尿酸结石检测的进展:深度学习与上尿路 CT 成像和临床评估的整合。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Internationalis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1159/000538133
Lichen Jin, Zongxin Chen, Yizhang Sun, Zhen Tian, Xincheng Yi, Yuhua Huang
{"title":"尿酸结石检测的进展:深度学习与上尿路 CT 成像和临床评估的整合。","authors":"Lichen Jin, Zongxin Chen, Yizhang Sun, Zhen Tian, Xincheng Yi, Yuhua Huang","doi":"10.1159/000538133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Among upper urinary tract stones, a significant proportion comprises uric acid stones. The aim of this study was to use machine learning techniques to analyze CT scans and blood and urine test data, with the aim of establishing multiple predictive models that can accurately identify uric acid stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We divided 276 patients with upper urinary tract stones into two groups: 48 with uric acid stones and 228 with other types, identified using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. To distinguish the stone types, we created three types of deep learning models and extensively compared their classification performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the three major types of models, considering accuracy, sensitivity, and recall, CLNC-LR, IMG-support vector machine (SVM), and FUS-SVM perform the best. The accuracy and F1 score for the three models were as follows: CLNC-LR (82.14%, 0.7813), IMG-SVM (89.29%, 0.89), and FUS-SVM (29.29%, 0.8818). The area under the curves for classes CLNC-LR, IMG-SVM, and FUS-SVM were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.99, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows the feasibility of utilizing deep learning to assess whether urinary tract stones are uric acid stones through CT scans, blood, and urine tests. It can serve as a supplementary tool for traditional stone composition analysis, offering decision support for urologists and enhancing the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"234-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancements in Uric Acid Stone Detection: Integrating Deep Learning with CT Imaging and Clinical Assessments in the Upper Urinary Tract.\",\"authors\":\"Lichen Jin, Zongxin Chen, Yizhang Sun, Zhen Tian, Xincheng Yi, Yuhua Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Among upper urinary tract stones, a significant proportion comprises uric acid stones. The aim of this study was to use machine learning techniques to analyze CT scans and blood and urine test data, with the aim of establishing multiple predictive models that can accurately identify uric acid stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We divided 276 patients with upper urinary tract stones into two groups: 48 with uric acid stones and 228 with other types, identified using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. To distinguish the stone types, we created three types of deep learning models and extensively compared their classification performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the three major types of models, considering accuracy, sensitivity, and recall, CLNC-LR, IMG-support vector machine (SVM), and FUS-SVM perform the best. The accuracy and F1 score for the three models were as follows: CLNC-LR (82.14%, 0.7813), IMG-SVM (89.29%, 0.89), and FUS-SVM (29.29%, 0.8818). The area under the curves for classes CLNC-LR, IMG-SVM, and FUS-SVM were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.99, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows the feasibility of utilizing deep learning to assess whether urinary tract stones are uric acid stones through CT scans, blood, and urine tests. It can serve as a supplementary tool for traditional stone composition analysis, offering decision support for urologists and enhancing the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"234-241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界尿路结石的发病率都在上升,而且复发率特别高。在上尿路结石中,尿酸结石占了很大比例。本研究旨在通过收集 276 名确诊为肾结石和输尿管结石患者的综合生化图谱、尿液分析和 CT 扫描数据,快速可靠地识别上尿道中的尿酸结石。利用机器学习技术,目标是建立能准确识别尿酸结石的多种预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancements in Uric Acid Stone Detection: Integrating Deep Learning with CT Imaging and Clinical Assessments in the Upper Urinary Tract.

Introduction: Among upper urinary tract stones, a significant proportion comprises uric acid stones. The aim of this study was to use machine learning techniques to analyze CT scans and blood and urine test data, with the aim of establishing multiple predictive models that can accurately identify uric acid stones.

Methods: We divided 276 patients with upper urinary tract stones into two groups: 48 with uric acid stones and 228 with other types, identified using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. To distinguish the stone types, we created three types of deep learning models and extensively compared their classification performance.

Results: Among the three major types of models, considering accuracy, sensitivity, and recall, CLNC-LR, IMG-support vector machine (SVM), and FUS-SVM perform the best. The accuracy and F1 score for the three models were as follows: CLNC-LR (82.14%, 0.7813), IMG-SVM (89.29%, 0.89), and FUS-SVM (29.29%, 0.8818). The area under the curves for classes CLNC-LR, IMG-SVM, and FUS-SVM were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.99, respectively.

Conclusion: This study shows the feasibility of utilizing deep learning to assess whether urinary tract stones are uric acid stones through CT scans, blood, and urine tests. It can serve as a supplementary tool for traditional stone composition analysis, offering decision support for urologists and enhancing the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信