评估尼日利亚外科医生采用循证医学的情况:能力、知识、态度、实践和障碍。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Croatian Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-29
Kehinde Oluwadiya, Anthony Olasinde, Ibironke Oluwadiya, Johnson Ogunlusi, Eyitayo Alab
{"title":"评估尼日利亚外科医生采用循证医学的情况:能力、知识、态度、实践和障碍。","authors":"Kehinde Oluwadiya, Anthony Olasinde, Ibironke Oluwadiya, Johnson Ogunlusi, Eyitayo Alab","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the competence, knowledge, attitude, and barriers to evidence-based medicine (EBM) among surgeons in southwest Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April 1 and June 30, 2019, a composite questionnaire consisting of the McAllister knowledge and attitude questionnaire, the Zwolsman barrier questionnaire, and 5 questions from the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) on competence in EBM was administered to 185 surgeons and trainees in five hospitals in southwest Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 169 respondents (57 surgeons and 112 trainees). A total of 122 (72.1%) participants reported to always/often use EBM in their practice and 47 (27.9%) to rarely/never use EBM. The majority of both groups still relied on traditional sources of information in their clinical practice. Even though self-identified EBM-users (28% points) scored significantly higher on the BQ than non-users (23.8% points), there was no difference in their performance on the McAllister and Zwolsman questionnaires. Paradoxically, those with prior training in EBM were not more likely to use EBM than those without training, and there were no significant differences in their BQ scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons in Nigeria have a high level of awareness and use of EBM, as indicated by the 72% awareness rate found in our study, but their knowledge and confidence in its application are low. Our findings indicate that the quality of EBM training in the region needs to be reevaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":10796,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Medical Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of evidence-based medicine adoption among Nigerian surgeons: competence, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers.\",\"authors\":\"Kehinde Oluwadiya, Anthony Olasinde, Ibironke Oluwadiya, Johnson Ogunlusi, Eyitayo Alab\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the competence, knowledge, attitude, and barriers to evidence-based medicine (EBM) among surgeons in southwest Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April 1 and June 30, 2019, a composite questionnaire consisting of the McAllister knowledge and attitude questionnaire, the Zwolsman barrier questionnaire, and 5 questions from the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) on competence in EBM was administered to 185 surgeons and trainees in five hospitals in southwest Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 169 respondents (57 surgeons and 112 trainees). A total of 122 (72.1%) participants reported to always/often use EBM in their practice and 47 (27.9%) to rarely/never use EBM. The majority of both groups still relied on traditional sources of information in their clinical practice. Even though self-identified EBM-users (28% points) scored significantly higher on the BQ than non-users (23.8% points), there was no difference in their performance on the McAllister and Zwolsman questionnaires. Paradoxically, those with prior training in EBM were not more likely to use EBM than those without training, and there were no significant differences in their BQ scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons in Nigeria have a high level of awareness and use of EBM, as indicated by the 72% awareness rate found in our study, but their knowledge and confidence in its application are low. Our findings indicate that the quality of EBM training in the region needs to be reevaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"3-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定尼日利亚西南部外科医生的循证医学(EBM)能力、知识、态度和障碍:2019年4月1日至6月30日期间,对尼日利亚西南部5家医院的185名外科医生和受训人员进行了综合问卷调查,其中包括McAllister知识和态度问卷、Zwolsman障碍问卷以及关于EBM能力的柏林问卷(BQ)中的5个问题:研究涉及 169 名受访者(57 名外科医生和 112 名受训人员)。共有 122 名受访者(72.1%)表示在其临床实践中始终/经常使用 EBM,47 名受访者(27.9%)表示很少/从未使用 EBM。这两个组别的大多数人在临床实践中仍然依赖传统的信息来源。尽管自我认定的 EBM 使用者(28% 分)在 BQ 中的得分明显高于非使用者(23.8% 分),但他们在 McAllister 和 Zwolsman 问卷中的表现并无差异。矛盾的是,接受过 EBM 培训的人并不比没有接受过培训的人更有可能使用 EBM,而且他们的 BQ 分数也没有显著差异:我们的研究发现,尼日利亚的外科医生对 EBM 的认识和使用程度很高,认识率为 72%,但他们对应用 EBM 的知识和信心却很低。我们的研究结果表明,该地区的 EBM 培训质量需要重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of evidence-based medicine adoption among Nigerian surgeons: competence, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers.

Aim: To determine the competence, knowledge, attitude, and barriers to evidence-based medicine (EBM) among surgeons in southwest Nigeria.

Methods: Between April 1 and June 30, 2019, a composite questionnaire consisting of the McAllister knowledge and attitude questionnaire, the Zwolsman barrier questionnaire, and 5 questions from the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) on competence in EBM was administered to 185 surgeons and trainees in five hospitals in southwest Nigeria.

Results: The study involved 169 respondents (57 surgeons and 112 trainees). A total of 122 (72.1%) participants reported to always/often use EBM in their practice and 47 (27.9%) to rarely/never use EBM. The majority of both groups still relied on traditional sources of information in their clinical practice. Even though self-identified EBM-users (28% points) scored significantly higher on the BQ than non-users (23.8% points), there was no difference in their performance on the McAllister and Zwolsman questionnaires. Paradoxically, those with prior training in EBM were not more likely to use EBM than those without training, and there were no significant differences in their BQ scores.

Conclusions: Surgeons in Nigeria have a high level of awareness and use of EBM, as indicated by the 72% awareness rate found in our study, but their knowledge and confidence in its application are low. Our findings indicate that the quality of EBM training in the region needs to be reevaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Croatian Medical Journal
Croatian Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) is an international peer reviewed journal open to scientists from all fields of biomedicine and health related research. Although CMJ welcomes all contributions that increase and expand on medical knowledge, the two areas are of the special interest: topics globally relevant for biomedicine and health and medicine in developing and emerging countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信