在采采蝇蛹上应用生物分子技术识别幼虫寄生地的物种。

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Bulletin of Entomological Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1017/S0007485324000014
Geoffrey Gimonneau, Robert Eustache Hounyèmè, Myra Quartey, Issiaka Barry, Sophie Ravel, Alain Boulangé
{"title":"在采采蝇蛹上应用生物分子技术识别幼虫寄生地的物种。","authors":"Geoffrey Gimonneau, Robert Eustache Hounyèmè, Myra Quartey, Issiaka Barry, Sophie Ravel, Alain Boulangé","doi":"10.1017/S0007485324000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Puparia are commonly found in tsetse fly larviposition sites during studies on larval ecology. This chitinous shell is representative of past or ongoing exploitation of these sites by tsetse flies. The morphological characteristics of the puparium are not sufficiently distinctive to allow identification of the species. This study explores the applicability of biomolecular techniques on empty puparia for tsetse fly species identification. Five techniques were compared for DNA extraction from tsetse fly puparia, 1/Chelex<sup>®</sup> 100 Resin, 2/CTAB, 3/Livak's protocol, 4/DEB + proteinase K and 5/QIAamp<sup>®</sup> DNA Mini kit, using two homogenisation methods (manual and automated). Using a combination of two primer pairs, Chelex, CTAB, and DEB + K proved the most efficient on fresh puparia with 90, 85, and 70% samples identified, respectively. Shifting from fresh to one- to nine-month-old puparia, the Chelex method gave the best result allowing species identification on puparia up to seven months old. The subsequent testing of the Chelex extraction protocol identified 152 (60%) of 252 field-collected puparia samples at species level. The results show that reliable genetic identification of tsetse flies species can be performed from empty puparia, what can prove of great interest for future ecological studies on larviposition sites. The Chelex technique was the most efficient for DNA extraction, though the age-limit of the samples stood at seven months, beyond which DNA degradation probably compromises the genetic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9370,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Entomological Research","volume":" ","pages":"203-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of biomolecular techniques on tsetse fly puparia for species identification at larvipostion sites.\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey Gimonneau, Robert Eustache Hounyèmè, Myra Quartey, Issiaka Barry, Sophie Ravel, Alain Boulangé\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0007485324000014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Puparia are commonly found in tsetse fly larviposition sites during studies on larval ecology. This chitinous shell is representative of past or ongoing exploitation of these sites by tsetse flies. The morphological characteristics of the puparium are not sufficiently distinctive to allow identification of the species. This study explores the applicability of biomolecular techniques on empty puparia for tsetse fly species identification. Five techniques were compared for DNA extraction from tsetse fly puparia, 1/Chelex<sup>®</sup> 100 Resin, 2/CTAB, 3/Livak's protocol, 4/DEB + proteinase K and 5/QIAamp<sup>®</sup> DNA Mini kit, using two homogenisation methods (manual and automated). Using a combination of two primer pairs, Chelex, CTAB, and DEB + K proved the most efficient on fresh puparia with 90, 85, and 70% samples identified, respectively. Shifting from fresh to one- to nine-month-old puparia, the Chelex method gave the best result allowing species identification on puparia up to seven months old. The subsequent testing of the Chelex extraction protocol identified 152 (60%) of 252 field-collected puparia samples at species level. The results show that reliable genetic identification of tsetse flies species can be performed from empty puparia, what can prove of great interest for future ecological studies on larviposition sites. The Chelex technique was the most efficient for DNA extraction, though the age-limit of the samples stood at seven months, beyond which DNA degradation probably compromises the genetic analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Entomological Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"203-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Entomological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485324000014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Entomological Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485324000014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在研究幼虫生态学时,通常会在采采蝇幼虫栖息地发现蛹壳。这种壳质外壳代表了采采蝇过去或现在对这些地点的利用。蛹的形态特征不够明显,无法识别物种。本研究探讨了生物分子技术在空蛹上的适用性,以鉴定采采蝇的种类。使用两种均质方法(手动和自动),比较了从采采蝇蛹中提取 DNA 的五种技术:1/Chelex® 100 树脂、2/CTAB、3/Livak's 协议、4/DEB + 蛋白酶 K 和 5/QIAamp® DNA Mini 试剂盒。事实证明,使用两种引物对组合、Chelex、CTAB 和 DEB + K 对新鲜蛹最有效,分别鉴定出 90%、85% 和 70% 的样本。从新鲜蛹到一至九个月大的蛹,Chelex 方法的结果最好,可以对七个月大的蛹进行物种鉴定。随后对 Chelex 提取方案进行了测试,在 252 个实地采集的蛹样本中,有 152 个(60%)样本的物种鉴定结果为阳性。结果表明,可以通过空蛹对采采蝇物种进行可靠的基因鉴定,这对未来幼虫产卵地的生态研究具有重大意义。Chelex 技术是提取 DNA 的最有效方法,尽管样本的年龄限制在 7 个月,超过 7 个月,DNA 降解可能会影响基因分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of biomolecular techniques on tsetse fly puparia for species identification at larvipostion sites.

Puparia are commonly found in tsetse fly larviposition sites during studies on larval ecology. This chitinous shell is representative of past or ongoing exploitation of these sites by tsetse flies. The morphological characteristics of the puparium are not sufficiently distinctive to allow identification of the species. This study explores the applicability of biomolecular techniques on empty puparia for tsetse fly species identification. Five techniques were compared for DNA extraction from tsetse fly puparia, 1/Chelex® 100 Resin, 2/CTAB, 3/Livak's protocol, 4/DEB + proteinase K and 5/QIAamp® DNA Mini kit, using two homogenisation methods (manual and automated). Using a combination of two primer pairs, Chelex, CTAB, and DEB + K proved the most efficient on fresh puparia with 90, 85, and 70% samples identified, respectively. Shifting from fresh to one- to nine-month-old puparia, the Chelex method gave the best result allowing species identification on puparia up to seven months old. The subsequent testing of the Chelex extraction protocol identified 152 (60%) of 252 field-collected puparia samples at species level. The results show that reliable genetic identification of tsetse flies species can be performed from empty puparia, what can prove of great interest for future ecological studies on larviposition sites. The Chelex technique was the most efficient for DNA extraction, though the age-limit of the samples stood at seven months, beyond which DNA degradation probably compromises the genetic analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1910, the internationally recognised Bulletin of Entomological Research aims to further global knowledge of entomology through the generalisation of research findings rather than providing more entomological exceptions. The Bulletin publishes high quality and original research papers, ''critiques'' and review articles concerning insects or other arthropods of economic importance in agriculture, forestry, stored products, biological control, medicine, animal health and natural resource management. The scope of papers addresses the biology, ecology, behaviour, physiology and systematics of individuals and populations, with a particular emphasis upon the major current and emerging pests of agriculture, horticulture and forestry, and vectors of human and animal diseases. This includes the interactions between species (plants, hosts for parasites, natural enemies and whole communities), novel methodological developments, including molecular biology, in an applied context. The Bulletin does not publish the results of pesticide testing or traditional taxonomic revisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信