通过网络调查评估日本非系统性幼年特发性关节炎患者的停药情况。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Takasuke Ebato, Takayuki Kishi, Keiji Akamine, Tomo Nozawa, Tomoyuki Imagawa, Yuki Bando, Takako Miyamae
{"title":"通过网络调查评估日本非系统性幼年特发性关节炎患者的停药情况。","authors":"Takasuke Ebato, Takayuki Kishi, Keiji Akamine, Tomo Nozawa, Tomoyuki Imagawa, Yuki Bando, Takako Miyamae","doi":"10.1093/mr/roae016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have seen considerable advancements, there remains a lack of clear guidelines on withdrawing medications. This study aimed to investigate the current strategies for discontinuing non-systemic JIA treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to 126 responses, the most significant factors influencing JIA treatment tapering were the duration of clinically inactive disease, medication toxicity, and a history of arthritis flares. Respondents were often cautious about discontinuing medication if symptoms, e.g. 'morning stiffness' or 'intermittent joint pain', persisted. Among subtypes, oligoarticular JIA was more amenable to treatment tapering, whereas rheumatoid factor-positive polyarticular JIA proved less amenable. Most respondents started medication tapering after a continuous clinical inactive duration exceeding 12 months, and >50% of them required >6 months to achieve treatment discontinuation. Additionally, 40% of the respondents consistently underwent imaging before treatment tapering.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relative risks of treatment continuation and withdrawal should be considered, and decisions should be made accordingly. To obtain improved understanding of and more robust evidence for the optimal strategies for safely discontinuing JIA treatment, it is crucial to continue investigations including long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of medication withdrawal in patients with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japan using a web-based survey.\",\"authors\":\"Takasuke Ebato, Takayuki Kishi, Keiji Akamine, Tomo Nozawa, Tomoyuki Imagawa, Yuki Bando, Takako Miyamae\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mr/roae016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have seen considerable advancements, there remains a lack of clear guidelines on withdrawing medications. This study aimed to investigate the current strategies for discontinuing non-systemic JIA treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to 126 responses, the most significant factors influencing JIA treatment tapering were the duration of clinically inactive disease, medication toxicity, and a history of arthritis flares. Respondents were often cautious about discontinuing medication if symptoms, e.g. 'morning stiffness' or 'intermittent joint pain', persisted. Among subtypes, oligoarticular JIA was more amenable to treatment tapering, whereas rheumatoid factor-positive polyarticular JIA proved less amenable. Most respondents started medication tapering after a continuous clinical inactive duration exceeding 12 months, and >50% of them required >6 months to achieve treatment discontinuation. Additionally, 40% of the respondents consistently underwent imaging before treatment tapering.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relative risks of treatment continuation and withdrawal should be considered, and decisions should be made accordingly. To obtain improved understanding of and more robust evidence for the optimal strategies for safely discontinuing JIA treatment, it is crucial to continue investigations including long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)的治疗取得了长足的进步,但仍然缺乏明确的停药指南。本研究旨在调查目前停止非系统性 JIA 治疗的策略:方法:向日本小儿风湿病协会会员发放网络问卷:结果:根据126份答复,影响JIA治疗减量的最主要因素是临床非活动性疾病的持续时间、药物毒性和关节炎发作史。如果 "晨僵 "或 "间歇性关节痛 "等症状持续存在,受访者通常会对停药持谨慎态度。在各亚型中,少关节型JIA更适合减药治疗,而类风湿因子阳性的多关节型JIA则不太适合。大多数受访者在持续临床不活动时间超过 12 个月后开始减药,其中超过 50% 的受访者需要超过 6 个月才能实现停药。此外,40%的受访者在减少治疗前一直接受影像学检查:结论:应考虑继续治疗和停止治疗的相对风险,并做出相应的决定。为了更好地了解安全停止JIA治疗的最佳策略并获得更有力的证据,继续开展包括长期结果在内的调查至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of medication withdrawal in patients with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japan using a web-based survey.

Objectives: Although treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have seen considerable advancements, there remains a lack of clear guidelines on withdrawing medications. This study aimed to investigate the current strategies for discontinuing non-systemic JIA treatment.

Methods: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan.

Results: According to 126 responses, the most significant factors influencing JIA treatment tapering were the duration of clinically inactive disease, medication toxicity, and a history of arthritis flares. Respondents were often cautious about discontinuing medication if symptoms, e.g. 'morning stiffness' or 'intermittent joint pain', persisted. Among subtypes, oligoarticular JIA was more amenable to treatment tapering, whereas rheumatoid factor-positive polyarticular JIA proved less amenable. Most respondents started medication tapering after a continuous clinical inactive duration exceeding 12 months, and >50% of them required >6 months to achieve treatment discontinuation. Additionally, 40% of the respondents consistently underwent imaging before treatment tapering.

Conclusions: The relative risks of treatment continuation and withdrawal should be considered, and decisions should be made accordingly. To obtain improved understanding of and more robust evidence for the optimal strategies for safely discontinuing JIA treatment, it is crucial to continue investigations including long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Rheumatology
Modern Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery. Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered. Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信