从巴西 Rio Doce 州立公园的参与式景观方案中可以学到什么?

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Sónia Carvalho Ribeiro, Erika Fereira, Luiz Gustavo Paula, Ramon Rodrigues, Maria Auxiliadora Drumond, Henrique Purcino, Brayan Oliveira, Vinicios Moreira, Adriana Monteiro, Braulio Fonseca, Natália Almeida, Tim O’Riordan, Úrsula Azevedo, Alfio Conti, Paulina Barbosa
{"title":"从巴西 Rio Doce 州立公园的参与式景观方案中可以学到什么?","authors":"Sónia Carvalho Ribeiro, Erika Fereira, Luiz Gustavo Paula, Ramon Rodrigues, Maria Auxiliadora Drumond, Henrique Purcino, Brayan Oliveira, Vinicios Moreira, Adriana Monteiro, Braulio Fonseca, Natália Almeida, Tim O’Riordan, Úrsula Azevedo, Alfio Conti, Paulina Barbosa","doi":"10.1007/s10980-024-01860-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Context</h3><p>The goal of this work is to describe and explain the conditions that trigger, enable or prevent the implementation of preferred land uses by local communities.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>The questions this paper addresses are as follows: Is there a set of preferred scenarios for land use change? What triggers, enables and prevents the implementation of preferred land uses? What did we learn by using participatory landscape scenarios?</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In order to answer the research questions, we synthesize knowledge from a long-term case study in the buffer zone of the Rio Doce State Park in Brazil by (1) Developing participatory landscape scenarios and spatially explicit models for exploring desirable futures and associated land uses, as seen by local communities; (2) Explaining the conditions that trigger, enable or prevent the implementation of preferred landscape scenarios; and (3) Synthesizing knowledge on research and practice for working towards preferred land use changes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Preferred scenarios for land use change are agroforestry, animal husbandry, tourism and conservation. Although there is biophysical potential and funding available through multiple social and environmental programs, the Rio Doce State Park’s institutional setting is confusing. Although preferred land use scenarios will likely be implemented, participatory landscape approaches require a new, strategic role and leadership by regional institutions. Universities need to bring in social theories and institutional analysis to educate a new generation of landscape stewards.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>We highlight the role of more responsive social agents and their representative institutions, including the changing role of university-based research and practice for working towards sustainable landscape outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54745,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Ecology","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What can be learned from using participatory landscape scenarios in Rio Doce State Park, Brazil?\",\"authors\":\"Sónia Carvalho Ribeiro, Erika Fereira, Luiz Gustavo Paula, Ramon Rodrigues, Maria Auxiliadora Drumond, Henrique Purcino, Brayan Oliveira, Vinicios Moreira, Adriana Monteiro, Braulio Fonseca, Natália Almeida, Tim O’Riordan, Úrsula Azevedo, Alfio Conti, Paulina Barbosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10980-024-01860-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Context</h3><p>The goal of this work is to describe and explain the conditions that trigger, enable or prevent the implementation of preferred land uses by local communities.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>The questions this paper addresses are as follows: Is there a set of preferred scenarios for land use change? What triggers, enables and prevents the implementation of preferred land uses? What did we learn by using participatory landscape scenarios?</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>In order to answer the research questions, we synthesize knowledge from a long-term case study in the buffer zone of the Rio Doce State Park in Brazil by (1) Developing participatory landscape scenarios and spatially explicit models for exploring desirable futures and associated land uses, as seen by local communities; (2) Explaining the conditions that trigger, enable or prevent the implementation of preferred landscape scenarios; and (3) Synthesizing knowledge on research and practice for working towards preferred land use changes.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Preferred scenarios for land use change are agroforestry, animal husbandry, tourism and conservation. Although there is biophysical potential and funding available through multiple social and environmental programs, the Rio Doce State Park’s institutional setting is confusing. Although preferred land use scenarios will likely be implemented, participatory landscape approaches require a new, strategic role and leadership by regional institutions. Universities need to bring in social theories and institutional analysis to educate a new generation of landscape stewards.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>We highlight the role of more responsive social agents and their representative institutions, including the changing role of university-based research and practice for working towards sustainable landscape outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Ecology\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01860-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01860-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景这项工作的目标是描述和解释引发、促成或阻止当地社区实施首选土地用途的条件:是否有一套首选的土地利用变化方案?是什么触发、促成或阻止了首选土地用途的实施?为了回答这些研究问题,我们综合了在巴西里约多塞州立公园缓冲区进行的一项长期案例研究的知识,具体方法是:(1) 制定参与式景观方案和空间明确模型,以探索当地社区所认为的理想未来和相关土地用途;(2) 解释引发、促成或阻止实施首选景观方案的条件;(3) 综合有关研究和实践的知识,努力实现首选土地用途的改变。结果土地利用变化的首选方案是农林业、畜牧业、旅游业和保护。虽然存在生物物理方面的潜力,并可通过多个社会和环境计划获得资金,但里约多塞州立公园的机构设置令人困惑。虽然首选的土地使用方案可能会得到实施,但参与式景观方法需要地区机构发挥新的战略作用和领导力。大学需要引入社会理论和机构分析,以教育新一代的景观管理者。结论我们强调了更具响应性的社会主体及其代表机构的作用,包括以大学为基础的研究和实践在努力实现可持续景观成果方面不断变化的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What can be learned from using participatory landscape scenarios in Rio Doce State Park, Brazil?

What can be learned from using participatory landscape scenarios in Rio Doce State Park, Brazil?

Context

The goal of this work is to describe and explain the conditions that trigger, enable or prevent the implementation of preferred land uses by local communities.

Objective

The questions this paper addresses are as follows: Is there a set of preferred scenarios for land use change? What triggers, enables and prevents the implementation of preferred land uses? What did we learn by using participatory landscape scenarios?

Methods

In order to answer the research questions, we synthesize knowledge from a long-term case study in the buffer zone of the Rio Doce State Park in Brazil by (1) Developing participatory landscape scenarios and spatially explicit models for exploring desirable futures and associated land uses, as seen by local communities; (2) Explaining the conditions that trigger, enable or prevent the implementation of preferred landscape scenarios; and (3) Synthesizing knowledge on research and practice for working towards preferred land use changes.

Results

Preferred scenarios for land use change are agroforestry, animal husbandry, tourism and conservation. Although there is biophysical potential and funding available through multiple social and environmental programs, the Rio Doce State Park’s institutional setting is confusing. Although preferred land use scenarios will likely be implemented, participatory landscape approaches require a new, strategic role and leadership by regional institutions. Universities need to bring in social theories and institutional analysis to educate a new generation of landscape stewards.

Conclusion

We highlight the role of more responsive social agents and their representative institutions, including the changing role of university-based research and practice for working towards sustainable landscape outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Ecology
Landscape Ecology 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Ecology is the flagship journal of a well-established and rapidly developing interdisciplinary science that focuses explicitly on the ecological understanding of spatial heterogeneity. Landscape Ecology draws together expertise from both biophysical and socioeconomic sciences to explore basic and applied research questions concerning the ecology, conservation, management, design/planning, and sustainability of landscapes as coupled human-environment systems. Landscape ecology studies are characterized by spatially explicit methods in which spatial attributes and arrangements of landscape elements are directly analyzed and related to ecological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信