{"title":"霍米-J-巴巴:一生》,作者 Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy(评论)","authors":"Souvik Kar","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a920557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Homi J. Bhabha: A Life</em> by Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Souvik Kar (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Homi J. Bhabha: A Life</em> By Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy. New Delhi: Rupa Publications, 2023. Pp. 723. <p>This biography of Indian nuclear physicist Homi Jehangir Bhabha (1909–66), the first chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission of India, places Bhabha at the center of an era straddling early twentieth-century Indo-European scientific exchange, the atomic age, Indian independence from British colonial rule, and the development of the Indian nuclear program.</p> <p>Dadabhoy divides his biography into three sections, each detailing a phase of Bhabha's life: \"Scientist as Researcher,\" \"Scientist as Institution-Builder,\" and \"Scientist as Administrator.\" A final section, \"Coda,\" describes Bhabha's untimely and controversial death. Dadabhoy sketches a life of high drama: Bhabha's apprenticeship with European luminaries of physics in the 1930s, his decision to return to freshly independent India to build nuclear establishments from scratch—despite acute resource scarcity—and steer Indian nuclear policy amid Cold War pressures, and finally, his mysterious death in a plane crash near Mont Blanc in 1966. Bhabha's story, as a major Indian <strong>[End Page 410]</strong> nuclear historian has described, possesses the ingredients for a \"modern fairy tale\" for India (Itty Abraham, <em>The Making of the Indian Nuclear Bomb</em>, 1998).</p> <p>Modern historiography of the Indian nuclear program demystifies such a fairy tale, especially calling attention to Bhabha's problematic fostering of a culture of authoritarian secrecy around the civil nuclear complex (Abraham, 1998; George Perkovich, <em>India's Nuclear Bomb</em>, 1999; Janhavi Phalkey, <em>Atomic State</em>, 2013). On the other hand, a long hagiographic tradition represents Bhabha as a postcolonial hero, harnessing science to rejuvenate a people colonially stereotyped as technological laggards and rebuild a nation left impoverished by centuries of colonial plunder (Ganeshan Venkataraman, <em>Magnificent Obsessions</em>, 1994; Chintamani Deshmukh, <em>Homi Jehangir Bhabha</em>, 2010; Biman Nath, <em>Renaissance Man</em>, 2022).</p> <p>Taking a middle path between the above traditions, Dadabhoy's biography commits to painting a complex portrait of a man emerging from Parsi society (Indian Zoroastrians, a wealthy, heavily Westernized minority community) and grappling with historical forces with some lasting achievements and some equally lasting problematic legacies. This translates into following a structure of oscillation between opposites in representing Bhabha's life and decisions: for example, Dadabhoy remarks on the theme of <em>individualism</em> animating Bhabha's policy of institution building—where talented individuals were first identified, and institutions were then built around them. Then, Dadabhoy follows up with a description of Bhabha's fostering of a strong <em>collective</em> identity for Indian scientists who identified with Indian nationalism but did not neglect international ties. Such a structure helps to reconcile what appears to be historical contradictions: the overambitious idealism of Bhabha's \"three-stage plan\" for Indian nuclear power generation—which envisioned nuclear reactors <em>producing</em> more uranium than they consume—becomes, in Dadabhoy's analysis, a pragmatic response to the desperation of an impoverished India lacking uranium reserves and easily being outbid in the international uranium trade during Bhabha's lifetime.</p> <p>Unlike the existing nuclear historiography, Dadabhoy's biography is also intensely personal in nature, demonstrating how Bhabha, as a scientist-statesman, both at home and abroad, tapped into a dense patchwork of friendships, culminating in his triumphant presidential speech at the first Atoms for Peace Conference (1955). Dadabhoy analyzes the speech as preemptively revealing the secret research on nuclear fusion on both sides of the Cold War and encouraging international transparency and cooperation (thus contributing to the formation of the International Atomic Energy Agency).