</i> species 15 (34.9%) followed by <i>Enterobacter</i> species 11 (25.6%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Serratia</i> species each 6 (14%), and <i>Klebsiella</i> species 5 (11.6%). However, no <i>Shigella</i> was isolated in this study. Not having the habit of washing cow teats (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), the habit of washing teats with tap water (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), not having separate cloth during milking (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), not having a practice of testing milk for bacterial contamination (<i>p</i> = 0.027), and not having separate vending environment (<i>p</i> = 0.039) were significantly associated with bacterial contamination of raw milk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percentage of bacterial contamination of milk was found to be high. Participants without a habit of washing cow teats, a habit of washing milk utensils with only tap water, and not having separate vending environments were associated factors for bacterial contamination of raw milk. Milk vendors are advised to develop the habit of washing teats before milking, avoid washing teat/milk utensils only with tap water, and have a separate vending environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"8869022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8869022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8869022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大肠菌群、沙门氏菌和志贺氏杆菌是生牛奶中最常见的细菌。本研究旨在确定 2022 年 3 月 1 日至 30 日期间埃塞俄比亚奥罗莫地区州阿塞拉镇生乳中大肠菌群、沙门氏菌和志贺氏杆菌的含量以及商贩的卫生习惯:这项研究包括 210 个牛奶商贩;每个商贩提供 50 毫升的生牛奶样本。采用标准细菌学技术分离和鉴定细菌。数据分别使用 EPI info version 7 和 SPSS version 22 输入和分析。采用二元逻辑回归模型确定生乳细菌污染的相关因素:生乳的总污染率为 50 (23.8%) (95% CI: 18.1-29.5%)。发现的主要细菌是大肠菌群 43 个(20.5%),其次是沙门氏菌 7 个(3.3%)。在大肠菌群中,最主要的细菌是柠檬酸杆菌 15 个(34.9%),其次是肠杆菌 11 个(25.6%)、大肠埃希氏菌和沙雷氏菌各 6 个(14%)以及克雷伯氏菌 5 个(11.6%)。不过,本研究没有分离到志贺氏菌。没有清洗奶牛乳头的习惯(p < 0.0001)、用自来水清洗乳头的习惯(p < 0.0001)、挤奶时没有单独的抹布(p < 0.0001)、没有对牛奶进行细菌污染检测的习惯(p = 0.027)以及没有单独的售奶环境(p = 0.039)与生牛奶的细菌污染显著相关:结论:牛奶受细菌污染的比例很高。没有清洗奶牛乳头习惯的参与者、只用自来水清洗牛奶用具的习惯以及没有独立的售奶环境是导致生奶受细菌污染的相关因素。建议牛奶商养成挤奶前清洗乳头的习惯,避免只用自来水清洗乳头/牛奶用具,并拥有独立的售奶环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hygienic Practices of Vendors and Their Contribution to Coliform, Salmonella, and Shigella Bacteria of Raw Milk at Asella Town, Oromia, Ethiopia.

Background: Coliform, Salmonella, and Shigella are among the most encountered bacteria in raw milk. This study is aimed at determining the extent of coliform, Salmonella, and Shigella bacteria in raw milk and vendor hygiene practices at Asella town, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, from March 1 to 30, 2022.

Methods: In this study, 210 milk vendors were included; each vendor provided a 50 ml sample of raw milk. Bacteria were isolated and identified using standard bacteriological techniques. Data were entered and analyzed using EPI info version 7 and SPSS version 22, respectively. A binary logistic regression model was applied to determine the factors associated with bacterial contamination of raw milk.

Results: The total contamination percentage of raw milk was 50 (23.8%) (95% CI: 18.1-29.5%). The predominant bacteria identified were coliform 43 (20.5%) followed by Salmonella species 7 (3.3%). Among coliforms, the predominant bacteria were Citrobacter species 15 (34.9%) followed by Enterobacter species 11 (25.6%), Escherichia coli and Serratia species each 6 (14%), and Klebsiella species 5 (11.6%). However, no Shigella was isolated in this study. Not having the habit of washing cow teats (p < 0.0001), the habit of washing teats with tap water (p < 0.0001), not having separate cloth during milking (p < 0.0001), not having a practice of testing milk for bacterial contamination (p = 0.027), and not having separate vending environment (p = 0.039) were significantly associated with bacterial contamination of raw milk.

Conclusions: The percentage of bacterial contamination of milk was found to be high. Participants without a habit of washing cow teats, a habit of washing milk utensils with only tap water, and not having separate vending environments were associated factors for bacterial contamination of raw milk. Milk vendors are advised to develop the habit of washing teats before milking, avoid washing teat/milk utensils only with tap water, and have a separate vending environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Food Science
International Journal of Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Food Science is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research and review articles in all areas of food science. As a multidisciplinary journal, articles discussing all aspects of food science will be considered, including, but not limited to: enhancing shelf life, food deterioration, food engineering, food handling, food processing, food quality, food safety, microbiology, and nutritional research. The journal aims to provide a valuable resource for food scientists, food producers, food retailers, nutritionists, the public health sector, and relevant governmental and non-governmental agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信