为美国农场供电:Richard F. Hirsh 著的《被忽视的农村电气化起源》(评论)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Abby Spinak
{"title":"为美国农场供电:Richard F. Hirsh 著的《被忽视的农村电气化起源》(评论)","authors":"Abby Spinak","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a920540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Powering American Farms: The Overlooked Origins of Rural Electrification</em> by Richard F. Hirsh <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Abby Spinak (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Powering American Farms: The Overlooked Origins of Rural Electrification</em> By Richard F. Hirsh. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2022. Pp. 400. <p>It's hard to imagine being afraid of a refrigerator, but if your neighbor had died from the chemical leaks that plagued early models, you likely would have been. Even so, you might have been optimistic about crop yields from electrically stimulated soil. Or your time might have been better spent \"lobbying for better roads [over] electric lines\" (p. 249). As Richard Hirsh cautions, histories of early electrification programs \"should not reflect today's appreciation of electricity but rather the attitudes of people living almost a century ago\" (p. 252).</p> <p><em>Powering American Farms</em> is an explicitly revisionist history that sheds new light on private power companies' contributions to rural electrification in the United States. Hirsh rightly notes that energy historians have privileged the institutional narratives of the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) <strong>[End Page 378]</strong> and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)—New Deal–era federal projects that spurred rapid power extension out to (as the story goes) anxiously waiting ruralites. In this narrative, federal agencies stepped in after frustrating negotiations with power companies left rural America in the dark, artificially depressing the countryside and spurring urban migration.</p> <p>By contrast, Hirsh shows, the REA/TVA built on years of study by private utility coalitions. Private experiments extending power to sparsely populated communities and using electricity on farms were especially impressive, Hirsh argues, given the arm's-length interest in electricity at the time. Hirsh doesn't excuse the \"morally and legally ambiguous tactics\" that have provided fodder for more critical histories of the power industry (p. 227). But, he argues, these narratives obscure the work that private companies did prior to—as well as alongside—government programs. <em>Powering American Farms</em> thus adds a utility-centered perspective to a small but growing literature that contests the common narrative of the REA/TVA as grassroots electric democracy and instead takes them seriously as federal bureaucracies with shifting national agendas (e.g., David Nye, <em>Electrifying America</em>, 1990; Leah Glaser, <em>Electrifying the Rural American West</em>, 2009; Brent Cebul, \"Creative Competition,\" 2018).</p> <p>Hirsh has been writing about the electricity industry for decades, and his deep familiarity with American electrification archives, both public and private, shines bright in this latest book: in a wealth of new stories about farmers' and agricultural engineers' experiments with energy sources and practices; the comparative politics of state-level rural utility regulation; and, of course, a deep dive into the private power sector's rural electrification projects prior to 1935, particularly the industry's Committee on the Relation of Electricity to Agriculture (CREA) and subsidiary state-level CREAs.</p> <p>But Hirsh is also attentive to method. Historians of technology who have been influenced by Thomas Hughes should read this book carefully for Hirsh's extension of Hughes's theories of systems momentum (pp. 8–10). Of equal value is his attention to counterfactual history—those \"viable choices at moments of indeterminacy\" through which \"the electrical landscape of nonurban Americans might have evolved differently, but also as 'logically'\" (pp. 91–92). For example, Hirsh documents how rural electricity was as likely to become a system of distributed generation as a network of far-flung transmission lines connected to central station power. Nor does he find it inevitable that electricity would come to be associated primarily with farm efficiency. Both of these practices, he argues, reflect the economic ideologies perpetuated by power magnates and federal agents more so than rural ideas of electric modernity.