</p> <p>Simultaneously, Dadabhoy uses the biography to layer Bhabha's more problematic decisions. For example, he triangulates Bhabha's hypercompetitive egotism, his close friendship with Jawaharlal Nehru (the first prime minister of India), and his authoritarian use of secrecy to insulate himself from democratic accountability. Dadabhoy observes that this served to smother scientific and political critique of the nuclear program and concentrate <strong>[End Page 411]</strong> nuclear policymaking between only a handful of scientists and the prime minister, setting in motion the transformation of the Indian nuclear complex from a <em>scientific institution</em> into a <em>power bloc</em>: \"Bhabha became the <em>state</em> with respect to nuclear energy\" (p. 4; my emphasis). Dadabhoy updates the existing critique of Bhabha by...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homi J. Bhabha: A Life by Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy (review)\",\"authors\":\"Souvik Kar\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a920557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Homi J. Bhabha: A Life</em> by Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Souvik Kar (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Homi J. Bhabha: A Life</em> By Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy. New Delhi: Rupa Publications, 2023. Pp. 723. <p>This biography of Indian nuclear physicist Homi Jehangir Bhabha (1909–66), the first chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission of India, places Bhabha at the center of an era straddling early twentieth-century Indo-European scientific exchange, the atomic age, Indian independence from British colonial rule, and the development of the Indian nuclear program.</p> <p>Dadabhoy divides his biography into three sections, each detailing a phase of Bhabha's life: \\\"Scientist as Researcher,\\\" \\\"Scientist as Institution-Builder,\\\" and \\\"Scientist as Administrator.\\\" A final section, \\\"Coda,\\\" describes Bhabha's untimely and controversial death. Dadabhoy sketches a life of high drama: Bhabha's apprenticeship with European luminaries of physics in the 1930s, his decision to return to freshly independent India to build nuclear establishments from scratch—despite acute resource scarcity—and steer Indian nuclear policy amid Cold War pressures, and finally, his mysterious death in a plane crash near Mont Blanc in 1966. Bhabha's story, as a major Indian <strong>[End Page 410]</strong> nuclear historian has described, possesses the ingredients for a \\\"modern fairy tale\\\" for India (Itty Abraham, <em>The Making of the Indian Nuclear Bomb</em>, 1998).</p> <p>Modern historiography of the Indian nuclear program demystifies such a fairy tale, especially calling attention to Bhabha's problematic fostering of a culture of authoritarian secrecy around the civil nuclear complex (Abraham, 1998; George Perkovich, <em>India's Nuclear Bomb</em>, 1999; Janhavi Phalkey, <em>Atomic State</em>, 2013). On the other hand, a long hagiographic tradition represents Bhabha as a postcolonial hero, harnessing science to rejuvenate a people colonially stereotyped as technological laggards and rebuild a nation left impoverished by centuries of colonial plunder (Ganeshan Venkataraman, <em>Magnificent Obsessions</em>, 1994; Chintamani Deshmukh, <em>Homi Jehangir Bhabha</em>, 2010; Biman Nath, <em>Renaissance Man</em>, 2022).