女性对群体导向的性别歧视的主张的去合法化

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Kerry E. Spalding, Rebecca Schachtman, Cheryl R. Kaiser
{"title":"女性对群体导向的性别歧视的主张的去合法化","authors":"Kerry E. Spalding, Rebecca Schachtman, Cheryl R. Kaiser","doi":"10.1007/s11199-024-01463-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although women can experience sexism from other women (ingroup discrimination) and men (outgroup discrimination), those who claim to experience ingroup discrimination may suffer greater social costs than those who claim outgroup sexism. In three experiments (Study 1: <i>N</i> = 167; Study 2: <i>N</i> = 119; Study 3: <i>N</i> = 181), participants were randomly assigned to evaluate a woman’s claim of sexism that was perpetrated by a woman manager (ingroup discrimination) or man manager (outgroup discrimination). Women who claimed ingroup (vs. outgroup) discrimination (1) had their claims delegitimized more, (2) were perceived as greater complainers, but (3) were not perceived as less likeable (Studies 1–3). Claim of delegitimization (Studies 1–3) and violation of prototypes of discrimination (Study 3) mediated the effects of ingroup versus outgroup discrimination on perceptions of the employee as a complainer. These findings indicate that ingroup discrimination can be a pernicious barrier to women’s advancement in the workplace as these claims are viewed less seriously than more prototypical forms of outgroup discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":48425,"journal":{"name":"Sex Roles","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Delegitimization of Women’s Claims of Ingroup-Directed Sexism\",\"authors\":\"Kerry E. Spalding, Rebecca Schachtman, Cheryl R. Kaiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11199-024-01463-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although women can experience sexism from other women (ingroup discrimination) and men (outgroup discrimination), those who claim to experience ingroup discrimination may suffer greater social costs than those who claim outgroup sexism. In three experiments (Study 1: <i>N</i> = 167; Study 2: <i>N</i> = 119; Study 3: <i>N</i> = 181), participants were randomly assigned to evaluate a woman’s claim of sexism that was perpetrated by a woman manager (ingroup discrimination) or man manager (outgroup discrimination). Women who claimed ingroup (vs. outgroup) discrimination (1) had their claims delegitimized more, (2) were perceived as greater complainers, but (3) were not perceived as less likeable (Studies 1–3). Claim of delegitimization (Studies 1–3) and violation of prototypes of discrimination (Study 3) mediated the effects of ingroup versus outgroup discrimination on perceptions of the employee as a complainer. These findings indicate that ingroup discrimination can be a pernicious barrier to women’s advancement in the workplace as these claims are viewed less seriously than more prototypical forms of outgroup discrimination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sex Roles\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sex Roles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01463-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Roles","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01463-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管女性可能会遭受来自其他女性(内群歧视)和男性(外群歧视)的性别歧视,但声称遭受内群歧视的女性可能会比声称遭受外群性别歧视的女性付出更大的社会代价。在三项实验中(研究 1:N = 167;研究 2:N = 119;研究 3:N = 181),参与者被随机分配去评估一名女性声称受到女性管理者(内群歧视)或男性管理者(外群歧视)的性别歧视。声称受到群体内(与群体外)歧视的女性(1)其诉求被更多地去合法化,(2)被认为是更大的抱怨者,但(3)并没有被认为不那么讨人喜欢(研究 1-3)。主张去合法化(研究 1-3)和违反歧视原型(研究 3)在内部群体歧视与外部群体歧视对员工作为投诉者的看法的影响之间起到了中介作用。这些研究结果表明,内群体歧视可能会成为阻碍妇女在工作场所晋升的一个有害障碍,因为与更多原型形式的外群体歧视相比,这些诉求受到的重视程度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Delegitimization of Women’s Claims of Ingroup-Directed Sexism

The Delegitimization of Women’s Claims of Ingroup-Directed Sexism

Although women can experience sexism from other women (ingroup discrimination) and men (outgroup discrimination), those who claim to experience ingroup discrimination may suffer greater social costs than those who claim outgroup sexism. In three experiments (Study 1: N = 167; Study 2: N = 119; Study 3: N = 181), participants were randomly assigned to evaluate a woman’s claim of sexism that was perpetrated by a woman manager (ingroup discrimination) or man manager (outgroup discrimination). Women who claimed ingroup (vs. outgroup) discrimination (1) had their claims delegitimized more, (2) were perceived as greater complainers, but (3) were not perceived as less likeable (Studies 1–3). Claim of delegitimization (Studies 1–3) and violation of prototypes of discrimination (Study 3) mediated the effects of ingroup versus outgroup discrimination on perceptions of the employee as a complainer. These findings indicate that ingroup discrimination can be a pernicious barrier to women’s advancement in the workplace as these claims are viewed less seriously than more prototypical forms of outgroup discrimination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sex Roles
Sex Roles Multiple-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Sex Roles: A Journal of Research is a global, multidisciplinary, scholarly, social and behavioral science journal with a feminist perspective. It publishes original research reports as well as original theoretical papers and conceptual review articles that explore how gender organizes people’s lives and their surrounding worlds, including gender identities, belief systems, representations, interactions, relations, organizations, institutions, and statuses. The range of topics covered is broad and dynamic, including but not limited to the study of gendered attitudes, stereotyping, and sexism; gendered contexts, culture, and power; the intersections of gender with race, class, sexual orientation, age, and other statuses and identities; body image; violence; gender (including masculinities) and feminist identities; human sexuality; communication studies; work and organizations; gendered development across the life span or life course; mental, physical, and reproductive health and health care; sports; interpersonal relationships and attraction; activism and social change; economic, political, and legal inequities; and methodological challenges and innovations in doing gender research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信