安抚不满意者还是取悦满意者?管理者对正面和负面评论的回应对顾客评分和财务业绩的影响

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
{"title":"安抚不满意者还是取悦满意者?管理者对正面和负面评论的回应对顾客评分和财务业绩的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11747-024-01010-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Managerial responses (MRs) have gained increasing attention as an important intervention strategy for addressing online customer reviews. This study seeks to answer the question of how a firm should prioritize responding to customers’ positive reviews (MR-P) and negative reviews (MR-N). We examine the differential effect of the MR-P ratio and the MR-N ratio on subsequent customer review ratings and a firm’s financial performance. Our findings show that while the MR-P ratio leads to an increase in subsequent customer review ratings and revenue, the MR-N ratio results in a decrease in customer review ratings and revenue in the short run, but contributes to improvements in these metrics in the long run. Furthermore, we find that the influence of MR-P and MR-N on subsequent review ratings diminishes among firms whose MRs contain highly similar content and firms whose competitors actively create MRs. This research not only advances our understanding of the managerial response literature but also provides valuable guidance for firms seeking to maximize the effectiveness of their MR campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soothing the unsatisfied or pleasing the satisfied? The effects of managerial responses to positive versus negative reviews on customer ratings and financial performance\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11747-024-01010-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Managerial responses (MRs) have gained increasing attention as an important intervention strategy for addressing online customer reviews. This study seeks to answer the question of how a firm should prioritize responding to customers’ positive reviews (MR-P) and negative reviews (MR-N). We examine the differential effect of the MR-P ratio and the MR-N ratio on subsequent customer review ratings and a firm’s financial performance. Our findings show that while the MR-P ratio leads to an increase in subsequent customer review ratings and revenue, the MR-N ratio results in a decrease in customer review ratings and revenue in the short run, but contributes to improvements in these metrics in the long run. Furthermore, we find that the influence of MR-P and MR-N on subsequent review ratings diminishes among firms whose MRs contain highly similar content and firms whose competitors actively create MRs. This research not only advances our understanding of the managerial response literature but also provides valuable guidance for firms seeking to maximize the effectiveness of their MR campaigns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01010-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01010-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 管理者回应(MRs)作为处理在线客户评论的一种重要干预策略,受到越来越多的关注。本研究试图回答这样一个问题:企业应该如何优先回应客户的正面评论(MR-P)和负面评论(MR-N)。我们研究了 MR-P 比率和 MR-N 比率对后续客户评论评级和公司财务业绩的不同影响。我们的研究结果表明,MR-P 比率会导致后续客户评论评级和收入的增加,而 MR-N 比率则会在短期内导致客户评论评级和收入的减少,但从长远来看却有助于改善这些指标。此外,我们还发现,MR-P 和 MR-N 对后续评论评级的影响在 MR 内容高度相似的企业和竞争对手积极创建 MR 的企业中会减弱。这项研究不仅加深了我们对管理回应文献的理解,还为企业寻求最大化其管理回应活动的有效性提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soothing the unsatisfied or pleasing the satisfied? The effects of managerial responses to positive versus negative reviews on customer ratings and financial performance

Abstract

Managerial responses (MRs) have gained increasing attention as an important intervention strategy for addressing online customer reviews. This study seeks to answer the question of how a firm should prioritize responding to customers’ positive reviews (MR-P) and negative reviews (MR-N). We examine the differential effect of the MR-P ratio and the MR-N ratio on subsequent customer review ratings and a firm’s financial performance. Our findings show that while the MR-P ratio leads to an increase in subsequent customer review ratings and revenue, the MR-N ratio results in a decrease in customer review ratings and revenue in the short run, but contributes to improvements in these metrics in the long run. Furthermore, we find that the influence of MR-P and MR-N on subsequent review ratings diminishes among firms whose MRs contain highly similar content and firms whose competitors actively create MRs. This research not only advances our understanding of the managerial response literature but also provides valuable guidance for firms seeking to maximize the effectiveness of their MR campaigns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信