利用 qPCR 估算印度马哈拉施特拉邦孕妇中土壤传播蠕虫的寄生负担:一项基于社区的研究。

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Indian Journal of Community Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI:10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_249_23
Shilpa Gaidhane, Abhay Gaidhane, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Shital Telrandhe, Manoj Patil, Deepak Saxena, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Sonali Choudhari, Quazi S Zahiruddin
{"title":"利用 qPCR 估算印度马哈拉施特拉邦孕妇中土壤传播蠕虫的寄生负担:一项基于社区的研究。","authors":"Shilpa Gaidhane, Abhay Gaidhane, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Shital Telrandhe, Manoj Patil, Deepak Saxena, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Sonali Choudhari, Quazi S Zahiruddin","doi":"10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_249_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are widespread in developing countries with inadequate sanitation facilities. These infections can lead to malnutrition, anemia, and other complications that can negatively impact both the mother's and fetus's health during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the burden of STH by Kato-Katz microscopy and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in pregnant women from rural India. The diagnostic accuracy of these two methods was also compared.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in rural areas of Wardha district of Maharashtra state. We randomly selected and interviewed 688 pregnant women. A total of 534 (77.61%) participants gave stool samples. Two containers (60 mL) labeled with a unique identification number were given to pregnant women to collect stool samples for Kato-Katz microscopy and qPCR. Stool specimens were transported to an accredited lab and examined within 24 hours. Suitable examinations were conducted to compare sensitivity between two tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results are presented for 534 participants who gave stool samples. The prevalence of any STH by Kato-Katz stool microscopy was 6.55% (95%CI 4.46-12.19), and that by qPCR was 20.41 (95%CI 17.53-29.40). The sensitivity of Kato-Katz microscopy was 29.17% compared to sensitivity of 90.83% by qPCR (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Pregnant women with STH infection have a significantly lower weight gain during pregnancy, and the majority were either mild or moderate anemic compared to those without STH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted significant differences in prevalence of STH among pregnant women by Kato-Katz microscopy and qPCR. The sensitivity of qPCR for detecting STH was higher than that of Kato-Katz microscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45040,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Community Medicine","volume":"49 1","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of the Parasitic Burden of Soil-Transmitted Helminths Among Pregnant Women in the Maharashtra State of India Using qPCR: A Community-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shilpa Gaidhane, Abhay Gaidhane, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Shital Telrandhe, Manoj Patil, Deepak Saxena, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Sonali Choudhari, Quazi S Zahiruddin\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_249_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are widespread in developing countries with inadequate sanitation facilities. These infections can lead to malnutrition, anemia, and other complications that can negatively impact both the mother's and fetus's health during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the burden of STH by Kato-Katz microscopy and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in pregnant women from rural India. The diagnostic accuracy of these two methods was also compared.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in rural areas of Wardha district of Maharashtra state. We randomly selected and interviewed 688 pregnant women. A total of 534 (77.61%) participants gave stool samples. Two containers (60 mL) labeled with a unique identification number were given to pregnant women to collect stool samples for Kato-Katz microscopy and qPCR. Stool specimens were transported to an accredited lab and examined within 24 hours. Suitable examinations were conducted to compare sensitivity between two tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results are presented for 534 participants who gave stool samples. The prevalence of any STH by Kato-Katz stool microscopy was 6.55% (95%CI 4.46-12.19), and that by qPCR was 20.41 (95%CI 17.53-29.40). The sensitivity of Kato-Katz microscopy was 29.17% compared to sensitivity of 90.83% by qPCR (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Pregnant women with STH infection have a significantly lower weight gain during pregnancy, and the majority were either mild or moderate anemic compared to those without STH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted significant differences in prevalence of STH among pregnant women by Kato-Katz microscopy and qPCR. The sensitivity of qPCR for detecting STH was higher than that of Kato-Katz microscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Community Medicine\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900441/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Community Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_249_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_249_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在卫生设施不足的发展中国家,土壤传播蠕虫(STH)感染非常普遍。这些感染可导致营养不良、贫血和其他并发症,从而对孕期母亲和胎儿的健康产生负面影响。这项研究旨在通过卡托-卡茨显微镜检查和定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)估算印度农村孕妇感染 STH 的负担。同时还比较了这两种方法的诊断准确性:在马哈拉施特拉邦沃达区的农村地区开展了一项基于社区的横断面研究。我们随机选取并访问了 688 名孕妇。共有 534 人(77.61%)提供了粪便样本。我们向孕妇发放了两个标有唯一识别码的容器(60 mL),用于收集粪便样本,进行卡托-卡茨显微镜检查和 qPCR 分析。粪便样本在 24 小时内运送到认可实验室进行检查。进行适当的检查以比较两种检测方法的灵敏度:结果:534 名参与者提供了粪便样本。卡托-卡茨粪便显微镜检查的任何 STH 感染率为 6.55%(95%CI 4.46-12.19),qPCR 检查的感染率为 20.41(95%CI 17.53-29.40)。卡托-卡茨显微镜检查的灵敏度为 29.17%,而 qPCR 的灵敏度为 90.83%(P = 0.001)。与未感染 STH 的孕妇相比,感染 STH 的孕妇在怀孕期间体重增加明显较少,而且大多数孕妇有轻度或中度贫血:该研究强调了卡托-卡茨显微镜和 qPCR 在孕妇 STH 感染率上的显著差异。qPCR 检测 STH 的灵敏度高于 Kato-Katz 显微镜检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of the Parasitic Burden of Soil-Transmitted Helminths Among Pregnant Women in the Maharashtra State of India Using qPCR: A Community-Based Study.

Background: Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are widespread in developing countries with inadequate sanitation facilities. These infections can lead to malnutrition, anemia, and other complications that can negatively impact both the mother's and fetus's health during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the burden of STH by Kato-Katz microscopy and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in pregnant women from rural India. The diagnostic accuracy of these two methods was also compared.

Material and methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in rural areas of Wardha district of Maharashtra state. We randomly selected and interviewed 688 pregnant women. A total of 534 (77.61%) participants gave stool samples. Two containers (60 mL) labeled with a unique identification number were given to pregnant women to collect stool samples for Kato-Katz microscopy and qPCR. Stool specimens were transported to an accredited lab and examined within 24 hours. Suitable examinations were conducted to compare sensitivity between two tests.

Results: The results are presented for 534 participants who gave stool samples. The prevalence of any STH by Kato-Katz stool microscopy was 6.55% (95%CI 4.46-12.19), and that by qPCR was 20.41 (95%CI 17.53-29.40). The sensitivity of Kato-Katz microscopy was 29.17% compared to sensitivity of 90.83% by qPCR (P = 0.001). Pregnant women with STH infection have a significantly lower weight gain during pregnancy, and the majority were either mild or moderate anemic compared to those without STH.

Conclusion: The study highlighted significant differences in prevalence of STH among pregnant women by Kato-Katz microscopy and qPCR. The sensitivity of qPCR for detecting STH was higher than that of Kato-Katz microscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Community Medicine
Indian Journal of Community Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Community Medicine (IJCM, ISSN 0970-0218), is the official organ & the only official journal of the Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine (IAPSM). It is a peer-reviewed journal which is published Quarterly. The journal publishes original research articles, focusing on family health care, epidemiology, biostatistics, public health administration, health care delivery, national health problems, medical anthropology and social medicine, invited annotations and comments, invited papers on recent advances, clinical and epidemiological diagnosis and management; editorial correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信