{"title":"三种外来入侵同系茶花(Dipsacus)物种的种群结构","authors":"John F. Gaskin, Natalie West, Brian G. Rector","doi":"10.1017/inp.2024.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three species of the Old World genus <jats:italic>Dipsacus</jats:italic> L. are considered invasive in the Americas, yet they may differ in how they spread, reproduce, and in genetic diversity. Differences in invasion method may suggest that different management techniques are needed for each species. We performed genetic analyses on 572 plants in 69 populations from the USA, Argentina, and Eurasia with the goals of analyzing taxonomy, diversity, mode of reproduction, population structure and founder effect of each of these species’ invasions, as well as looking for evidence of recent or ongoing hybridization. We found <jats:italic>D. sativus</jats:italic> to be lowest in diversity and possibly relying on self-pollination more than the other species, <jats:italic>D. fullonum</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>D. laciniatus</jats:italic>. We found no evidence of hybridization within the invasions and no support for <jats:italic>D. sativus</jats:italic> as a subspecies of <jats:italic>D. fullonum</jats:italic>. The closest genetic matches of <jats:italic>D. fullonum</jats:italic> from USA to the native range were with Hungary and Spain, while the closest match for <jats:italic>D. fullonum</jats:italic> between Argentina and the native range was with Spain. <jats:italic>Dipsacus laciniatus</jats:italic> from the USA most closely matched with samples from Russia. Population structure information regarding these three weedy <jats:italic>Dipsacus</jats:italic> species can help us understand their invasive processes as well as give insight into their management and the development of a biological control program.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population structure of three invasive congeneric teasel (Dipsacus) species\",\"authors\":\"John F. Gaskin, Natalie West, Brian G. Rector\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/inp.2024.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three species of the Old World genus <jats:italic>Dipsacus</jats:italic> L. are considered invasive in the Americas, yet they may differ in how they spread, reproduce, and in genetic diversity. Differences in invasion method may suggest that different management techniques are needed for each species. We performed genetic analyses on 572 plants in 69 populations from the USA, Argentina, and Eurasia with the goals of analyzing taxonomy, diversity, mode of reproduction, population structure and founder effect of each of these species’ invasions, as well as looking for evidence of recent or ongoing hybridization. We found <jats:italic>D. sativus</jats:italic> to be lowest in diversity and possibly relying on self-pollination more than the other species, <jats:italic>D. fullonum</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>D. laciniatus</jats:italic>. We found no evidence of hybridization within the invasions and no support for <jats:italic>D. sativus</jats:italic> as a subspecies of <jats:italic>D. fullonum</jats:italic>. The closest genetic matches of <jats:italic>D. fullonum</jats:italic> from USA to the native range were with Hungary and Spain, while the closest match for <jats:italic>D. fullonum</jats:italic> between Argentina and the native range was with Spain. <jats:italic>Dipsacus laciniatus</jats:italic> from the USA most closely matched with samples from Russia. Population structure information regarding these three weedy <jats:italic>Dipsacus</jats:italic> species can help us understand their invasive processes as well as give insight into their management and the development of a biological control program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2024.5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2024.5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
旧大陆 Dipsacus L.属的三个物种被认为是美洲的入侵物种,但它们在传播、繁殖和遗传多样性方面可能有所不同。入侵方式的不同可能表明每个物种需要不同的管理技术。我们对来自美国、阿根廷和欧亚大陆的 69 个种群中的 572 株植物进行了遗传分析,目的是分析这些物种入侵的分类、多样性、繁殖方式、种群结构和始祖效应,并寻找最近或正在进行的杂交的证据。我们发现 D. sativus 的多样性最低,可能比其他物种 D. fullonum 和 D. laciniatus 更依赖自花授粉。我们没有发现入侵物种内部杂交的证据,也不支持 D. sativus 作为 D. fullonum 的一个亚种。从美国到原产地的 D. fullonum 与匈牙利和西班牙的基因匹配最接近,而从阿根廷到原产地的 D. fullonum 与西班牙的基因匹配最接近。美国的 Dipsacus laciniatus 与俄罗斯的样本匹配度最高。有关这三种杂草 Dipsacus 的种群结构信息可以帮助我们了解它们的入侵过程,并为它们的管理和生物防治计划的制定提供启示。
Population structure of three invasive congeneric teasel (Dipsacus) species
Three species of the Old World genus Dipsacus L. are considered invasive in the Americas, yet they may differ in how they spread, reproduce, and in genetic diversity. Differences in invasion method may suggest that different management techniques are needed for each species. We performed genetic analyses on 572 plants in 69 populations from the USA, Argentina, and Eurasia with the goals of analyzing taxonomy, diversity, mode of reproduction, population structure and founder effect of each of these species’ invasions, as well as looking for evidence of recent or ongoing hybridization. We found D. sativus to be lowest in diversity and possibly relying on self-pollination more than the other species, D. fullonum and D. laciniatus. We found no evidence of hybridization within the invasions and no support for D. sativus as a subspecies of D. fullonum. The closest genetic matches of D. fullonum from USA to the native range were with Hungary and Spain, while the closest match for D. fullonum between Argentina and the native range was with Spain. Dipsacus laciniatus from the USA most closely matched with samples from Russia. Population structure information regarding these three weedy Dipsacus species can help us understand their invasive processes as well as give insight into their management and the development of a biological control program.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.