基于血管内超声的分数血流储备在评估中级左主干狭窄中的诊断性能。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yong-Gang Sui, Cheng Yang, Chang-Dong Guan, Yan-Lu Xu, Na-Qiong Wu, Wei-Xian Yang, Yong-Jian Wu, Ke-Fei Dou, Yue-Jin Yang, Shu-Bin Qiao, Wei Yu, Bo Xu, Sheng-Xian Tu, Jie Qian
{"title":"基于血管内超声的分数血流储备在评估中级左主干狭窄中的诊断性能。","authors":"Yong-Gang Sui, Cheng Yang, Chang-Dong Guan, Yan-Lu Xu, Na-Qiong Wu, Wei-Xian Yang, Yong-Jian Wu, Ke-Fei Dou, Yue-Jin Yang, Shu-Bin Qiao, Wei Yu, Bo Xu, Sheng-Xian Tu, Jie Qian","doi":"10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main (LM) stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) in a blinded fashion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients (mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified (<i>r</i> = 0.688, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03 (standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50% (AUC = 0.66, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA (AUC = 0.82; <i>P</i> = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9% (95% CI: 70.2-95.7), 93.1% (95% CI: 82.2-100.0), 58.3% (95% CI: 26.3-90.4), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10908580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Gang Sui, Cheng Yang, Chang-Dong Guan, Yan-Lu Xu, Na-Qiong Wu, Wei-Xian Yang, Yong-Jian Wu, Ke-Fei Dou, Yue-Jin Yang, Shu-Bin Qiao, Wei Yu, Bo Xu, Sheng-Xian Tu, Jie Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main (LM) stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) in a blinded fashion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients (mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified (<i>r</i> = 0.688, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03 (standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50% (AUC = 0.66, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA (AUC = 0.82; <i>P</i> = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9% (95% CI: 70.2-95.7), 93.1% (95% CI: 82.2-100.0), 58.3% (95% CI: 26.3-90.4), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10908580/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近推出的超声血流比(UFR)是从血管内超声(IVUS)图像中得出分数血流储备(FFR)的一种新型快速计算方法。在本研究中,我们评估了 UFR 在左主干(LM)中级狭窄患者中的诊断性能:这是一项前瞻性的单中心研究,连续对存在左主干中段病变(目测直径狭窄率为30%-80%)的患者进行了IVUS和FFR测量。独立的核心实验室以盲法评估离线 UFR 和 IVUS 导出的最小管腔面积 (MLA):结果:41 名 LM 患者(平均年龄为 62.0 ± 9.9 岁,46.3% 为糖尿病患者)均成功获得了 UFR 和 FFR。UFR 和 FFR 之间的相关性可以接受(r = 0.688,P < 0.0001),绝对数值差为 0.03(标准差:0.01)。UFR 诊断有生理意义的冠状动脉狭窄的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01),明显高于血管造影确定的狭窄 > 50%(AUC = 0.66,P < 0.001),在数值上也高于 IVUS 导出的 MLA(AUC = 0.82; P = 0.09)。UFR识别FFR≤0.80的患者水平诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为82.9%(95% CI:70.2-95.7)、93.1%(95% CI:82.2-100.0)、58.3%(95% CI:26.3-90.4):在中度 LM 疾病患者中,事实证明 UFR 与作为标准参考的基于压力导线的 FFR 具有可接受的相关性和高准确性。本研究支持使用 UFR 对中度 LM 狭窄进行功能评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis.

Background: The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main (LM) stenosis.

Methods: This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) in a blinded fashion.

Results: Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients (mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified (r = 0.688, P < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03 (standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50% (AUC = 0.66, P < 0.001) and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA (AUC = 0.82; P = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9% (95% CI: 70.2-95.7), 93.1% (95% CI: 82.2-100.0), 58.3% (95% CI: 26.3-90.4), respectively.

Conclusion: In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1161
期刊介绍: JGC focuses on both basic research and clinical practice to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease in the aged people, especially those with concomitant disease of other major organ-systems, such as the lungs, the kidneys, liver, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract or endocrinology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信