Mathilde Baudat, Sinno H. P. Simons, Elbert A. J. Joosten
{"title":"重复的新生儿程序性疼痛会影响应激诱导的年轻成年雌性大鼠血浆皮质酮的增加,但不会影响雄性大鼠。","authors":"Mathilde Baudat, Sinno H. P. Simons, Elbert A. J. Joosten","doi":"10.1002/dev.22478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Exposure to repetitive painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit results in long-lasting effects, especially visible after a “second hit” in adulthood. As the nociceptive system and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis interact and are vulnerable in early life, repetitive painful procedures in neonates may affect later-life HPA axis reactivity. The first aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of repetitive neonatal procedural pain on plasma corticosterone levels after mild acute stress (MAS) in young adult rats. Second, the study examined if MAS acts as a “second hit” and affects mechanical sensitivity. Fifty-two rats were either needle pricked four times a day, disturbed, or left undisturbed during the first neonatal week. At 8 weeks, the animals were subjected to MAS, and plasma was collected before (t0), after MAS (t20), and at recovery (t60). Corticosterone levels were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and mechanical sensitivity was assessed with von Frey filaments. Results demonstrate that repetitive neonatal procedural pain reduces stress-induced plasma corticosterone increase after MAS only in young adult females and not in males. Furthermore, MAS does not affect mechanical sensitivity in young adult rats. Altogether, the results suggest an age- and sex-dependent effect of repetitive neonatal procedural pain on HPA axis reprogramming.</p>","PeriodicalId":11086,"journal":{"name":"Developmental psychobiology","volume":"66 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dev.22478","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetitive neonatal procedural pain affects stress-induced plasma corticosterone increase in young adult females but not in male rats\",\"authors\":\"Mathilde Baudat, Sinno H. P. Simons, Elbert A. J. Joosten\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dev.22478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Exposure to repetitive painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit results in long-lasting effects, especially visible after a “second hit” in adulthood. As the nociceptive system and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis interact and are vulnerable in early life, repetitive painful procedures in neonates may affect later-life HPA axis reactivity. The first aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of repetitive neonatal procedural pain on plasma corticosterone levels after mild acute stress (MAS) in young adult rats. Second, the study examined if MAS acts as a “second hit” and affects mechanical sensitivity. Fifty-two rats were either needle pricked four times a day, disturbed, or left undisturbed during the first neonatal week. At 8 weeks, the animals were subjected to MAS, and plasma was collected before (t0), after MAS (t20), and at recovery (t60). Corticosterone levels were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and mechanical sensitivity was assessed with von Frey filaments. Results demonstrate that repetitive neonatal procedural pain reduces stress-induced plasma corticosterone increase after MAS only in young adult females and not in males. Furthermore, MAS does not affect mechanical sensitivity in young adult rats. Altogether, the results suggest an age- and sex-dependent effect of repetitive neonatal procedural pain on HPA axis reprogramming.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental psychobiology\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dev.22478\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental psychobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.22478\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental psychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.22478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在新生儿重症监护室接触重复性疼痛程序会产生长期影响,尤其是在成年后 "第二次接触 "后更为明显。由于痛觉系统和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴相互作用,并且在生命早期非常脆弱,因此新生儿的重复性疼痛程序可能会影响日后的 HPA 轴反应性。本研究的第一个目的是调查新生儿重复性程序性疼痛对年轻成年大鼠轻度急性应激(MAS)后血浆皮质酮水平的影响。其次,本研究还考察了轻度急性应激是否会作为 "第二次打击 "影响机械敏感性。52 只大鼠在刚出生的第一周内每天被针刺四次、受到干扰或不受干扰。8 周后,对大鼠进行机械刺激,并在机械刺激前(t0)、机械刺激后(t20)和恢复期(t60)收集血浆。用酶联免疫吸附试验分析了皮质酮水平,并用 von Frey 细丝评估了机械敏感性。结果表明,重复的新生儿程序性疼痛仅会降低 MAS 后应激诱导的血浆皮质酮的增加,而不会降低成年女性和男性的皮质酮的增加。此外,MAS 不会影响年轻成年大鼠的机械敏感性。总之,这些结果表明,新生儿重复性程序性疼痛对 HPA 轴重塑的影响与年龄和性别有关。
Repetitive neonatal procedural pain affects stress-induced plasma corticosterone increase in young adult females but not in male rats
Exposure to repetitive painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit results in long-lasting effects, especially visible after a “second hit” in adulthood. As the nociceptive system and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis interact and are vulnerable in early life, repetitive painful procedures in neonates may affect later-life HPA axis reactivity. The first aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of repetitive neonatal procedural pain on plasma corticosterone levels after mild acute stress (MAS) in young adult rats. Second, the study examined if MAS acts as a “second hit” and affects mechanical sensitivity. Fifty-two rats were either needle pricked four times a day, disturbed, or left undisturbed during the first neonatal week. At 8 weeks, the animals were subjected to MAS, and plasma was collected before (t0), after MAS (t20), and at recovery (t60). Corticosterone levels were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and mechanical sensitivity was assessed with von Frey filaments. Results demonstrate that repetitive neonatal procedural pain reduces stress-induced plasma corticosterone increase after MAS only in young adult females and not in males. Furthermore, MAS does not affect mechanical sensitivity in young adult rats. Altogether, the results suggest an age- and sex-dependent effect of repetitive neonatal procedural pain on HPA axis reprogramming.
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychobiology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers from the disciplines of psychology, biology, neuroscience, and medicine that contribute to an understanding of behavior development. Research that focuses on development in the embryo/fetus, neonate, juvenile, or adult animal and multidisciplinary research that relates behavioral development to anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, genetics, or evolution is appropriate. The journal represents a broad phylogenetic perspective on behavior development by publishing studies of invertebrates, fish, birds, humans, and other animals. The journal publishes experimental and descriptive studies whether carried out in the laboratory or field.
The journal also publishes review articles and theoretical papers that make important conceptual contributions. Special dedicated issues of Developmental Psychobiology , consisting of invited papers on a topic of general interest, may be arranged with the Editor-in-Chief.
Developmental Psychobiology also publishes Letters to the Editor, which discuss issues of general interest or material published in the journal. Letters discussing published material may correct errors, provide clarification, or offer a different point of view. Authors should consult the editors on the preparation of these contributions.