</p> <p>Such counterfactuals have poignant environmental implications. For example, Hirsh shares a 1914 political cartoon \"Time to Wake Up,\" in which a more \"efficient\" future dawns over a dusty Plains farmstead. Rays of new sun shine on promises of \"alfalfa\" and \"dairying\" (p. 49), both of which have since come under critique for accelerating groundwater depletion (see Lucas <strong>[End Page 379]</strong> Bessire, <em>Running Out</em>, 2021). <em>Powering American Farms</em> thus invites questions of whether different electro-agricultural logics could have produced more sustainable rural landscapes. Hirsh is not aiming to write environmental history, but he...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"241 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Powering American Farms: The Overlooked Origins of Rural Electrification by Richard F. Hirsh (review)\",\"authors\":\"Abby Spinak\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a920540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Powering American Farms: The Overlooked Origins of Rural Electrification</em> by Richard F. Hirsh <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Abby Spinak (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Powering American Farms: The Overlooked Origins of Rural Electrification</em> By Richard F. Hirsh. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2022. Pp. 400. <p>It's hard to imagine being afraid of a refrigerator, but if your neighbor had died from the chemical leaks that plagued early models, you likely would have been. Even so, you might have been optimistic about crop yields from electrically stimulated soil. Or your time might have been better spent \\\"lobbying for better roads [over] electric lines\\\" (p. 249). As Richard Hirsh cautions, histories of early electrification programs \\\"should not reflect today's appreciation of electricity but rather the attitudes of people living almost a century ago\\\" (p. 252).</p> <p><em>Powering American Farms</em> is an explicitly revisionist history that sheds new light on private power companies' contributions to rural electrification in the United States. Hirsh rightly notes that energy historians have privileged the institutional narratives of the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) <strong>[End Page 378]</strong> and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)—New Deal–era federal projects that spurred rapid power extension out to (as the story goes) anxiously waiting ruralites. In this narrative, federal agencies stepped in after frustrating negotiations with power companies left rural America in the dark, artificially depressing the countryside and spurring urban migration.</p> <p>By contrast, Hirsh shows, the REA/TVA built on years of study by private utility coalitions. Private experiments extending power to sparsely populated communities and using electricity on farms were especially impressive, Hirsh argues, given the arm's-length interest in electricity at the time. Hirsh doesn't excuse the \\\"morally and legally ambiguous tactics\\\" that have provided fodder for more critical histories of the power industry (p. 227). But, he argues, these narratives obscure the work that private companies did prior to—as well as alongside—government programs. <em>Powering American Farms</em> thus adds a utility-centered perspective to a small but growing literature that contests the common narrative of the REA/TVA as grassroots electric democracy and instead takes them seriously as federal bureaucracies with shifting national agendas (e.g., David Nye, <em>Electrifying America</em>, 1990; Leah Glaser, <em>Electrifying the Rural American West</em>, 2009; Brent Cebul, \\\"Creative Competition,\\\" 2018).