化身观音:惠善尼、真兰与哲学的他力

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Leah Kalmanson
{"title":"化身观音:惠善尼、真兰与哲学的他力","authors":"Leah Kalmanson","doi":"10.1163/15406253-12340120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Here the relationship between Shinran and Eshinni, founding family of the largest Buddhist sect in Japan, serves as a methodological model for philosophical engagement. Though the Pure Land notion of “easy practice” (Jp. <em>igyō</em> <styled-content lang=\"zh-Hans\" xmlns:dc=\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\" xmlns:ifp=\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\">易行</styled-content>) may be seen as Zen’s less rigorous counterpart, Shinran’s turn toward “other-power” (<em>tariki</em> <styled-content lang=\"zh-Hans\" xmlns:dc=\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\" xmlns:ifp=\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\">他力</styled-content>) is driven by the same philosophical debates over practice and liberation that occupied contemporaries such as Dōgen. The answers to such debates, which Shinran and Eshinni enacted concretely via their lifestyle choices, help us rethink both academic practices and the role of philosophers as engaged intellectuals today.</p>","PeriodicalId":45346,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CHINESE PHILOSOPHY","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incarnating Kannon: Eshinni, Shinran, and the Other-Power of Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"Leah Kalmanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15406253-12340120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Here the relationship between Shinran and Eshinni, founding family of the largest Buddhist sect in Japan, serves as a methodological model for philosophical engagement. Though the Pure Land notion of “easy practice” (Jp. <em>igyō</em> <styled-content lang=\\\"zh-Hans\\\" xmlns:dc=\\\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\\\" xmlns:ifp=\\\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\\\">易行</styled-content>) may be seen as Zen’s less rigorous counterpart, Shinran’s turn toward “other-power” (<em>tariki</em> <styled-content lang=\\\"zh-Hans\\\" xmlns:dc=\\\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\\\" xmlns:ifp=\\\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\\\">他力</styled-content>) is driven by the same philosophical debates over practice and liberation that occupied contemporaries such as Dōgen. The answers to such debates, which Shinran and Eshinni enacted concretely via their lifestyle choices, help us rethink both academic practices and the role of philosophers as engaged intellectuals today.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CHINESE PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CHINESE PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-12340120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CHINESE PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-12340120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这里,日本最大佛教宗派的创始家族真兰与义信尼之间的关系成为哲学参与的方法论典范。虽然净土宗的 "易行"(igyō igyō 易行)概念可被视为禅宗不那么严格的对应概念,但真兰对 "他力"(tariki 他力)的转向也是受道元等同时代人关于修行和解脱的哲学辩论所驱动。信兰和惠新尼通过他们的生活方式选择具体地表达了对这些争论的答案,这有助于我们重新思考学术实践和哲学家作为当今参与性知识分子的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incarnating Kannon: Eshinni, Shinran, and the Other-Power of Philosophy

Here the relationship between Shinran and Eshinni, founding family of the largest Buddhist sect in Japan, serves as a methodological model for philosophical engagement. Though the Pure Land notion of “easy practice” (Jp. igyō 易行) may be seen as Zen’s less rigorous counterpart, Shinran’s turn toward “other-power” (tariki 他力) is driven by the same philosophical debates over practice and liberation that occupied contemporaries such as Dōgen. The answers to such debates, which Shinran and Eshinni enacted concretely via their lifestyle choices, help us rethink both academic practices and the role of philosophers as engaged intellectuals today.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Since its foundation Journal of Chinese Philosophy has established itself at the forefront of contemporary scholarly understanding of Chinese philosophy, providing an outlet for the dissemination and interpretation of Chinese thought and values. The journal has three main aims: first, to make available careful English-language translations of important materials in the history of Chinese philosophy; second, to publish interpretations and expositions in Chinese philosophy; third, a commitment to publishing comparative studies within Chinese philosophy or in relation to schools of thought in the Western tradition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信