ELEKTRA:通过分布式用户分组和博弈论能源采购为用户赋权

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Nicholas Kemp, Md Sadman Siraj, Eirini Eleni Tsiropoulou
{"title":"ELEKTRA:通过分布式用户分组和博弈论能源采购为用户赋权","authors":"Nicholas Kemp,&nbsp;Md Sadman Siraj,&nbsp;Eirini Eleni Tsiropoulou","doi":"10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework is introduced, a novel community energy management system that organizes the prosumers into autonomous communities and determines the prosumers’ optimal energy procurement in a distributed manner. Our motivation stems from the increasing complexity of the energy procurement for prosumers and the need for more efficient and decentralized approaches to optimize their energy consumption. The first element of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework implements an autonomous hedonic game-theoretic model at the prosumers’ home energy management controllers, considering the prosumers’ individual energy consumption and generation patterns, as well as the utility-provided rewards for proactive participation. Specifically, the prosumer grouping is modeled as a hedonic game, demonstrating the existence of a Nash-stable and individually-stable prosumer grouping. The second element of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework employs a distributed non-cooperative game-theoretic approach. This addresses how prosumers strategically consume energy to meet their needs while maximizing their payoff by procuring additional energy from the utility company. Also, utilizing the theory of <span><math><mi>n</mi></math></span>-person concave games allows for a thorough evaluation of accuracy, performance, and complexity in determining optimal energy consumption for prosumers. A comprehensive evaluation of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework is conducted using real data from the southwest region of USA. The results demonstrate the operational effectiveness of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework, showcasing its superiority in optimizing prosumer payoff compared to existing models. The performance assessment, grounded in real-world data, provides valuable insights into the efficacy of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework in contrast to current state-of-the-art.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49518,"journal":{"name":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ELEKTRA: Empowering prosumers with distributed prosumer grouping and game-theoretic energy procurement\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Kemp,&nbsp;Md Sadman Siraj,&nbsp;Eirini Eleni Tsiropoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework is introduced, a novel community energy management system that organizes the prosumers into autonomous communities and determines the prosumers’ optimal energy procurement in a distributed manner. Our motivation stems from the increasing complexity of the energy procurement for prosumers and the need for more efficient and decentralized approaches to optimize their energy consumption. The first element of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework implements an autonomous hedonic game-theoretic model at the prosumers’ home energy management controllers, considering the prosumers’ individual energy consumption and generation patterns, as well as the utility-provided rewards for proactive participation. Specifically, the prosumer grouping is modeled as a hedonic game, demonstrating the existence of a Nash-stable and individually-stable prosumer grouping. The second element of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework employs a distributed non-cooperative game-theoretic approach. This addresses how prosumers strategically consume energy to meet their needs while maximizing their payoff by procuring additional energy from the utility company. Also, utilizing the theory of <span><math><mi>n</mi></math></span>-person concave games allows for a thorough evaluation of accuracy, performance, and complexity in determining optimal energy consumption for prosumers. A comprehensive evaluation of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework is conducted using real data from the southwest region of USA. The results demonstrate the operational effectiveness of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework, showcasing its superiority in optimizing prosumer payoff compared to existing models. The performance assessment, grounded in real-world data, provides valuable insights into the efficacy of the <span>ELEKTRA</span> framework in contrast to current state-of-the-art.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X24000327\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X24000327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了 ELEKTRA 框架,它是一种新型社区能源管理系统,可将消费者组织成自治社区,并以分布式方式确定消费者的最佳能源采购。我们的动机源于职业消费者的能源采购日益复杂,需要更高效、更分散的方法来优化他们的能源消耗。ELEKTRA 框架的第一个要素是在消费者的家庭能源管理控制器上实施一个自主享乐博弈理论模型,考虑消费者的个人能源消耗和发电模式,以及公用事业公司为主动参与提供的奖励。具体来说,消费者分组被模拟为一种享乐博弈,证明了纳什稳定和个体稳定的消费者分组的存在。ELEKTRA 框架的第二个要素采用了分布式非合作博弈理论方法。该方法解决了消费者如何战略性地消耗能源以满足自身需求,同时通过从公用事业公司采购额外能源来实现收益最大化的问题。此外,利用 n 人凹陷博弈理论,还能对确定消费者最佳能源消耗的准确性、性能和复杂性进行全面评估。我们使用美国西南部地区的真实数据对 ELEKTRA 框架进行了全面评估。评估结果表明了 ELEKTRA 框架的运行效果,与现有模型相比,该框架在优化消费者收益方面更具优势。基于真实数据的性能评估为 ELEKTRA 框架与当前最先进技术的对比提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ELEKTRA: Empowering prosumers with distributed prosumer grouping and game-theoretic energy procurement

In this paper, the ELEKTRA framework is introduced, a novel community energy management system that organizes the prosumers into autonomous communities and determines the prosumers’ optimal energy procurement in a distributed manner. Our motivation stems from the increasing complexity of the energy procurement for prosumers and the need for more efficient and decentralized approaches to optimize their energy consumption. The first element of the ELEKTRA framework implements an autonomous hedonic game-theoretic model at the prosumers’ home energy management controllers, considering the prosumers’ individual energy consumption and generation patterns, as well as the utility-provided rewards for proactive participation. Specifically, the prosumer grouping is modeled as a hedonic game, demonstrating the existence of a Nash-stable and individually-stable prosumer grouping. The second element of the ELEKTRA framework employs a distributed non-cooperative game-theoretic approach. This addresses how prosumers strategically consume energy to meet their needs while maximizing their payoff by procuring additional energy from the utility company. Also, utilizing the theory of n-person concave games allows for a thorough evaluation of accuracy, performance, and complexity in determining optimal energy consumption for prosumers. A comprehensive evaluation of the ELEKTRA framework is conducted using real data from the southwest region of USA. The results demonstrate the operational effectiveness of the ELEKTRA framework, showcasing its superiority in optimizing prosumer payoff compared to existing models. The performance assessment, grounded in real-world data, provides valuable insights into the efficacy of the ELEKTRA framework in contrast to current state-of-the-art.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The journal Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory provides a forum for original, high-quality papers dealing with any aspect of systems simulation and modelling. The journal aims at being a reference and a powerful tool to all those professionally active and/or interested in the methods and applications of simulation. Submitted papers will be peer reviewed and must significantly contribute to modelling and simulation in general or use modelling and simulation in application areas. Paper submission is solicited on: • theoretical aspects of modelling and simulation including formal modelling, model-checking, random number generators, sensitivity analysis, variance reduction techniques, experimental design, meta-modelling, methods and algorithms for validation and verification, selection and comparison procedures etc.; • methodology and application of modelling and simulation in any area, including computer systems, networks, real-time and embedded systems, mobile and intelligent agents, manufacturing and transportation systems, management, engineering, biomedical engineering, economics, ecology and environment, education, transaction handling, etc.; • simulation languages and environments including those, specific to distributed computing, grid computing, high performance computers or computer networks, etc.; • distributed and real-time simulation, simulation interoperability; • tools for high performance computing simulation, including dedicated architectures and parallel computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信