Kristian Rivera, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Juan Bullones, Susana Gorriño, Alejandro Sánchez Espino, Marcos Garcia-Guimarães, Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Patricia Irigaray, Joan Costa-Mateu, David Arroyo-Calpe, Oriol Roig-Boira, María Tornel-Cerezo, Anna Baiget-Pons, Fernando Worner, José Luis Ferreiro
{"title":"性别差异对冠状动脉手术远端桡动脉入路的可行性和安全性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Kristian Rivera, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Juan Bullones, Susana Gorriño, Alejandro Sánchez Espino, Marcos Garcia-Guimarães, Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Patricia Irigaray, Joan Costa-Mateu, David Arroyo-Calpe, Oriol Roig-Boira, María Tornel-Cerezo, Anna Baiget-Pons, Fernando Worner, José Luis Ferreiro","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional transradial access in women is associated with a lower success rate and a higher incidence of spasm compared to men. To date, the effect of sex on the performance of distal radial access (DRA) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sex on catheterization success and other performance parameters of DRA procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective three-center observational study. From August 2020 to September 2022, data from all consecutive patients who underwent DRA for coronary procedures were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 868 procedures were registered and stratified into two groups according to sex: women (n = 258) and men (n = 610). Female patients had less favorable baseline characteristics than male patients in terms of absent or weak pulse (29% vs. 17%; P < 0.001), distal radial diameter (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 mm; P < 0.001) and proximal radial diameter (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mm; P = 0.001). No differences in success rates were found in women compared to men (94.2% vs. 96.6%; P = 0.135), with a higher presence of arterial spasm in women (5.8% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.044). The preprocedural ultrasound evaluation was the only predictor of DRA success [odds ratio = 20.0 (4.739-83.333); P < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing coronary procedures, the success rate of DRA was high regardless of sex, with a higher incidence of arterial spasm in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"360-367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sex differences on the feasibility and safety of distal radial access for coronary procedures: a multicenter prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Rivera, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Juan Bullones, Susana Gorriño, Alejandro Sánchez Espino, Marcos Garcia-Guimarães, Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Patricia Irigaray, Joan Costa-Mateu, David Arroyo-Calpe, Oriol Roig-Boira, María Tornel-Cerezo, Anna Baiget-Pons, Fernando Worner, José Luis Ferreiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional transradial access in women is associated with a lower success rate and a higher incidence of spasm compared to men. To date, the effect of sex on the performance of distal radial access (DRA) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sex on catheterization success and other performance parameters of DRA procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective three-center observational study. From August 2020 to September 2022, data from all consecutive patients who underwent DRA for coronary procedures were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 868 procedures were registered and stratified into two groups according to sex: women (n = 258) and men (n = 610). Female patients had less favorable baseline characteristics than male patients in terms of absent or weak pulse (29% vs. 17%; P < 0.001), distal radial diameter (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 mm; P < 0.001) and proximal radial diameter (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mm; P = 0.001). No differences in success rates were found in women compared to men (94.2% vs. 96.6%; P = 0.135), with a higher presence of arterial spasm in women (5.8% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.044). The preprocedural ultrasound evaluation was the only predictor of DRA success [odds ratio = 20.0 (4.739-83.333); P < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing coronary procedures, the success rate of DRA was high regardless of sex, with a higher incidence of arterial spasm in women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"360-367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of sex differences on the feasibility and safety of distal radial access for coronary procedures: a multicenter prospective observational study.
Background: Conventional transradial access in women is associated with a lower success rate and a higher incidence of spasm compared to men. To date, the effect of sex on the performance of distal radial access (DRA) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sex on catheterization success and other performance parameters of DRA procedures.
Methods: This is a prospective three-center observational study. From August 2020 to September 2022, data from all consecutive patients who underwent DRA for coronary procedures were collected.
Results: A total of 868 procedures were registered and stratified into two groups according to sex: women (n = 258) and men (n = 610). Female patients had less favorable baseline characteristics than male patients in terms of absent or weak pulse (29% vs. 17%; P < 0.001), distal radial diameter (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 mm; P < 0.001) and proximal radial diameter (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mm; P = 0.001). No differences in success rates were found in women compared to men (94.2% vs. 96.6%; P = 0.135), with a higher presence of arterial spasm in women (5.8% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.044). The preprocedural ultrasound evaluation was the only predictor of DRA success [odds ratio = 20.0 (4.739-83.333); P < 0.001].
Conclusion: In patients undergoing coronary procedures, the success rate of DRA was high regardless of sex, with a higher incidence of arterial spasm in women.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.