闭着眼睛开车":评估空间种群评估的国际盲目模拟实验结果

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Daniel R. Goethel, Aaron M. Berger, Simon D. Hoyle, Patrick D. Lynch, Caren Barceló, Jonathan Deroba, Nicholas D. Ducharme-Barth, Alistair Dunn, Dan Fu, Francisco Izquierdo, Craig Marsh, Haikun Xu, Giancarlo M. Correa, Brian J. Langseth, Mark N. Maunder, Jeremy McKenzie, Richard D. Methot, Matthew T. Vincent, Teresa A'mar, Massimiliano Cardinale, Marta Cousido-Rocha, Nick Davies, John Hampton, Carolina Minte-Vera, Agurtzane Urtizberea
{"title":"闭着眼睛开车\":评估空间种群评估的国际盲目模拟实验结果","authors":"Daniel R. Goethel,&nbsp;Aaron M. Berger,&nbsp;Simon D. Hoyle,&nbsp;Patrick D. Lynch,&nbsp;Caren Barceló,&nbsp;Jonathan Deroba,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Ducharme-Barth,&nbsp;Alistair Dunn,&nbsp;Dan Fu,&nbsp;Francisco Izquierdo,&nbsp;Craig Marsh,&nbsp;Haikun Xu,&nbsp;Giancarlo M. Correa,&nbsp;Brian J. Langseth,&nbsp;Mark N. Maunder,&nbsp;Jeremy McKenzie,&nbsp;Richard D. Methot,&nbsp;Matthew T. Vincent,&nbsp;Teresa A'mar,&nbsp;Massimiliano Cardinale,&nbsp;Marta Cousido-Rocha,&nbsp;Nick Davies,&nbsp;John Hampton,&nbsp;Carolina Minte-Vera,&nbsp;Agurtzane Urtizberea","doi":"10.1111/faf.12819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spatial models enable understanding potential redistribution of marine resources associated with ecosystem drivers and climate change. Stock assessment platforms can incorporate spatial processes, but have not been widely implemented or simulation tested. To address this research gap, an international simulation experiment was organized. The study design was blinded to replicate uncertainty similar to a real-world stock assessment process, and a data-conditioned, high-resolution operating model (OM) was used to emulate the spatial dynamics and data for Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna (<i>Thunnus albacares</i>). Six analyst groups developed both single-region and spatial stock assessment models using an assessment platform of their choice, and then applied each model to the simulated data. Results indicated that across all spatial structures and platforms, assessments were able to adequately recreate the population trends from the OM. Additionally, spatial models were able to estimate regional population trends that generally reflected the true dynamics from the OM, particularly for the regions with higher biomass and fishing pressure. However, a consistent population biomass scaling pattern emerged, where spatial models estimated higher population scale than single-region models within a given assessment platform. Balancing parsimony and complexity trade-offs were difficult, but adequate complexity in spatial parametrizations (e.g., allowing time- and age-variation in movement and appropriate tag mixing periods) was critical to model performance. We recommend expanded use of high-resolution OMs and blinded studies, given their ability to portray realistic performance of assessment models. Moreover, increased support for international simulation experiments is warranted to facilitate dissemination of methodology across organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"25 3","pages":"471-490"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12819","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Drivin' with your eyes closed’: Results from an international, blinded simulation experiment to evaluate spatial stock assessments\",\"authors\":\"Daniel R. Goethel,&nbsp;Aaron M. Berger,&nbsp;Simon D. Hoyle,&nbsp;Patrick D. Lynch,&nbsp;Caren Barceló,&nbsp;Jonathan Deroba,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Ducharme-Barth,&nbsp;Alistair Dunn,&nbsp;Dan Fu,&nbsp;Francisco Izquierdo,&nbsp;Craig Marsh,&nbsp;Haikun Xu,&nbsp;Giancarlo M. Correa,&nbsp;Brian J. Langseth,&nbsp;Mark N. Maunder,&nbsp;Jeremy McKenzie,&nbsp;Richard D. Methot,&nbsp;Matthew T. Vincent,&nbsp;Teresa A'mar,&nbsp;Massimiliano Cardinale,&nbsp;Marta Cousido-Rocha,&nbsp;Nick Davies,&nbsp;John Hampton,&nbsp;Carolina Minte-Vera,&nbsp;Agurtzane Urtizberea\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.12819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Spatial models enable understanding potential redistribution of marine resources associated with ecosystem drivers and climate change. Stock assessment platforms can incorporate spatial processes, but have not been widely implemented or simulation tested. To address this research gap, an international simulation experiment was organized. The study design was blinded to replicate uncertainty similar to a real-world stock assessment process, and a data-conditioned, high-resolution operating model (OM) was used to emulate the spatial dynamics and data for Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna (<i>Thunnus albacares</i>). Six analyst groups developed both single-region and spatial stock assessment models using an assessment platform of their choice, and then applied each model to the simulated data. Results indicated that across all spatial structures and platforms, assessments were able to adequately recreate the population trends from the OM. Additionally, spatial models were able to estimate regional population trends that generally reflected the true dynamics from the OM, particularly for the regions with higher biomass and fishing pressure. However, a consistent population biomass scaling pattern emerged, where spatial models estimated higher population scale than single-region models within a given assessment platform. Balancing parsimony and complexity trade-offs were difficult, but adequate complexity in spatial parametrizations (e.g., allowing time- and age-variation in movement and appropriate tag mixing periods) was critical to model performance. We recommend expanded use of high-resolution OMs and blinded studies, given their ability to portray realistic performance of assessment models. Moreover, increased support for international simulation experiments is warranted to facilitate dissemination of methodology across organizations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"471-490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12819\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12819\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12819","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过空间模型,可以了解与生态系统驱动因素和气候变化相关的海洋资源的潜在重新分布。种群评估平台可纳入空间过程,但尚未广泛实施或进行模拟测试。为弥补这一研究空白,组织了一次国际模拟实验。研究设计采用盲法,以复制与真实世界种群评估过程类似的不确定性,并使用数据条件化的高分辨率操作模型(OM)来模拟印度洋黄鳍金枪鱼(Thunnus albacares)的空间动态和数据。六个分析小组利用各自选择的评估平台开发了单区域和空间种群评估模型,然后将每个模型应用于模拟数据。结果表明,在所有空间结构和平台上,评估都能充分再现海洋管理中的种群趋势。此外,空间模型能够估算出区域种群趋势,总体上反映了海洋观测数据的真实动态,尤其是在生物量和捕捞压力较大的区域。然而,出现了一种一致的种群生物量比例模式,即在特定评估平台内,空间模式估算的种群比例高于单一区域模式。在简约性和复杂性之间进行权衡是困难的,但空间参数的充分复杂性(例如,允许运动的时间和年龄变化以及适当的标记混合期)对模型的性能至关重要。我们建议扩大使用高分辨率 OMs 和盲法研究,因为它们能够反映评估模型的真实性能。此外,有必要增加对国际模拟实验的支持,以促进方法在各组织间的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

