环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效如何决定投资组合?来自金砖国家的新经验证据

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Zhichao Yu , Umar Farooq , Mohammad Mahtab Alam , Jiapeng Dai
{"title":"环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效如何决定投资组合?来自金砖国家的新经验证据","authors":"Zhichao Yu ,&nbsp;Umar Farooq ,&nbsp;Mohammad Mahtab Alam ,&nbsp;Jiapeng Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.bir.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles into investment decisions has garnered increased attention in the business landscape. Thus, the current study aims to investigate the intricate interplay between ESG performance and investment patterns (capital vs. environmental) within the corporate setting. This study sought to identify the influence of ESG scores on earnings-driven investments (capital investment) and environmental investments, exploring potential trade-offs and implications for corporate decision-making. The analysis was conducted by sampling nonfinancial sector enterprises from BRICS nations from 2010 to 2022. For regression analysis, system generalized method of moments (GMM) was employed to address endogeneity concerns. The findings revealed a significant positive correlation between ESG performance and earnings-driven investments (capital investment). However, a negative relationship emerged between ESG scores and environmental investments, signifying potential trade-offs between financial profitability and dedicated environmental spending within companies. Other variables, including firm size, debt ratios, cash holdings, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, significantly impacted investment patterns. The study’s outcomes provide valuable guidance for corporate managers navigating sustainable investment strategies. Emphasizing earnings-driven investments, particularly capital projects, with a high ESG focus could align financial objectives with sustainable practices, enhancing long-term viability and stakeholder trust. The study’s insights contribute to the broader discourse on responsible corporate practices and sustainability. The findings shed light on the complexities of balancing financial objectives with environmental responsibilities, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach reconciling financial goals with ESG commitments. This study contributes novel insights by dissecting the nuanced relationships between ESG performance and investment decisions. The analysis provides a novel perspective on companies' trade-offs between the investment mix and pursuing ESG performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46690,"journal":{"name":"Borsa Istanbul Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000279/pdfft?md5=1707693a2e9e39603494fd6a869ddda0&pid=1-s2.0-S2214845024000279-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance determine investment mix? New empirical evidence from BRICS\",\"authors\":\"Zhichao Yu ,&nbsp;Umar Farooq ,&nbsp;Mohammad Mahtab Alam ,&nbsp;Jiapeng Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bir.2024.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles into investment decisions has garnered increased attention in the business landscape. Thus, the current study aims to investigate the intricate interplay between ESG performance and investment patterns (capital vs. environmental) within the corporate setting. This study sought to identify the influence of ESG scores on earnings-driven investments (capital investment) and environmental investments, exploring potential trade-offs and implications for corporate decision-making. The analysis was conducted by sampling nonfinancial sector enterprises from BRICS nations from 2010 to 2022. For regression analysis, system generalized method of moments (GMM) was employed to address endogeneity concerns. The findings revealed a significant positive correlation between ESG performance and earnings-driven investments (capital investment). However, a negative relationship emerged between ESG scores and environmental investments, signifying potential trade-offs between financial profitability and dedicated environmental spending within companies. Other variables, including firm size, debt ratios, cash holdings, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, significantly impacted investment patterns. The study’s outcomes provide valuable guidance for corporate managers navigating sustainable investment strategies. Emphasizing earnings-driven investments, particularly capital projects, with a high ESG focus could align financial objectives with sustainable practices, enhancing long-term viability and stakeholder trust. The study’s insights contribute to the broader