基于工作量数据的棒球投手间隔投掷训练计划

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.94146
Michael M Reinold, Brittany Dowling, Glenn S Fleisig, Leonard C Macrina, Kevin E Wilk, John T Streepy, James R Andrews
{"title":"基于工作量数据的棒球投手间隔投掷训练计划","authors":"Michael M Reinold, Brittany Dowling, Glenn S Fleisig, Leonard C Macrina, Kevin E Wilk, John T Streepy, James R Andrews","doi":"10.26603/001c.94146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interval throwing programs (ITP) have been used for decades to enable baseball pitchers to return to competition after injury or surgery by gradually applying load to the throwing arm. Past programs have been based on personal experience; however, advances in our understanding of the biomechanics and workloads of throwing allow for a more modern data-based program to be developed.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/purpose: </strong>To 1) develop a updated ITP for rehabilitation of modern baseball pitchers based upon biomechanical and throwing workload data, and 2) compare the updated program with a past program to determine differences in chronic workload and acute:chronic workload ratios (ACWR).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workloads (i.e. daily, acute, chronic, and ACWR) for the original ITP were built from the prescribed throwing schedule. Elbow varus torque per throw was calculated based upon a relationship between elbow varus torque and throwing distance. Throw counts, daily/chronic/acute workloads, and ACWR were calculated and plotted over time. A new ITP was built to model current pitcher's throwing schedules and gradually increased ACWR over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original ITP had a throwing schedule of 136 days, final chronic workload 15.0, and the ACWR above or below the \"safe\" range (i.e. 0.7 - 1.3) for 18% of the program with a peak of 1.61. The updated ITP was built to consist of a 217-day schedule, final chronic workload of 10.8, and deviated from the safe range for 9% of the program, with a peak of 1.33.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly created ITP is more familiar to modern baseball pitchers while exhibiting a more gradual buildup of chronic workload than traditional ITP programs. This ITP may be used to return baseball pitchers back to competition as safely and efficiently as possible, and potentially with less risk of setbacks or reinjury. The ITP may be used following common injuries or surgeries to the throwing shoulder and elbow, such as Tommy John surgery, while also serving as a basis for future development of shorter duration ITPs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2c.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Interval Throwing Program for Baseball Pitchers Based upon Workload Data.\",\"authors\":\"Michael M Reinold, Brittany Dowling, Glenn S Fleisig, Leonard C Macrina, Kevin E Wilk, John T Streepy, James R Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.94146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interval throwing programs (ITP) have been used for decades to enable baseball pitchers to return to competition after injury or surgery by gradually applying load to the throwing arm. Past programs have been based on personal experience; however, advances in our understanding of the biomechanics and workloads of throwing allow for a more modern data-based program to be developed.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/purpose: </strong>To 1) develop a updated ITP for rehabilitation of modern baseball pitchers based upon biomechanical and throwing workload data, and 2) compare the updated program with a past program to determine differences in chronic workload and acute:chronic workload ratios (ACWR).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workloads (i.e. daily, acute, chronic, and ACWR) for the original ITP were built from the prescribed throwing schedule. Elbow varus torque per throw was calculated based upon a relationship between elbow varus torque and throwing distance. Throw counts, daily/chronic/acute workloads, and ACWR were calculated and plotted over time. A new ITP was built to model current pitcher's throwing schedules and gradually increased ACWR over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original ITP had a throwing schedule of 136 days, final chronic workload 15.0, and the ACWR above or below the \\\"safe\\\" range (i.e. 0.7 - 1.3) for 18% of the program with a peak of 1.61. The updated ITP was built to consist of a 217-day schedule, final chronic workload of 10.8, and deviated from the safe range for 9% of the program, with a peak of 1.33.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly created ITP is more familiar to modern baseball pitchers while exhibiting a more gradual buildup of chronic workload than traditional ITP programs. This ITP may be used to return baseball pitchers back to competition as safely and efficiently as possible, and potentially with less risk of setbacks or reinjury. The ITP may be used following common injuries or surgeries to the throwing shoulder and elbow, such as Tommy John surgery, while also serving as a basis for future development of shorter duration ITPs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2c.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909315/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.94146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.94146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:投掷间歇训练计划(ITP)已经使用了几十年,通过逐渐给投掷臂施加负荷,使棒球投手在受伤或手术后重返赛场。假设/目的:1)根据生物力学和投掷工作量数据,为现代棒球投手的康复制定最新的投掷计划;2)将最新计划与过去的计划进行比较,以确定慢性工作量和急性:慢性工作量比(ACWR)的差异:研究设计:横断面研究:研究设计:横断面研究。方法:根据规定的投掷时间表建立原始 ITP 的工作量(即每日、急性、慢性和 ACWR)。根据肘关节屈曲力矩与投掷距离之间的关系计算每次投掷的肘关节屈曲力矩。计算并绘制出投掷次数、每日/慢性/急性工作量和 ACWR 随时间变化的曲线。建立了一个新的ITP,以模拟当前投手的投掷计划,并随着时间的推移逐渐增加ACWR:结果:原始 ITP 的投掷计划为 136 天,最终慢性工作量为 15.0,在 18% 的计划中 ACWR 高于或低于 "安全 "范围(即 0.7 - 1.3),峰值为 1.61。更新后的 ITP 包括 217 天的计划,最终慢性工作量为 10.8,9% 的计划偏离安全范围,峰值为 1.33:新创建的 ITP 更为现代棒球投手所熟悉,同时与传统的 ITP 计划相比,慢性工作量的积累更加循序渐进。这种 ITP 可用于让棒球投手尽可能安全、高效地重返赛场,并有可能降低挫折或再次受伤的风险。ITP可用于投掷肩部和肘部的常见损伤或手术(如汤米-约翰手术)后,同时也可作为未来开发持续时间更短的ITP的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Interval Throwing Program for Baseball Pitchers Based upon Workload Data.

Background: Interval throwing programs (ITP) have been used for decades to enable baseball pitchers to return to competition after injury or surgery by gradually applying load to the throwing arm. Past programs have been based on personal experience; however, advances in our understanding of the biomechanics and workloads of throwing allow for a more modern data-based program to be developed.

Hypothesis/purpose: To 1) develop a updated ITP for rehabilitation of modern baseball pitchers based upon biomechanical and throwing workload data, and 2) compare the updated program with a past program to determine differences in chronic workload and acute:chronic workload ratios (ACWR).

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: Workloads (i.e. daily, acute, chronic, and ACWR) for the original ITP were built from the prescribed throwing schedule. Elbow varus torque per throw was calculated based upon a relationship between elbow varus torque and throwing distance. Throw counts, daily/chronic/acute workloads, and ACWR were calculated and plotted over time. A new ITP was built to model current pitcher's throwing schedules and gradually increased ACWR over time.

Results: The original ITP had a throwing schedule of 136 days, final chronic workload 15.0, and the ACWR above or below the "safe" range (i.e. 0.7 - 1.3) for 18% of the program with a peak of 1.61. The updated ITP was built to consist of a 217-day schedule, final chronic workload of 10.8, and deviated from the safe range for 9% of the program, with a peak of 1.33.

Conclusion: The newly created ITP is more familiar to modern baseball pitchers while exhibiting a more gradual buildup of chronic workload than traditional ITP programs. This ITP may be used to return baseball pitchers back to competition as safely and efficiently as possible, and potentially with less risk of setbacks or reinjury. The ITP may be used following common injuries or surgeries to the throwing shoulder and elbow, such as Tommy John surgery, while also serving as a basis for future development of shorter duration ITPs.

Level of evidence: 2c.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信