</p> <p>Taking a middle path between the above traditions, Dadabhoy's biography commits to painting a complex portrait of a man emerging from Parsi society (Indian Zoroastrians, a wealthy, heavily Westernized minority community) and grappling with historical forces with some lasting achievements and some equally lasting problematic legacies. This translates into following a structure of oscillation between opposites in representing Bhabha's life and decisions: for example, Dadabhoy remarks on the theme of <em>individualism</em> animating Bhabha's policy of institution building—where talented individuals were first identified, and institutions were then built around them. Then, Dadabhoy follows up with a description of Bhabha's fostering of a strong <em>collective</em> identity for Indian scientists who identified with Indian nationalism but did not neglect international ties. Such a structure helps to reconcile what appears to be historical contradictions: the overambitious idealism of Bhabha's \\\"three-stage plan\\\" for Indian nuclear power generation—which envisioned nuclear reactors <em>producing</em> more uranium than they consume—becomes, in Dadabhoy's analysis, a pragmatic response to the desperation of an impoverished India lacking uranium reserves and easily being outbid in the international uranium trade during Bhabha's lifetime.</p> <p>Unlike the existing nuclear historiography, Dadabhoy's biography is also intensely personal in nature, demonstrating how Bhabha, as a scientist-statesman, both at home and abroad, tapped into a dense patchwork of friendships, culminating in his triumphant presidential speech at the first Atoms for Peace Conference (1955). Dadabhoy analyzes the speech as preemptively revealing the secret research on nuclear fusion on both sides of the Cold War and encouraging international transparency and cooperation (thus contributing to the formation of the International Atomic Energy Agency).</p> <p>Simultaneously, Dadabhoy uses the biography to layer Bhabha's more problematic decisions. For example, he triangulates Bhabha's hypercompetitive egotism, his close friendship with Jawaharlal Nehru (the first prime minister of India), and his authoritarian use of secrecy to insulate himself from democratic accountability. Dadabhoy observes that this served to smother scientific and political critique of the nuclear program and concentrate <strong>[End Page 411]</strong> nuclear policymaking between only a handful of scientists and the prime minister, setting in motion the transformation of the Indian nuclear complex from a <em>scientific institution</em> into a <em>power bloc</em>: \\\"Bhabha became the <em>state</em> with respect to nuclear energy\\\" (p. 4; my emphasis). Dadabhoy updates the existing critique of Bhabha by...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a920557\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a920557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
评论者 Homi J. Bhabha: A Life by Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy Souvik Kar (bio) Homi J. Bhabha: A Life By Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy.新德里:Rupa 出版社,2023 年。Pp.723.这本关于印度核物理学家、印度原子能委员会首任主席霍米-杰汉吉尔-巴巴(1909-66 年)的传记,将巴巴置于一个跨越 20 世纪早期印欧科学交流、原子时代、印度从英国殖民统治下独立以及印度核计划发展的时代中心。达达博伊将他的传记分为三个部分,每个部分详细描述了巴巴生命的一个阶段:"作为研究者的科学家"、"作为机构建设者的科学家 "和 "作为管理者的科学家"。最后一节是 "尾声",描述了巴哈早逝和备受争议的一生。达达博伊勾勒了一个充满戏剧性的人生:巴哈在 20 世纪 30 年代师从欧洲物理学大师,在资源严重匮乏的情况下决定回到刚刚独立的印度从零开始建立核设施,并在冷战压力下指导印度的核政策,最后,他于 1966 年在勃朗峰附近因飞机失事神秘死亡。正如印度一位重要的核历史学家所描述的那样,巴巴的故事具备了印度 "现代童话 "的要素(Itty Abraham,《印度核弹的制造》,1998 年)。有关印度核计划的现代史学揭开了这一童话的神秘面纱,尤其让人注意到巴哈围绕民用核设施培养独裁保密文化的问题(Abraham,1998 年;George Perkovich,《印度的核弹》,1999 年;Janhavi Phalkey,《原子国家》,2013 年)。另一方面,长期的颂扬传统将巴巴塑造成后殖民时代的英雄,他利用科学振兴了被殖民地定型为技术落后的民族,重建了因数百年殖民掠夺而变得贫穷的国家(Ganeshan Venkataraman,《华丽的迷恋》,1994 年;Chintamani Deshmukh,《霍米-杰汉吉尔-巴巴》,2010 年;Biman Nath,《文艺复兴人》,2022 年)。达达博伊的传记在上述传统之间选择了一条中间道路,致力于描绘一个从帕西社会(印度琐罗亚斯德教徒,一个富裕且西方化程度较高的少数民族社区)中走出来的人的复杂形象,以及他与历史力量抗争的过程,其中既有一些持久的成就,也有一些同样持久的问题遗产。这就意味着,在表现巴哈的生活和决定时,要遵循一种对立统一的结构:例如,达达博伊论述了巴哈机构建设政策的个人主义主题--即首先发现有才能的个人,然后围绕他们建立机构。然后,达达博伊接着描述了巴巴为印度科学家培养的强烈集体认同感,他们认同印度民族主义,但也不忽视国际联系。这样的结构有助于调和看似矛盾的历史:巴哈提出的印度核能发电 "三阶段计划"--设想核反应堆生产的铀超过其消耗的铀--是好高骛远的理想主义,而在达达布霍伊的分析中,则是对巴哈生前印度缺乏铀储备、在国际铀贸易中很容易被对手击败的绝望的务实回应。与现有的核史学著作不同,达达博伊的传记还具有强烈的个人色彩,展示了作为科学家和政治家的巴哈如何在国内外发掘出密密麻麻的友谊,并最终在第一届原子和平大会(1955 年)上发表了胜利的主席演讲。达达布霍伊分析说,这次演讲先声夺人地揭露了冷战双方在核聚变方面的秘密研究,鼓励了国际透明度与合作(从而促成了国际原子能机构的成立)。与此同时,Dadabhoy 利用传记层层剖析了巴巴更有问题的决定。例如,他将巴哈的超竞争利己主义、他与贾瓦哈拉尔-尼赫鲁(印度首任总理)的亲密友谊以及他独裁地使用保密手段使自己免受民主问责的影响进行了三角剖析。Dadabhoy 指出,这扼杀了对核计划的科学和政治批判,使核决策集中在少数科学家和总理之间,启动了印度核综合体从科学机构向权力集团的转变:"在核能方面,Bhabha 成为了国家"(第 4 页;我强调了这一点)。达达博伊更新了现有的对巴巴的批判,...
