{"title":"预防糖尿病前期成人肌肉疏松症的活性维生素 D 治疗(DPVD 辅助研究):随机对照试验。","authors":"Tetsuya Kawahara MD , Prof Gen Suzuki MD , Shoichi Mizuno PhD , Naoki Tominaga MD , Mikio Toda MD , Nagahiro Toyama MD , Prof Tetsuya Inazu MD , Chie Kawahara MD , Yosuke Okada MD , Prof Yoshiya Tanaka MD","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00009-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Observational studies show inverse associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and sarcopenia incidence; however, it remains unclear whether treatment with vitamin D prevents its development. We aimed to assess whether treatment with active vitamin D (eldecalcitol [0·75 μg per day]) can reduce the development of sarcopenia among adults with prediabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial as an ancillary study was conducted at 32 clinics and hospital sites in Japan. Participants were assigned (1:1) by using a central randomisation method in which a randomisation list was made for each hospital separately using a stratified permuted block procedure. The primary endpoint was sarcopenia incidence during 3 years in the intention-to-treat population defined as weak handgrip strength (<28 kg for men and <18 kg for women) and low appendicular skeletal muscle index (<7·0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for men and <5·7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for women in bioelectrical impedance analysis). Although the usual criterion of hypercalcaemia was 10·4 mg/dL (2·6 mmol/L) or higher, hypercalcaemia that was enough to discontinue the study was defined as 11·0 mg/dL or higher. This study is registered with the UMIN clinical trials registry, UMIN000005394.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 1094 participants (548 in the eldecalcitol group and 546 in the placebo group; 44·2% [484 of 1094] women; mean age 60·8 [SD 9·2] years) were followed up for a median of 2·9 (IQR 2·8–3·0) years. Eldecalcitol treatment as compared with placebo showed statistically significant preventive effect on sarcopenia incidence (25 [4·6%] of 548 participants in the eldecalcitol group and 48 [8·8%] of 546 participants in the placebo group; hazard ratio 0·51; 95% CI 0·31 to 0·83; p=0·0065). The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>We found that treatment with eldecalcitol has the potential to prevent the onset of sarcopenia among people with prediabetes via increasing skeletal muscle volume and strength, which might lead to a substantial risk reduction of falls.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Kitakyushu Medical Association.</p></div><div><h3>Translation</h3><p>For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages e255-e263"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000096/pdfft?md5=1097e8a64c8b845163d6a6e0bad59385&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active vitamin D treatment in the prevention of sarcopenia in adults with prediabetes (DPVD ancillary study): a randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuya Kawahara MD , Prof Gen Suzuki MD , Shoichi Mizuno PhD , Naoki Tominaga MD , Mikio Toda MD , Nagahiro Toyama MD , Prof Tetsuya Inazu MD , Chie Kawahara MD , Yosuke Okada MD , Prof Yoshiya Tanaka MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00009-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Observational studies show inverse associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and sarcopenia incidence; however, it remains unclear whether treatment with vitamin D prevents its development. We aimed to assess whether treatment with active vitamin D (eldecalcitol [0·75 μg per day]) can reduce the development of sarcopenia among adults with prediabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial as an ancillary study was conducted at 32 clinics and hospital sites in Japan. Participants were assigned (1:1) by using a central randomisation method in which a randomisation list was made for each hospital separately using a stratified permuted block procedure. The primary endpoint was sarcopenia incidence during 3 years in the intention-to-treat population defined as weak handgrip strength (<28 kg for men and <18 kg for women) and low appendicular skeletal muscle index (<7·0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for men and <5·7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for women in bioelectrical impedance analysis). Although the usual criterion of hypercalcaemia was 10·4 mg/dL (2·6 mmol/L) or higher, hypercalcaemia that was enough to discontinue the study was defined as 11·0 mg/dL or higher. This study is registered with the UMIN clinical trials registry, UMIN000005394.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 1094 participants (548 in the eldecalcitol group and 546 in the placebo group; 44·2% [484 of 1094] women; mean age 60·8 [SD 9·2] years) were followed up for a median of 2·9 (IQR 2·8–3·0) years. Eldecalcitol treatment as compared with placebo showed statistically significant preventive effect on sarcopenia incidence (25 [4·6%] of 548 participants in the eldecalcitol group and 48 [8·8%] of 546 participants in the placebo group; hazard ratio 0·51; 95% CI 0·31 to 0·83; p=0·0065). The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>We found that treatment with eldecalcitol has the potential to prevent the onset of sarcopenia among people with prediabetes via increasing skeletal muscle volume and strength, which might lead to a substantial risk reduction of falls.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Kitakyushu Medical Association.</p></div><div><h3>Translation</h3><p>For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages e255-e263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000096/pdfft?md5=1097e8a64c8b845163d6a6e0bad59385&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000096-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Active vitamin D treatment in the prevention of sarcopenia in adults with prediabetes (DPVD ancillary study): a randomised controlled trial
Background
Observational studies show inverse associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and sarcopenia incidence; however, it remains unclear whether treatment with vitamin D prevents its development. We aimed to assess whether treatment with active vitamin D (eldecalcitol [0·75 μg per day]) can reduce the development of sarcopenia among adults with prediabetes.
Methods
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial as an ancillary study was conducted at 32 clinics and hospital sites in Japan. Participants were assigned (1:1) by using a central randomisation method in which a randomisation list was made for each hospital separately using a stratified permuted block procedure. The primary endpoint was sarcopenia incidence during 3 years in the intention-to-treat population defined as weak handgrip strength (<28 kg for men and <18 kg for women) and low appendicular skeletal muscle index (<7·0 kg/m2 for men and <5·7 kg/m2 for women in bioelectrical impedance analysis). Although the usual criterion of hypercalcaemia was 10·4 mg/dL (2·6 mmol/L) or higher, hypercalcaemia that was enough to discontinue the study was defined as 11·0 mg/dL or higher. This study is registered with the UMIN clinical trials registry, UMIN000005394.
Findings
A total of 1094 participants (548 in the eldecalcitol group and 546 in the placebo group; 44·2% [484 of 1094] women; mean age 60·8 [SD 9·2] years) were followed up for a median of 2·9 (IQR 2·8–3·0) years. Eldecalcitol treatment as compared with placebo showed statistically significant preventive effect on sarcopenia incidence (25 [4·6%] of 548 participants in the eldecalcitol group and 48 [8·8%] of 546 participants in the placebo group; hazard ratio 0·51; 95% CI 0·31 to 0·83; p=0·0065). The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups.
Interpretation
We found that treatment with eldecalcitol has the potential to prevent the onset of sarcopenia among people with prediabetes via increasing skeletal muscle volume and strength, which might lead to a substantial risk reduction of falls.
Funding
Kitakyushu Medical Association.
Translation
For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.