折扣差异对购买意向的影响:理由的调节作用

IF 3.1 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Melby Karina Zuniga Huertas, Thais Rubia Ferreira Lepre, André Torres Urdan
{"title":"折扣差异对购买意向的影响:理由的调节作用","authors":"Melby Karina Zuniga Huertas, Thais Rubia Ferreira Lepre, André Torres Urdan","doi":"10.1108/mrr-12-2022-0877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to clarify the effect of discount discrepancy (DD) on consumers’ purchase intention (PI). The authors propose, test and provide evidence and explanations about the moderation of justification in the relation between consumers’ perceived DD and PI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors conducted three experimental studies with a 2 × 2 factorial design, focusing on consumers’ processing of price discounts. Participants were informed that this study aimed to gather opinions on fashion, clothing and retail sales promotions. They accessed the questionnaire via Qualtrics. Each participant took part in only one study. The experimental conditions were manipulated through scenarios.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Study 1 tested and supported the moderation of justification on the effect of DD on PI. Study 2 tested and supported the moderation of the type of justification for the effect of DD on PI. Study 3 confirmed the findings in Study 2 and revealed the more effective type of justification.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The authors focused on a typically hedonic product category (fashion clothing). Further research should include a wider variety of goods and services, which could lead to different explanations or generalizations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Sales promotions must refrain from generating DD between the initial price discount and the subsequent smaller discounts. Practitioners must evaluate the gains of an initial, more considerable percentage discount to attract consumers to the store and sell them other products versus the cost of losing sales because of DD. Management should recognize the importance of giving the correct justification for perceived DD, aligning the firm’s justification with the consumer’s motivation to buy the product.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The authors offer subsidies for effective consumer protection policies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>By studying the influence of justification on the effect of DD on PI, the authors propose a mechanism that would reduce the negative effect of DD on consumers’ PI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47769,"journal":{"name":"Management Research Review","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of discount discrepancy on purchase intention: the moderation of justification\",\"authors\":\"Melby Karina Zuniga Huertas, Thais Rubia Ferreira Lepre, André Torres Urdan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mrr-12-2022-0877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to clarify the effect of discount discrepancy (DD) on consumers’ purchase intention (PI). The authors propose, test and provide evidence and explanations about the moderation of justification in the relation between consumers’ perceived DD and PI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The authors conducted three experimental studies with a 2 × 2 factorial design, focusing on consumers’ processing of price discounts. Participants were informed that this study aimed to gather opinions on fashion, clothing and retail sales promotions. They accessed the questionnaire via Qualtrics. Each participant took part in only one study. The experimental conditions were manipulated through scenarios.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Study 1 tested and supported the moderation of justification on the effect of DD on PI. Study 2 tested and supported the moderation of the type of justification for the effect of DD on PI. Study 3 confirmed the findings in Study 2 and revealed the more effective type of justification.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The authors focused on a typically hedonic product category (fashion clothing). Further research should include a wider variety of goods and services, which could lead to different explanations or generalizations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Sales promotions must refrain from generating DD between the initial price discount and the subsequent smaller discounts. Practitioners must evaluate the gains of an initial, more considerable percentage discount to attract consumers to the store and sell them other products versus the cost of losing sales because of DD. Management should recognize the importance of giving the correct justification for perceived DD, aligning the firm’s justification with the consumer’s motivation to buy the product.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>The authors offer subsidies for effective consumer protection policies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>By studying the influence of justification on the effect of DD on PI, the authors propose a mechanism that would reduce the negative effect of DD on consumers’ PI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Research Review\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-12-2022-0877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-12-2022-0877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本文旨在阐明折扣差异(DD)对消费者购买意向(PI)的影响。作者提出了消费者感知到的折扣差异与购买意向之间的关系,并检验和解释了消费者感知到的折扣差异与购买意向之间的关系中合理性的调节作用。参与者被告知本研究旨在收集关于时尚、服装和零售促销的意见。他们通过 Qualtrics 访问问卷。每位参与者只参加一项研究。研究结果 研究 1 检验并支持了合理性对 DD 对 PI 影响的调节作用。研究 2 检验并证实了理由类型对 DD 对 PI 影响的调节作用。研究 3 证实了研究 2 的结果,并揭示了更有效的理由类型。研究局限性/启示作者重点研究了典型的享乐主义产品类别(时尚服装)。实际意义促销活动必须避免在最初的价格折扣和随后的较小折扣之间产生 DD。实践者必须评估初始的、更大比例的折扣所带来的收益,即吸引消费者到店并向他们销售其他产品的收益与因 DD 而损失销售额的成本。管理者应认识到为感知到的价格折扣提供正确理由的重要性,使公司的理由与消费者购买产品的动机相一致。原创性/价值通过研究理由对价格折扣对消费者信心指数影响的影响,作者提出了一种机制,可以减少价格折扣对消费者信心指数的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of discount discrepancy on purchase intention: the moderation of justification

Purpose

This paper aims to clarify the effect of discount discrepancy (DD) on consumers’ purchase intention (PI). The authors propose, test and provide evidence and explanations about the moderation of justification in the relation between consumers’ perceived DD and PI.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conducted three experimental studies with a 2 × 2 factorial design, focusing on consumers’ processing of price discounts. Participants were informed that this study aimed to gather opinions on fashion, clothing and retail sales promotions. They accessed the questionnaire via Qualtrics. Each participant took part in only one study. The experimental conditions were manipulated through scenarios.

Findings

Study 1 tested and supported the moderation of justification on the effect of DD on PI. Study 2 tested and supported the moderation of the type of justification for the effect of DD on PI. Study 3 confirmed the findings in Study 2 and revealed the more effective type of justification.

Research limitations/implications

The authors focused on a typically hedonic product category (fashion clothing). Further research should include a wider variety of goods and services, which could lead to different explanations or generalizations.

Practical implications

Sales promotions must refrain from generating DD between the initial price discount and the subsequent smaller discounts. Practitioners must evaluate the gains of an initial, more considerable percentage discount to attract consumers to the store and sell them other products versus the cost of losing sales because of DD. Management should recognize the importance of giving the correct justification for perceived DD, aligning the firm’s justification with the consumer’s motivation to buy the product.

Social implications

The authors offer subsidies for effective consumer protection policies.

Originality/value

By studying the influence of justification on the effect of DD on PI, the authors propose a mechanism that would reduce the negative effect of DD on consumers’ PI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Management Research Review publishes a wide variety of articles outlining the latest management research. We emphasize management implication from multiple disciplines. We welcome high quality empirical and theoretical studies, literature reviews, and articles with important tactical implications. Published 12 times a year, the journal prides itself on quick publication of the very latest research in general management. The key issues featured include: Business Ethics and Sustainability Corporate Finance Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management Industrial Relations Information and Knowledge Management International Business Human Resource Management Organizational Theory and Behaviour Production and Operations Management Strategic Management and Leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信