</p> <p>Hirsh has been writing about the electricity industry for decades, and his deep familiarity with American electrification archives, both public and private, shines bright in this latest book: in a wealth of new stories about farmers' and agricultural engineers' experiments with energy sources and practices; the comparative politics of state-level rural utility regulation; and, of course, a deep dive into the private power sector's rural electrification projects prior to 1935, particularly the industry's Committee on the Relation of Electricity to Agriculture (CREA) and subsidiary state-level CREAs.</p> <p>But Hirsh is also attentive to method. Historians of technology who have been influenced by Thomas Hughes should read this book carefully for Hirsh's extension of Hughes's theories of systems momentum (pp. 8–10). Of equal value is his attention to counterfactual history—those \\\"viable choices at moments of indeterminacy\\\" through which \\\"the electrical landscape of nonurban Americans might have evolved differently, but also as 'logically'\\\" (pp. 91–92). For example, Hirsh documents how rural electricity was as likely to become a system of distributed generation as a network of far-flung transmission lines connected to central station power. Nor does he find it inevitable that electricity would come to be associated primarily with farm efficiency. Both of these practices, he argues, reflect the economic ideologies perpetuated by power magnates and federal agents more so than rural ideas of electric modernity.</p> <p>Such counterfactuals have poignant environmental implications. For example, Hirsh shares a 1914 political cartoon \\\"Time to Wake Up,\\\" in which a more \\\"efficient\\\" future dawns over a dusty Plains farmstead. Rays of new sun shine on promises of \\\"alfalfa\\\" and \\\"dairying\\\" (p. 49), both of which have since come under critique for accelerating groundwater depletion (see Lucas <strong>[End Page 379]</strong> Bessire, <em>Running Out</em>, 2021). <em>Powering American Farms</em> thus invites questions of whether different electro-agricultural logics could have produced more sustainable rural landscapes. Hirsh is not aiming to write environmental history, but he...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"241 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a920540\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a920540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评论者: 为美国农场供电:理查德-F.-赫什(Richard F. Hirsh)著,艾比-斯皮纳克(Abby Spinak)(简历):《为美国农场供电:被忽视的农村电气化起源》(Powering American Farms:被忽视的农村电气化起源 作者:Richard F. Hirsh。巴尔的摩:约翰-霍普金斯大学出版社,2022 年。页码400.很难想象你会害怕冰箱,但如果你的邻居死于困扰早期冰箱的化学泄漏,你很可能会害怕。即便如此,你也可能会对电刺激土壤的作物产量持乐观态度。或者说,你把时间花在 "游说修建更好的道路(而不是电线)"上会更好(第 249 页)。正如理查德-希尔施(Richard Hirsh)所提醒的,早期电气化计划的历史 "不应反映今天对电力的认识,而应反映近一个世纪前人们的生活态度"(第 252 页)。为美国农场供电》是一部明显具有修正主义色彩的历史,它为私营电力公司对美国农村电气化的贡献提供了新的视角。Hirsh 正确地指出,能源史学家们对农村电气化管理局 (REA) [第 378 页完] 和田纳西河流域管理局 (TVA) 的机构叙事给予了特权--这些新政时期的联邦项目推动了电力向焦急等待的农村居民快速延伸(如故事所述)。在这种说法中,联邦机构在与电力公司的谈判受挫后介入,使美国农村处于黑暗之中,人为地压抑了农村,刺激了城市移民。相比之下,Hirsh 指出,REA/TVA 建立在私营公用事业联盟多年研究的基础之上。希尔施认为,考虑到当时人们对电力的兴趣不大,将电力延伸到人口稀少的社区以及在农场使用电力的私人实验尤其令人印象深刻。Hirsh 并没有为 "道德和法律上模棱两可的策略 "开脱,这些策略为电力行业的批判性历史提供了素材(第 227 页)。但他认为,这些叙述掩盖了私营公司在政府项目之前以及与政府项目并行开展的工作。因此,《为美国农场供电》为规模虽小但却在不断增长的文献增添了一个以公用事业为中心的视角,这些文献质疑将 REA/TVA 描述为草根电力民主的常见说法,而是将它们严肃地视为具有不断变化的国家议程的联邦官僚机构(例如,David Nye,《Electrifying America》,1990 年;Leah Glaser,《Electrifying the Rural American West》,2009 年;Brent Cebul,《Creative Competition》,2018 年)。几十年来,希尔施一直在撰写有关电力行业的文章,他对美国电气化档案(包括公共档案和私人档案)的深入了解在这本新书中大放异彩:书中有大量关于农民和农业工程师在能源和实践方面进行试验的新故事;州一级农村公用事业监管的比较政治;当然,还有对 1935 年之前私营电力部门农村电气化项目的深入研究,特别是该行业的电力与农业关系委员会(CREA)和州一级的附属 CREA。不过,Hirsh 也很注重方法。受托马斯-休斯(Thomas Hughes)影响的技术史学家应该仔细阅读本书,因为希尔施对休斯的系统动力理论进行了扩展(第 8-10 页)。同样有价值的是他对反事实历史的关注--那些 "不确定时刻的可行选择",通过这些选择,"非城市美国人的电气景观可能会以不同的方式发展,但也同样'合乎逻辑'"(第 91-92 页)。例如,Hirsh 记录了农村电力是如何成为一个分布式发电系统,以及如何成为一个由遥远的输电线路网络连接到中央发电站的。他也不认为电力会不可避免地主要与农业效率联系在一起。他认为,这两种做法都反映了电力巨头和联邦机构所延续的经济意识形态,而不是农村的电力现代化理念。这种反事实具有深刻的环境影响。例如,Hirsh 分享了一幅 1914 年的政治漫画 "醒来的时刻",在这幅漫画中,尘土飞扬的平原农庄迎来了一个更加 "高效 "的未来。新的阳光照耀着 "紫花苜蓿 "和 "乳制品 "的前景(第 49 页),这两种作物后来都因加速地下水枯竭而受到批评(见卢卡斯 [第379页完] 贝西尔,《枯竭》,2021 年)。因此,《为美国农场供电》引出了这样一个问题:不同的电子农业逻辑是否可以产生更可持续的乡村景观?希尔施的目标并不是撰写环境史,但他...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Powering American Farms: The Overlooked Origins of Rural Electrification by Richard F. Hirsh (review)