‘Drivin' with your eyes closed’: Results from an international, blinded simulation experiment to evaluate spatial stock assessments

‘Drivin' with your eyes closed’: Results from an international, blinded simulation experiment to evaluate spatial stock assessments

Spatial models enable understanding potential redistribution of marine resources associated with ecosystem drivers and climate change. Stock assessment platforms can incorporate spatial processes, but have not been widely implemented or simulation tested. To address this research gap, an international simulation experiment was organized. The study design was blinded to replicate uncertainty similar to a real-world stock assessment process, and a data-conditioned, high-resolution operating model (OM) was used to emulate the spatial dynamics and data for Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares). Six analyst groups developed both single-region and spatial stock assessment models using an assessment platform of their choice, and then applied each model to the simulated data. Results indicated that across all spatial structures and platforms, assessments were able to adequately recreate the population trends from the OM. Additionally, spatial models were able to estimate regional population trends that generally reflected the true dynamics from the OM, particularly for the regions with higher biomass and fishing pressure. However, a consistent population biomass scaling pattern emerged, where spatial models estimated higher population scale than single-region models within a given assessment platform. Balancing parsimony and complexity trade-offs were difficult, but adequate complexity in spatial parametrizations (e.g., allowing time- and age-variation in movement and appropriate tag mixing periods) was critical to model performance. We recommend expanded use of high-resolution OMs and blinded studies, given their ability to portray realistic performance of assessment models. Moreover, increased support for international simulation experiments is warranted to facilitate dissemination of methodology across organizations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信