基于 1.1 毫米间距 BGO 阵列的 DOI 编码 PET 探测器与不同反射器的性能比较

IF 4.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Junwei Du;Shixian Du
{"title":"基于 1.1 毫米间距 BGO 阵列的 DOI 编码 PET 探测器与不同反射器的性能比较","authors":"Junwei Du;Shixian Du","doi":"10.1109/TRPMS.2024.3361891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bismuth germanate (BGO)-based positron emission tomography (PET) detectors are potential candidates for low-dose imaging PET scanners, owing to the high stopping power and low background radiation of BGO. In this article, we compared the performance of two dual-ended readout PET detectors based on \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$15\\times15$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n BGO arrays. Both arrays had the same 1.1 mm pitch but utilized different reflectors—barium sulfate (BaSO4) and enhanced specular reflector film (ESR)—for high-resolution PET applications. The detectors were constructed with Hamamatsu 13361–2050-08 silicon photomultiplier arrays. Each BGO element had dimensions of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$1.02\\times 1.02\\times20$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n mm3. The lateral surfaces of the BGO elements were unpolished (saw-cut), while the two ends were polished. Flood histograms showed that the detector based on the BGO array with BaSO4 reflector had much better crystal identification and depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution. Specifically, the energy, DOI, and timing resolutions for the detector using the BGO array with BaSO4 reflector were 19.8 ± 1.5%, 4.13 ± 0.48 mm, and 2.80 ± 0.23 ns, respectively. In contrast, the values obtained using the BGO array with ESR reflector were 20.9 ± 2.1%, 7.69 ± 1.92 mm, and 2.93 ± 0.20 ns, respectively.","PeriodicalId":46807,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of DOI-Encoding PET Detectors Based on 1.1-mm Pitch BGO Arrays With Different Reflectors\",\"authors\":\"Junwei Du;Shixian Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TRPMS.2024.3361891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bismuth germanate (BGO)-based positron emission tomography (PET) detectors are potential candidates for low-dose imaging PET scanners, owing to the high stopping power and low background radiation of BGO. In this article, we compared the performance of two dual-ended readout PET detectors based on \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$15\\\\times15$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n BGO arrays. Both arrays had the same 1.1 mm pitch but utilized different reflectors—barium sulfate (BaSO4) and enhanced specular reflector film (ESR)—for high-resolution PET applications. The detectors were constructed with Hamamatsu 13361–2050-08 silicon photomultiplier arrays. Each BGO element had dimensions of \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$1.02\\\\times 1.02\\\\times20$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n mm3. The lateral surfaces of the BGO elements were unpolished (saw-cut), while the two ends were polished. Flood histograms showed that the detector based on the BGO array with BaSO4 reflector had much better crystal identification and depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution. Specifically, the energy, DOI, and timing resolutions for the detector using the BGO array with BaSO4 reflector were 19.8 ± 1.5%, 4.13 ± 0.48 mm, and 2.80 ± 0.23 ns, respectively. In contrast, the values obtained using the BGO array with ESR reflector were 20.9 ± 2.1%, 7.69 ± 1.92 mm, and 2.93 ± 0.20 ns, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10422720/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10422720/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于锗酸铋(BGO)的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)探测器是低剂量成像 PET 扫描仪的潜在候选探测器,因为 BGO 具有高阻断能力和低本底辐射。在本文中,我们比较了基于 $15\times15$ BGO 阵列的两种双端读出 PET 探测器的性能。这两种阵列具有相同的 1.1 毫米间距,但使用了不同的反射器--硫酸钡 (BaSO4) 和增强镜面反射膜 (ESR)--用于高分辨率 PET 应用。探测器采用 Hamamatsu 13361-2050-08 硅光电倍增管阵列。每个 BGO 元件的尺寸为 1.02×times 1.02×times20$ mm3。BGO 元件的侧表面未经抛光(锯切),而两端经过抛光。泛洪直方图显示,基于 BGO 阵列和 BaSO4 反射器的探测器具有更好的晶体识别能力和相互作用深度(DOI)分辨率。具体来说,使用带有 BaSO4 反射器的 BGO 阵列的探测器的能量、DOI 和时间分辨率分别为 19.8 ± 1.5%、4.13 ± 0.48 mm 和 2.80 ± 0.23 ns。相比之下,使用带有 ESR 反射器的 BGO 阵列获得的数值分别为 20.9 ± 2.1%、7.69 ± 1.92 mm 和 2.93 ± 0.20 ns。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison of DOI-Encoding PET Detectors Based on 1.1-mm Pitch BGO Arrays With Different Reflectors
Bismuth germanate (BGO)-based positron emission tomography (PET) detectors are potential candidates for low-dose imaging PET scanners, owing to the high stopping power and low background radiation of BGO. In this article, we compared the performance of two dual-ended readout PET detectors based on $15\times15$ BGO arrays. Both arrays had the same 1.1 mm pitch but utilized different reflectors—barium sulfate (BaSO4) and enhanced specular reflector film (ESR)—for high-resolution PET applications. The detectors were constructed with Hamamatsu 13361–2050-08 silicon photomultiplier arrays. Each BGO element had dimensions of $1.02\times 1.02\times20$ mm3. The lateral surfaces of the BGO elements were unpolished (saw-cut), while the two ends were polished. Flood histograms showed that the detector based on the BGO array with BaSO4 reflector had much better crystal identification and depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution. Specifically, the energy, DOI, and timing resolutions for the detector using the BGO array with BaSO4 reflector were 19.8 ± 1.5%, 4.13 ± 0.48 mm, and 2.80 ± 0.23 ns, respectively. In contrast, the values obtained using the BGO array with ESR reflector were 20.9 ± 2.1%, 7.69 ± 1.92 mm, and 2.93 ± 0.20 ns, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信