Reviewed by:

  • Powering American Farms: The Overlooked Origins of Rural Electrification by Richard F. Hirsh
  • Abby Spinak (bio)
Powering American Farms: The Overlooked Origins of Rural Electrification By Richard F. Hirsh. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2022. Pp. 400.

It's hard to imagine being afraid of a refrigerator, but if your neighbor had died from the chemical leaks that plagued early models, you likely would have been. Even so, you might have been optimistic about crop yields from electrically stimulated soil. Or your time might have been better spent "lobbying for better roads [over] electric lines" (p. 249). As Richard Hirsh cautions, histories of early electrification programs "should not reflect today's appreciation of electricity but rather the attitudes of people living almost a century ago" (p. 252).

Powering American Farms is an explicitly revisionist history that sheds new light on private power companies' contributions to rural electrification in the United States. Hirsh rightly notes that energy historians have privileged the institutional narratives of the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) [End Page 378] and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)—New Deal–era federal projects that spurred rapid power extension out to (as the story goes) anxiously waiting ruralites. In this narrative, federal agencies stepped in after frustrating negotiations with power companies left rural America in the dark, artificially depressing the countryside and spurring urban migration.

By contrast, Hirsh shows, the REA/TVA built on years of study by private utility coalitions. Private experiments extending power to sparsely populated communities and using electricity on farms were especially impressive, Hirsh argues, given the arm's-length interest in electricity at the time. Hirsh doesn't excuse the "morally and legally ambiguous tactics" that have provided fodder for more critical histories of the power industry (p. 227). But, he argues, these narratives obscure the work that private companies did prior to—as well as alongside—government programs. Powering American Farms thus adds a utility-centered perspective to a small but growing literature that contests the common narrative of the REA/TVA as grassroots electric democracy and instead takes them seriously as federal bureaucracies with shifting national agendas (e.g., David Nye, Electrifying America, 1990; Leah Glaser, Electrifying the Rural American West, 2009; Brent Cebul, "Creative Competition," 2018).

Hirsh has been writing about the electricity industry for decades, and his deep familiarity with American electrification archives, both public and private, shines bright in this latest book: in a wealth of new stories about farmers' and agricultural engineers' experiments with energy sources and practices; the comparative politics of state-level rural utility regulation; and, of course, a deep dive into the private power sector's rural electrification projects prior to 1935, particularly the industry's Committee on the Relation of Electricity to Agriculture (CREA) and subsidiary state-level CREAs.

But Hirsh is also attentive to method. Historians of technology who have been influenced by Thomas Hughes should read this book carefully for Hirsh's extension of Hughes's theories of systems momentum (pp. 8–10). Of equal value is his attention to counterfactual history—those "viable choices at moments of indeterminacy" through which "the electrical landscape of nonurban Americans might have evolved differently, but also as 'logically'" (pp. 91–92). For example, Hirsh documents how rural electricity was as likely to become a system of distributed generation as a network of far-flung transmission lines connected to central station power. Nor does he find it inevitable that electricity would come to be associated primarily with farm efficiency. Both of these practices, he argues, reflect the economic ideologies perpetuated by power magnates and federal agents more so than rural ideas of electric modernity.

Such counterfactuals have poignant environmental implications. For example, Hirsh shares a 1914 political cartoon "Time to Wake Up," in which a more "efficient" future dawns over a dusty Plains farmstead. Rays of new sun shine on promises of "alfalfa" and "dairying" (p. 49), both of which have since come under critique for accelerating groundwater depletion (see Lucas [End Page 379] Bessire, Running Out, 2021). Powering American Farms thus invites questions of whether different electro-agricultural logics could have produced more sustainable rural landscapes. Hirsh is not aiming to write environmental history, but he...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信