David Werner , Lauren Casey , Ethan Myers , Joaquin A. Barrios
{"title":"慢性踝关节不稳的下肢深蹲生物力学和选定临床测量方法","authors":"David Werner , Lauren Casey , Ethan Myers , Joaquin A. Barrios","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability often present with clinical and biomechanical abnormalities, however squat biomechanics have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare select clinical assessments and squat biomechanics between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifteen individuals with chronic ankle instability and a matched control group were studied. A weight-bearing dorsiflexion lunge test, foot posture, and an in-line half-kneeling motor control test for core stability were assessed. Lower limb 3D bilateral and unilateral squat biomechanics were captured. Groups, limbs and squat tasks were compared using an alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability had less static weight-bearing dorsiflexion and failed the core stability test more frequently, but did not differ in foot morphology compared to the controls. When squatting, those with chronic ankle instability demonstrated reduced peak ankle dorsiflexion angles and moments in the involved limb (<em>p</em> < 0.04) during single limb squats and had interlimb differences in ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as hip and knee kinetics (<em>p</em> < 0.04) during double limb squats. In those with chronic ankle instability, there was less overall motion, but higher kinetic demands in single limb versus double leg squatting (<em>p</em> < 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability had impaired weight-bearing dorsiflexion and showed impaired core stability more often, which accompanied altered squatting mechanics in both variations. Within the limbs with chronic ankle instability, single limb squats showed lesser kinematic demands but higher kinetic demands than double limb squatting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324000433/pdfft?md5=e7dc3443d3daff98c4328501dfb2d477&pid=1-s2.0-S0268003324000433-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower limb squat biomechanics and select clinical measures in chronic ankle instability\",\"authors\":\"David Werner , Lauren Casey , Ethan Myers , Joaquin A. Barrios\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability often present with clinical and biomechanical abnormalities, however squat biomechanics have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare select clinical assessments and squat biomechanics between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifteen individuals with chronic ankle instability and a matched control group were studied. A weight-bearing dorsiflexion lunge test, foot posture, and an in-line half-kneeling motor control test for core stability were assessed. Lower limb 3D bilateral and unilateral squat biomechanics were captured. Groups, limbs and squat tasks were compared using an alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability had less static weight-bearing dorsiflexion and failed the core stability test more frequently, but did not differ in foot morphology compared to the controls. When squatting, those with chronic ankle instability demonstrated reduced peak ankle dorsiflexion angles and moments in the involved limb (<em>p</em> < 0.04) during single limb squats and had interlimb differences in ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as hip and knee kinetics (<em>p</em> < 0.04) during double limb squats. In those with chronic ankle instability, there was less overall motion, but higher kinetic demands in single limb versus double leg squatting (<em>p</em> < 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability had impaired weight-bearing dorsiflexion and showed impaired core stability more often, which accompanied altered squatting mechanics in both variations. Within the limbs with chronic ankle instability, single limb squats showed lesser kinematic demands but higher kinetic demands than double limb squatting.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324000433/pdfft?md5=e7dc3443d3daff98c4328501dfb2d477&pid=1-s2.0-S0268003324000433-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324000433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324000433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lower limb squat biomechanics and select clinical measures in chronic ankle instability
Background
Individuals with chronic ankle instability often present with clinical and biomechanical abnormalities, however squat biomechanics have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare select clinical assessments and squat biomechanics between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.
Methods
Fifteen individuals with chronic ankle instability and a matched control group were studied. A weight-bearing dorsiflexion lunge test, foot posture, and an in-line half-kneeling motor control test for core stability were assessed. Lower limb 3D bilateral and unilateral squat biomechanics were captured. Groups, limbs and squat tasks were compared using an alpha of 0.05.
Findings
Individuals with chronic ankle instability had less static weight-bearing dorsiflexion and failed the core stability test more frequently, but did not differ in foot morphology compared to the controls. When squatting, those with chronic ankle instability demonstrated reduced peak ankle dorsiflexion angles and moments in the involved limb (p < 0.04) during single limb squats and had interlimb differences in ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as hip and knee kinetics (p < 0.04) during double limb squats. In those with chronic ankle instability, there was less overall motion, but higher kinetic demands in single limb versus double leg squatting (p < 0.03).
Interpretation
Individuals with chronic ankle instability had impaired weight-bearing dorsiflexion and showed impaired core stability more often, which accompanied altered squatting mechanics in both variations. Within the limbs with chronic ankle instability, single limb squats showed lesser kinematic demands but higher kinetic demands than double limb squatting.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.