对男性难治性精神分裂症患者进行导航和个体α-峰频引导经颅磁刺激。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Print Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1503/jpn.230063
Heli Tuppurainen, Sara Määttä, Mervi Könönen, Petro Julkunen, Hannu Kautiainen, Soile Hyvärinen, Olli Vaurio, Mikko Joensuu, Matti Vanhanen, Kati Aho-Mustonen, Esa Mervaala, Jari Tiihonen
{"title":"对男性难治性精神分裂症患者进行导航和个体α-峰频引导经颅磁刺激。","authors":"Heli Tuppurainen, Sara Määttä, Mervi Könönen, Petro Julkunen, Hannu Kautiainen, Soile Hyvärinen, Olli Vaurio, Mikko Joensuu, Matti Vanhanen, Kati Aho-Mustonen, Esa Mervaala, Jari Tiihonen","doi":"10.1503/jpn.230063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous electroencephalography (EEG) studies have indicated altered brain oscillatory α-band activity in schizophrenia, and treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) using individualized α-frequency has shown therapeutic effects. Magnetic resonance imaging-based neuronavigation methods allow stimulation of a specific cortical region and improve targeting of rTMS; therefore, we sought to study the efficacy of navigated, individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS (αTMS) on treatment-refractory schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited medication-refractory male patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in this doubleblind, sham-controlled study. We randomized patients to a 3-week course of either active αTMS or sham stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We assessed participants with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) at baseline and after treatment. We conducted a follow-up assessment with the PANSS 3 months after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 44 patients. After treatment, we observed a significantly higher PANSS total score (<i>p</i> = 0.029), PANSS general psychopathology score (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and PANSS 5-factor model cognitive-disorganized factor score (<i>p</i> = 0.011) in the αTMS group than the sham group. In addition, the CGI-Improvement score was significantly higher among those who received αTMS compared with sham stimulation (<i>p</i> = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The limited number of study participants included only male patients. Depression was not formally evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Navigated αTMS to the left DLPFC reduced total, general psychopathological, and cognitive-disorganized symptoms of schizophrenia. These results provide evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS in treatment-refractory schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT01941251; ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"49 2","pages":"E87-E95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigated and individual α-peak-frequency-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation in male patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"Heli Tuppurainen, Sara Määttä, Mervi Könönen, Petro Julkunen, Hannu Kautiainen, Soile Hyvärinen, Olli Vaurio, Mikko Joensuu, Matti Vanhanen, Kati Aho-Mustonen, Esa Mervaala, Jari Tiihonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/jpn.230063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous electroencephalography (EEG) studies have indicated altered brain oscillatory α-band activity in schizophrenia, and treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) using individualized α-frequency has shown therapeutic effects. Magnetic resonance imaging-based neuronavigation methods allow stimulation of a specific cortical region and improve targeting of rTMS; therefore, we sought to study the efficacy of navigated, individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS (αTMS) on treatment-refractory schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited medication-refractory male patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in this doubleblind, sham-controlled study. We randomized patients to a 3-week course of either active αTMS or sham stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We assessed participants with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) at baseline and after treatment. We conducted a follow-up assessment with the PANSS 3 months after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 44 patients. After treatment, we observed a significantly higher PANSS total score (<i>p</i> = 0.029), PANSS general psychopathology score (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and PANSS 5-factor model cognitive-disorganized factor score (<i>p</i> = 0.011) in the αTMS group than the sham group. In addition, the CGI-Improvement score was significantly higher among those who received αTMS compared with sham stimulation (<i>p</i> = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The limited number of study participants included only male patients. Depression was not formally evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Navigated αTMS to the left DLPFC reduced total, general psychopathological, and cognitive-disorganized symptoms of schizophrenia. These results provide evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS in treatment-refractory schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT01941251; ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"E87-E95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以往的脑电图(EEG)研究表明,精神分裂症患者的大脑振荡α波段活动发生了改变,使用个性化α频率的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗已显示出治疗效果。基于磁共振成像的神经导航方法可以刺激特定的皮质区域,提高经颅磁刺激的靶向性;因此,我们试图研究导航的个体化α峰值频率引导经颅磁刺激(αTMS)对治疗难治性精神分裂症的疗效:在这项双盲假对照研究中,我们招募了药物难治性精神分裂症或情感分裂症男性患者。我们随机对患者进行了为期3周的主动αTMS或假刺激左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)。我们在基线和治疗后使用阳性与阴性综合量表(PANSS)和临床总体印象量表(CGI)对参与者进行了评估。干预3个月后,我们使用PANSS进行了随访评估:我们共纳入了 44 名患者。治疗后,我们观察到αTMS组的PANSS总分(p = 0.029)、PANSS一般精神病理学得分(p = 0.027)和PANSS 5因子模型认知混乱因子得分(p = 0.011)均明显高于假组。此外,与假刺激相比,接受αTMS刺激者的CGI-Improvement评分明显更高(p = 0.048):局限性:研究参与者人数有限,仅包括男性患者。结论:α经颅磁刺激的导航效果非常好:结论:对左侧DLPFC进行导航α经频磁刺激可减轻精神分裂症的总症状、一般精神病理症状和认知紊乱症状。这些结果为个体α峰值频率引导经颅磁刺激治疗难治性精神分裂症的疗效提供了证据:临床试验注册:NCT01941251;ClinicalTrials.gov.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigated and individual α-peak-frequency-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation in male patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

Background: Previous electroencephalography (EEG) studies have indicated altered brain oscillatory α-band activity in schizophrenia, and treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) using individualized α-frequency has shown therapeutic effects. Magnetic resonance imaging-based neuronavigation methods allow stimulation of a specific cortical region and improve targeting of rTMS; therefore, we sought to study the efficacy of navigated, individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS (αTMS) on treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

Methods: We recruited medication-refractory male patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in this doubleblind, sham-controlled study. We randomized patients to a 3-week course of either active αTMS or sham stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We assessed participants with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) at baseline and after treatment. We conducted a follow-up assessment with the PANSS 3 months after intervention.

Results: We included 44 patients. After treatment, we observed a significantly higher PANSS total score (p = 0.029), PANSS general psychopathology score (p = 0.027) and PANSS 5-factor model cognitive-disorganized factor score (p = 0.011) in the αTMS group than the sham group. In addition, the CGI-Improvement score was significantly higher among those who received αTMS compared with sham stimulation (p = 0.048).

Limitations: The limited number of study participants included only male patients. Depression was not formally evaluated.

Conclusion: Navigated αTMS to the left DLPFC reduced total, general psychopathological, and cognitive-disorganized symptoms of schizophrenia. These results provide evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS in treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

Clinical trial registration: NCT01941251; ClinicalTrials.gov.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信