Homi J. Bhabha: A Life by Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy (review)
Reviewed by:
Homi J. Bhabha: A Life by Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy
Souvik Kar (bio)
Homi J. Bhabha: A Life By Bakhtiar K. Dadabhoy. New Delhi: Rupa Publications, 2023. Pp. 723.
This biography of Indian nuclear physicist Homi Jehangir Bhabha (1909–66), the first chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission of India, places Bhabha at the center of an era straddling early twentieth-century Indo-European scientific exchange, the atomic age, Indian independence from British colonial rule, and the development of the Indian nuclear program.
Dadabhoy divides his biography into three sections, each detailing a phase of Bhabha's life: "Scientist as Researcher," "Scientist as Institution-Builder," and "Scientist as Administrator." A final section, "Coda," describes Bhabha's untimely and controversial death. Dadabhoy sketches a life of high drama: Bhabha's apprenticeship with European luminaries of physics in the 1930s, his decision to return to freshly independent India to build nuclear establishments from scratch—despite acute resource scarcity—and steer Indian nuclear policy amid Cold War pressures, and finally, his mysterious death in a plane crash near Mont Blanc in 1966. Bhabha's story, as a major Indian [End Page 410] nuclear historian has described, possesses the ingredients for a "modern fairy tale" for India (Itty Abraham, The Making of the Indian Nuclear Bomb, 1998).
Modern historiography of the Indian nuclear program demystifies such a fairy tale, especially calling attention to Bhabha's problematic fostering of a culture of authoritarian secrecy around the civil nuclear complex (Abraham, 1998; George Perkovich, India's Nuclear Bomb, 1999; Janhavi Phalkey, Atomic State, 2013). On the other hand, a long hagiographic tradition represents Bhabha as a postcolonial hero, harnessing science to rejuvenate a people colonially stereotyped as technological laggards and rebuild a nation left impoverished by centuries of colonial plunder (Ganeshan Venkataraman, Magnificent Obsessions, 1994; Chintamani Deshmukh, Homi Jehangir Bhabha, 2010; Biman Nath, Renaissance Man, 2022).
Taking a middle path between the above traditions, Dadabhoy's biography commits to painting a complex portrait of a man emerging from Parsi society (Indian Zoroastrians, a wealthy, heavily Westernized minority community) and grappling with historical forces with some lasting achievements and some equally lasting problematic legacies. This translates into following a structure of oscillation between opposites in representing Bhabha's life and decisions: for example, Dadabhoy remarks on the theme of individualism animating Bhabha's policy of institution building—where talented individuals were first identified, and institutions were then built around them. Then, Dadabhoy follows up with a description of Bhabha's fostering of a strong collective identity for Indian scientists who identified with Indian nationalism but did not neglect international ties. Such a structure helps to reconcile what appears to be historical contradictions: the overambitious idealism of Bhabha's "three-stage plan" for Indian nuclear power generation—which envisioned nuclear reactors producing more uranium than they consume—becomes, in Dadabhoy's analysis, a pragmatic response to the desperation of an impoverished India lacking uranium reserves and easily being outbid in the international uranium trade during Bhabha's lifetime.
Unlike the existing nuclear historiography, Dadabhoy's biography is also intensely personal in nature, demonstrating how Bhabha, as a scientist-statesman, both at home and abroad, tapped into a dense patchwork of friendships, culminating in his triumphant presidential speech at the first Atoms for Peace Conference (1955). Dadabhoy analyzes the speech as preemptively revealing the secret research on nuclear fusion on both sides of the Cold War and encouraging international transparency and cooperation (thus contributing to the formation of the International Atomic Energy Agency).
Simultaneously, Dadabhoy uses the biography to layer Bhabha's more problematic decisions. For example, he triangulates Bhabha's hypercompetitive egotism, his close friendship with Jawaharlal Nehru (the first prime minister of India), and his authoritarian use of secrecy to insulate himself from democratic accountability. Dadabhoy observes that this served to smother scientific and political critique of the nuclear program and concentrate [End Page 411] nuclear policymaking between only a handful of scientists and the prime minister, setting in motion the transformation of the Indian nuclear complex from a scientific institution into a power bloc: "Bhabha became the state with respect to nuclear energy" (p. 4; my emphasis). Dadabhoy updates the existing critique of Bhabha by...
期刊介绍:
Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).