深度学习自动检测 DECT 上的 MSU 沉积物:评估对效率和读者信心的影响。

Frontiers in radiology Pub Date : 2024-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fradi.2024.1330399
Shahriar Faghani, Soham Patel, Nicholas G Rhodes, Garret M Powell, Francis I Baffour, Mana Moassefi, Katrina N Glazebrook, Bradley J Erickson, Christin A Tiegs-Heiden
{"title":"深度学习自动检测 DECT 上的 MSU 沉积物:评估对效率和读者信心的影响。","authors":"Shahriar Faghani, Soham Patel, Nicholas G Rhodes, Garret M Powell, Francis I Baffour, Mana Moassefi, Katrina N Glazebrook, Bradley J Erickson, Christin A Tiegs-Heiden","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2024.1330399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a non-invasive way to determine the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the workup of gout. Color-coding distinguishes MSU from calcium following material decomposition and post-processing. Manually identifying these foci (most commonly labeled green) is tedious, and an automated detection system could streamline the process. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a deep-learning (DL) algorithm developed for detecting green pixelations on DECT on reader time, accuracy, and confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected a sample of positive and negative DECTs, reviewed twice-once with and once without the DL tool-with a 2-week washout period. An attending musculoskeletal radiologist and a fellow separately reviewed the cases, simulating clinical workflow. Metrics such as time taken, confidence in diagnosis, and the tool's helpfulness were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included thirty DECTs from different patients. The DL tool significantly reduced the reading time for the trainee radiologist (<i>p</i> = 0.02), but not for the attending radiologist (<i>p</i> = 0.15). Diagnostic confidence remained unchanged for both (<i>p</i> = 0.45). However, the DL model identified tiny MSU deposits that led to a change in diagnosis in two cases for the in-training radiologist and one case for the attending radiologist. In 3/3 of these cases, the diagnosis was correct when using DL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of the developed DL model slightly reduced reading time for our less experienced reader and led to improved diagnostic accuracy. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic confidence when studies were interpreted without and with the DL model.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep-learning for automated detection of MSU deposits on DECT: evaluating impact on efficiency and reader confidence.\",\"authors\":\"Shahriar Faghani, Soham Patel, Nicholas G Rhodes, Garret M Powell, Francis I Baffour, Mana Moassefi, Katrina N Glazebrook, Bradley J Erickson, Christin A Tiegs-Heiden\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fradi.2024.1330399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a non-invasive way to determine the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the workup of gout. Color-coding distinguishes MSU from calcium following material decomposition and post-processing. Manually identifying these foci (most commonly labeled green) is tedious, and an automated detection system could streamline the process. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a deep-learning (DL) algorithm developed for detecting green pixelations on DECT on reader time, accuracy, and confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected a sample of positive and negative DECTs, reviewed twice-once with and once without the DL tool-with a 2-week washout period. An attending musculoskeletal radiologist and a fellow separately reviewed the cases, simulating clinical workflow. Metrics such as time taken, confidence in diagnosis, and the tool's helpfulness were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included thirty DECTs from different patients. The DL tool significantly reduced the reading time for the trainee radiologist (<i>p</i> = 0.02), but not for the attending radiologist (<i>p</i> = 0.15). Diagnostic confidence remained unchanged for both (<i>p</i> = 0.45). However, the DL model identified tiny MSU deposits that led to a change in diagnosis in two cases for the in-training radiologist and one case for the attending radiologist. In 3/3 of these cases, the diagnosis was correct when using DL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of the developed DL model slightly reduced reading time for our less experienced reader and led to improved diagnostic accuracy. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic confidence when studies were interpreted without and with the DL model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909828/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2024.1330399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2024.1330399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:双能 CT(DECT)是在痛风检查中确定是否存在单钠尿酸盐(MSU)结晶的一种无创方法。在材料分解和后处理之后,彩色编码可将 MSU 与钙区分开来。手动识别这些病灶(最常见的标记为绿色)非常繁琐,自动检测系统可简化这一过程。本研究旨在评估为检测 DECT 绿色像素点而开发的深度学习(DL)算法对阅读时间、准确性和可信度的影响:我们收集了阳性和阴性 DECT 样本,分别使用 DL 工具和不使用 DL 工具进行两次复查,中间有两周的空白期。一名肌肉骨骼放射主治医生和一名研究员分别对病例进行复查,模拟临床工作流程。我们记录并统计分析了所花费的时间、对诊断的信心以及该工具的帮助程度等指标:结果:我们纳入了来自不同患者的 30 份 DECT。DL 工具大大减少了放射科实习医生的阅读时间(p = 0.02),但没有减少放射科主治医生的阅读时间(p = 0.15)。两者的诊断可信度保持不变(p = 0.45)。然而,DL 模型发现了微小的 MSU 沉积物,导致在训放射医师和主治放射医师分别在两个病例和一个病例中改变了诊断。在这些病例中,3/3 的诊断在使用 DL 时是正确的:结论:采用所开发的 DL 模型略微缩短了经验不足的放射科医生的读片时间,并提高了诊断准确性。在没有使用 DL 模型和使用 DL 模型解读研究结果的情况下,诊断可信度没有明显的统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep-learning for automated detection of MSU deposits on DECT: evaluating impact on efficiency and reader confidence.

Introduction: Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a non-invasive way to determine the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the workup of gout. Color-coding distinguishes MSU from calcium following material decomposition and post-processing. Manually identifying these foci (most commonly labeled green) is tedious, and an automated detection system could streamline the process. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a deep-learning (DL) algorithm developed for detecting green pixelations on DECT on reader time, accuracy, and confidence.

Methods: We collected a sample of positive and negative DECTs, reviewed twice-once with and once without the DL tool-with a 2-week washout period. An attending musculoskeletal radiologist and a fellow separately reviewed the cases, simulating clinical workflow. Metrics such as time taken, confidence in diagnosis, and the tool's helpfulness were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results: We included thirty DECTs from different patients. The DL tool significantly reduced the reading time for the trainee radiologist (p = 0.02), but not for the attending radiologist (p = 0.15). Diagnostic confidence remained unchanged for both (p = 0.45). However, the DL model identified tiny MSU deposits that led to a change in diagnosis in two cases for the in-training radiologist and one case for the attending radiologist. In 3/3 of these cases, the diagnosis was correct when using DL.

Conclusions: The implementation of the developed DL model slightly reduced reading time for our less experienced reader and led to improved diagnostic accuracy. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic confidence when studies were interpreted without and with the DL model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信