discourse on responsible corporate practices and sustainability. The findings shed light on the complexities of balancing financial objectives with environmental responsibilities, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach reconciling financial goals with ESG commitments. This study contributes novel insights by dissecting the nuanced relationships between ESG performance and investment decisions. The analysis provides a novel perspective on companies' trade-offs between the investment mix and pursuing ESG performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000279/pdfft?md5=1707693a2e9e39603494fd6a869ddda0&pid=1-s2.0-S2214845024000279-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000279\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borsa Istanbul Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将环境、社会和治理(ESG)原则纳入投资决策已日益受到商业界的关注。因此,本研究旨在调查企业环境、社会和治理绩效与投资模式(资本投资与环境投资)之间错综复杂的相互作用。本研究旨在确定环境、社会和公司治理得分对盈利驱动型投资(资本投资)和环境投资的影响,探索潜在的权衡和对企业决策的影响。分析是通过对 2010 年至 2022 年金砖国家非金融部门企业的抽样进行的。在回归分析中,采用了系统广义矩法(GMM)来解决内生性问题。研究结果表明,环境、社会和治理绩效与盈利驱动型投资(资本投资)之间存在明显的正相关关系。然而,环境、社会和公司治理得分与环保投资之间出现了负相关关系,这表明公司内部可能会在财务盈利能力和专项环保支出之间进行权衡。其他变量,包括公司规模、负债率、现金持有量和二氧化碳排放量,也对投资模式产生了重大影响。研究结果为企业管理者制定可持续投资战略提供了宝贵的指导。强调收益驱动型投资,尤其是高度关注环境、社会和公司治理的资本项目,可以使财务目标与可持续发展实践相一致,从而增强长期生存能力和利益相关者的信任。本研究的见解有助于更广泛地讨论负责任的企业实践和可持续发展问题。研究结果揭示了平衡财务目标与环境责任的复杂性,强调了协调财务目标与环境、社会和公司治理承诺的平衡方法的必要性。本研究通过剖析环境、社会和公司治理绩效与投资决策之间的微妙关系,提出了新颖的见解。该分析为公司在投资组合与追求环境、社会和公司治理绩效之间的权衡提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance determine investment mix? New empirical evidence from BRICS

Integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles into investment decisions has garnered increased attention in the business landscape. Thus, the current study aims to investigate the intricate interplay between ESG performance and investment patterns (capital vs. environmental) within the corporate setting. This study sought to identify the influence of ESG scores on earnings-driven investments (capital investment) and environmental investments, exploring potential trade-offs and implications for corporate decision-making. The analysis was conducted by sampling nonfinancial sector enterprises from BRICS nations from 2010 to 2022. For regression analysis, system generalized method of moments (GMM) was employed to address endogeneity concerns. The findings revealed a significant positive correlation between ESG performance and earnings-driven investments (capital investment). However, a negative relationship emerged between ESG scores and environmental investments, signifying potential trade-offs between financial profitability and dedicated environmental spending within companies. Other variables, including firm size, debt ratios, cash holdings, and CO2 emissions, significantly impacted investment patterns. The study’s outcomes provide valuable guidance for corporate managers navigating sustainable investment strategies. Emphasizing earnings-driven investments, particularly capital projects, with a high ESG focus could align financial objectives with sustainable practices, enhancing long-term viability and stakeholder trust. The study’s insights contribute to the broader discourse on responsible corporate practices and sustainability. The findings shed light on the complexities of balancing financial objectives with environmental responsibilities, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach reconciling financial goals with ESG commitments. This study contributes novel insights by dissecting the nuanced relationships between ESG performance and investment decisions. The analysis provides a novel perspective on companies' trade-offs between the investment mix and pursuing ESG performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
130
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Borsa İstanbul Anonim Sirketi. Borsa İstanbul Review provides a scholarly platform for empirical financial studies including but not limited to financial markets and institutions, financial economics, investor behavior, financial centers and market structures, corporate finance, recent economic and financial trends. Micro and macro data applications and comparative studies are welcome. Country coverage includes advanced, emerging and developing economies. In particular, we would like to publish empirical papers with significant policy implications and encourage submissions in the following areas: Research Topics: • Investments and Portfolio Management • Behavioral Finance • Financial Markets and Institutions • Market Microstructure • Islamic Finance • Financial Risk Management • Valuation • Capital Markets Governance • Financial Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信