简单而基本的家庭锻炼计划(包括由护理人员在家中实施的小儿按摩)在治疗痉挛性脑瘫儿童方面的效果:随机对照试验。

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Qamar Mahmood, Shaista Habibullah, Hazrat Ullah Aurakzai
{"title":"简单而基本的家庭锻炼计划(包括由护理人员在家中实施的小儿按摩)在治疗痉挛性脑瘫儿童方面的效果:随机对照试验。","authors":"Qamar Mahmood, Shaista Habibullah, Hazrat Ullah Aurakzai","doi":"10.3233/PRM-220135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of simple and basic home-based exercise programs (HEPs), including pediatric massage (PM), executed by caregivers at their homes in the management of children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-eight children with spastic CP (diplegia) aged 4-12 years were randomly assigned to PM and HEP groups for a randomized controlled trial continuing from November 01, 2021 to June 2022. Parents provided home-based exercises to both groups, five times a week for 12 weeks. However, the PM group was additionally provided with PM. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) were used for evaluation of spasticity and gross motor activity at baseline as well as after six and 12 weeks of intervention. Comparative analysis of data was carried out with SPSS-20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age in HEP and PM groups was 6.65±2.12 and 7.09±2.22 years respectively. Data revealed homogeneity of both groups at the beginning of study. The PM group showed a statistically significant decrease in MAS scores after six and 12 weeks of intervention (p < 0.05) when compared with the HEP group, but similar changes did not happen in GMFM scores and GMFCS levels. However, comparative analysis revealed statistically significant change in GMFM scores and GMFCS levels (p < 0.05) when compared from baseline to 12 weeks of intervention in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PM along with HEPs can be used effectively to reduce spasticity and to improve gross motor ability if performed for a period of at least six and 12 weeks respectively. In conjunction with HEPs, PM has better outcomes in the management of tone and movement disorders of spastic CP than HEPs alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10977413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of simple and basic home-based exercise programs including pediatric massage executed by caregivers at their homes in the management of children with spastic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Qamar Mahmood, Shaista Habibullah, Hazrat Ullah Aurakzai\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/PRM-220135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of simple and basic home-based exercise programs (HEPs), including pediatric massage (PM), executed by caregivers at their homes in the management of children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-eight children with spastic CP (diplegia) aged 4-12 years were randomly assigned to PM and HEP groups for a randomized controlled trial continuing from November 01, 2021 to June 2022. Parents provided home-based exercises to both groups, five times a week for 12 weeks. However, the PM group was additionally provided with PM. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) were used for evaluation of spasticity and gross motor activity at baseline as well as after six and 12 weeks of intervention. Comparative analysis of data was carried out with SPSS-20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age in HEP and PM groups was 6.65±2.12 and 7.09±2.22 years respectively. Data revealed homogeneity of both groups at the beginning of study. The PM group showed a statistically significant decrease in MAS scores after six and 12 weeks of intervention (p < 0.05) when compared with the HEP group, but similar changes did not happen in GMFM scores and GMFCS levels. However, comparative analysis revealed statistically significant change in GMFM scores and GMFCS levels (p < 0.05) when compared from baseline to 12 weeks of intervention in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PM along with HEPs can be used effectively to reduce spasticity and to improve gross motor ability if performed for a period of at least six and 12 weeks respectively. In conjunction with HEPs, PM has better outcomes in the management of tone and movement disorders of spastic CP than HEPs alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"97-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10977413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-220135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-220135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估简单而基本的家庭锻炼计划(HEP),包括小儿按摩(PM),由护理人员在家中实施对痉挛性脑瘫(CP)儿童进行管理的有效性:方法:在 2021 年 11 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月期间进行的随机对照试验中,68 名 4-12 岁痉挛性脑瘫(偏瘫)儿童被随机分配到 PM 组和 HEP 组。家长为两组儿童提供每周 5 次、为期 12 周的家庭锻炼。不过,PM 组还额外提供了 PM。在基线以及干预 6 周和 12 周后,采用改良阿什沃斯量表(MAS)、粗大运动功能测量法(GMFM-88)和粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)对痉挛和粗大运动活动进行评估。使用 SPSS-20 对数据进行比较分析:结果:HEP 组和 PM 组的平均年龄分别为 6.65±2.12 岁和 7.09±2.22 岁。数据显示两组在研究开始时具有同质性。与 HEP 组相比,PM 组在干预 6 周和 12 周后的 MAS 分数有了统计学意义上的显著下降(P < 0.05),但 GMFM 分数和 GMFCS 水平没有发生类似的变化。然而,比较分析表明,两组的 GMFM 评分和 GMFCS 水平从基线到干预 12 周之间的比较有显著的统计学变化(p < 0.05):结论: PM与HEPs如果分别持续至少6周和12周,可有效缓解痉挛并改善大运动能力。在治疗痉挛性脊柱侧弯症的张力和运动障碍方面,PM 与 HEPs 联合使用比单独使用 HEPs 效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of simple and basic home-based exercise programs including pediatric massage executed by caregivers at their homes in the management of children with spastic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of simple and basic home-based exercise programs (HEPs), including pediatric massage (PM), executed by caregivers at their homes in the management of children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods: Sixty-eight children with spastic CP (diplegia) aged 4-12 years were randomly assigned to PM and HEP groups for a randomized controlled trial continuing from November 01, 2021 to June 2022. Parents provided home-based exercises to both groups, five times a week for 12 weeks. However, the PM group was additionally provided with PM. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) were used for evaluation of spasticity and gross motor activity at baseline as well as after six and 12 weeks of intervention. Comparative analysis of data was carried out with SPSS-20.

Results: Mean age in HEP and PM groups was 6.65±2.12 and 7.09±2.22 years respectively. Data revealed homogeneity of both groups at the beginning of study. The PM group showed a statistically significant decrease in MAS scores after six and 12 weeks of intervention (p < 0.05) when compared with the HEP group, but similar changes did not happen in GMFM scores and GMFCS levels. However, comparative analysis revealed statistically significant change in GMFM scores and GMFCS levels (p < 0.05) when compared from baseline to 12 weeks of intervention in both groups.

Conclusion: PM along with HEPs can be used effectively to reduce spasticity and to improve gross motor ability if performed for a period of at least six and 12 weeks respectively. In conjunction with HEPs, PM has better outcomes in the management of tone and movement disorders of spastic CP than HEPs alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信