在海外地点举行仪式:对一个双边发展机构的多案例研究

IF 2.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Katsutoshi Fushimi
{"title":"在海外地点举行仪式:对一个双边发展机构的多案例研究","authors":"Katsutoshi Fushimi","doi":"10.1108/ijoa-07-2023-3822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Prior institutional duality research asserts that ceremonial implementation of organisational practice protects multinational corporations’ subsidiaries. However, the temporal dynamics of the safeguarding function has been under researched. Public sector organisations have also been ignored. This research aims to explore how the safeguarding function is created, maintained and disrupted using the overseas offices (OOs) of a bilateral development agency (BDA) as a case.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A multi-case study, underpinned by neo-institutionalism, was conducted. Data obtained from in-depth remote interviews with 39 informants from the BDA OOs were analysed using the “asking small and large questions” technique, four analytical techniques, cross-case synthesis and theoretical propositions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>A three-phase process was identified. The first phase is the appearance of discrepancies due to institutional duality. The second is the emergence of ceremonial implementation as a solution. In the third phase, “the creation, maintenance and disruption of a safeguarding function” begins. When ceremonial implementation successfully protects the OOs, the safeguarding function is created. The OOs are likely to repeat ceremonial implementation, thus sustaining the function. Meanwhile, when conditions such as management staff change, ceremonial implementation may not take place, and the safeguarding function disappears.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The BDA OOs may not face strong host country regulative pressures because they are donors to aid-recipient countries. Hence, the findings may not directly apply to other public sector organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Development cooperation practitioners should understand that ceremonial implementation is not exclusively harmful.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first institutional duality research that explores the temporal dynamics of safeguarding functions targeting public sector organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organizational Analysis","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ceremonial implementation at overseas locations: a multi-case study of a bilateral development agency\",\"authors\":\"Katsutoshi Fushimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijoa-07-2023-3822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Prior institutional duality research asserts that ceremonial implementation of organisational practice protects multinational corporations’ subsidiaries. However, the temporal dynamics of the safeguarding function has been under researched. Public sector organisations have also been ignored. This research aims to explore how the safeguarding function is created, maintained and disrupted using the overseas offices (OOs) of a bilateral development agency (BDA) as a case.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A multi-case study, underpinned by neo-institutionalism, was conducted. Data obtained from in-depth remote interviews with 39 informants from the BDA OOs were analysed using the “asking small and large questions” technique, four analytical techniques, cross-case synthesis and theoretical propositions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>A three-phase process was identified. The first phase is the appearance of discrepancies due to institutional duality. The second is the emergence of ceremonial implementation as a solution. In the third phase, “the creation, maintenance and disruption of a safeguarding function” begins. When ceremonial implementation successfully protects the OOs, the safeguarding function is created. The OOs are likely to repeat ceremonial implementation, thus sustaining the function. Meanwhile, when conditions such as management staff change, ceremonial implementation may not take place, and the safeguarding function disappears.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The BDA OOs may not face strong host country regulative pressures because they are donors to aid-recipient countries. Hence, the findings may not directly apply to other public sector organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Development cooperation practitioners should understand that ceremonial implementation is not exclusively harmful.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first institutional duality research that explores the temporal dynamics of safeguarding functions targeting public sector organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Organizational Analysis\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Organizational Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-07-2023-3822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organizational Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-07-2023-3822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 先前的机构二元性研究认为,组织惯例的礼仪实施可以保护跨国公司的子公司。然而,对保障职能的时间动态研究不足。公共部门组织也被忽视。本研究旨在以一个双边发展机构(BDA)的海外办事处(OOs)为案例,探讨保障职能是如何产生、维持和中断的。采用 "问小问题和问大问题 "技术、四种分析技术、跨案例综合和理论命题,分析了对来自双边发展机构的 39 名信息提供者进行深入远程访谈所获得的数据。第一阶段是由于制度的双重性而出现差异。第二阶段是作为解决方案的仪式执行的出现。第三阶段是 "保障功能的创建、维持和中断"。当礼仪性实施成功地保护了 OOs 时,保护功能就产生了。OO 很可能会重复仪式性实施,从而维持该功能。与此同时,当管理人员等条件发生变化时,礼仪性实施可能不会发生,保护功能也会消失。据作者所知,这是第一项探讨公共部门组织保障功能的时间动态的机构二重性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ceremonial implementation at overseas locations: a multi-case study of a bilateral development agency

Purpose

Prior institutional duality research asserts that ceremonial implementation of organisational practice protects multinational corporations’ subsidiaries. However, the temporal dynamics of the safeguarding function has been under researched. Public sector organisations have also been ignored. This research aims to explore how the safeguarding function is created, maintained and disrupted using the overseas offices (OOs) of a bilateral development agency (BDA) as a case.

Design/methodology/approach

A multi-case study, underpinned by neo-institutionalism, was conducted. Data obtained from in-depth remote interviews with 39 informants from the BDA OOs were analysed using the “asking small and large questions” technique, four analytical techniques, cross-case synthesis and theoretical propositions.

Findings

A three-phase process was identified. The first phase is the appearance of discrepancies due to institutional duality. The second is the emergence of ceremonial implementation as a solution. In the third phase, “the creation, maintenance and disruption of a safeguarding function” begins. When ceremonial implementation successfully protects the OOs, the safeguarding function is created. The OOs are likely to repeat ceremonial implementation, thus sustaining the function. Meanwhile, when conditions such as management staff change, ceremonial implementation may not take place, and the safeguarding function disappears.

Research limitations/implications

The BDA OOs may not face strong host country regulative pressures because they are donors to aid-recipient countries. Hence, the findings may not directly apply to other public sector organisations.

Practical implications

Development cooperation practitioners should understand that ceremonial implementation is not exclusively harmful.

Originality/value

To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first institutional duality research that explores the temporal dynamics of safeguarding functions targeting public sector organisations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The IJOA welcomes papers that draw on, but not exclusively: ■Organization theory ■Organization behaviour ■Organization development ■Organizational learning ■Strategic and change management ■People in organizational contexts including human resource management and human resource development ■Business and its interrelationship with society ■Ethics and morals, spirituality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信