文化上安全的医疗保健:将视角从提供者控制转向患者代理。

Q2 Social Sciences
Mary Bresnahan, Jie Zhuang
{"title":"文化上安全的医疗保健:将视角从提供者控制转向患者代理。","authors":"Mary Bresnahan, Jie Zhuang","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2024.2323856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and goal: </strong>Marginalized patients often feel unwelcome in healthcare. The concept of culturally safe healthcare (CSH) represents an important paradigm shift from provider control to patients who feel safe voicing health concerns and believe that they are heard by providers. This study has five goals: review works describing CSH, identify CSH themes, describe provider behaviors associated with CSH, describe interventions, and discuss how health communication can advance CSH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted for articles published between 2019 and 2023 following modified PRISMA guidelines. Online databases included Pubmed (Medline), CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Redalyc. Thematic analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified and analyzed. Of these, five explained features of CSH, four were empirical studies, seven were content analyses, and five were interventions. Five themes were identified including (1) how patients perceive CSH, (2) sociocultural determinants of health inequity, (3) mistrust of care providers, (4) issues with the biomedical model of healthcare, and (5) the importance of provider-patient allyship. Care provider communication behaviors fostering CSH were discussed. Three CSH interventions were highlighted. Finally, there was a discussion for how health communication scholars can contribute to CSH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CSH offers a paradigm shift from provider control to marginalized patients' experience of patient-provider communication. Recommendations for how health communication scholars can contribute to the implementation of CSH included developing guiding theories and measurement, evaluation of CSH outcomes, and conducting focus groups with patients to assess the meaning of cultural safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"244-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culturally safe healthcare: changing the lens from provider control to patient agency.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Bresnahan, Jie Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538068.2024.2323856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and goal: </strong>Marginalized patients often feel unwelcome in healthcare. The concept of culturally safe healthcare (CSH) represents an important paradigm shift from provider control to patients who feel safe voicing health concerns and believe that they are heard by providers. This study has five goals: review works describing CSH, identify CSH themes, describe provider behaviors associated with CSH, describe interventions, and discuss how health communication can advance CSH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted for articles published between 2019 and 2023 following modified PRISMA guidelines. Online databases included Pubmed (Medline), CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Redalyc. Thematic analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified and analyzed. Of these, five explained features of CSH, four were empirical studies, seven were content analyses, and five were interventions. Five themes were identified including (1) how patients perceive CSH, (2) sociocultural determinants of health inequity, (3) mistrust of care providers, (4) issues with the biomedical model of healthcare, and (5) the importance of provider-patient allyship. Care provider communication behaviors fostering CSH were discussed. Three CSH interventions were highlighted. Finally, there was a discussion for how health communication scholars can contribute to CSH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CSH offers a paradigm shift from provider control to marginalized patients' experience of patient-provider communication. Recommendations for how health communication scholars can contribute to the implementation of CSH included developing guiding theories and measurement, evaluation of CSH outcomes, and conducting focus groups with patients to assess the meaning of cultural safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"244-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2024.2323856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2024.2323856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:边缘化患者在医疗保健中常常感到不受欢迎。文化安全医疗保健(CSH)的概念代表了一种重要的范式转变,即从医疗服务提供者的控制转变为患者能够安全地表达健康问题,并相信医疗服务提供者能够听到他们的声音。本研究有五个目标:回顾描述文化安全医疗保健的作品,确定文化安全医疗保健的主题,描述与文化安全医疗保健相关的医疗服务提供者行为,描述干预措施,并讨论健康传播如何促进文化安全医疗保健:根据修改后的 PRISMA 指南,对 2019 年至 2023 年间发表的文章进行了范围界定综述。在线数据库包括 Pubmed (Medline)、CINAHL、Web of Science、Google Scholar 和 Redalyc。此外,还进行了专题分析:确定并分析了 21 篇符合纳入标准的文章。其中,5 篇解释了 CSH 的特征,4 篇为实证研究,7 篇为内容分析,5 篇为干预措施。确定了五个主题,包括(1)患者如何看待 CSH,(2)健康不平等的社会文化决定因素,(3)对护理提供者的不信任,(4)生物医学医疗模式的问题,以及(5)护理提供者与患者结盟的重要性。讨论了促进 CSH 的护理提供者沟通行为。重点介绍了三种 CSH 干预措施。最后,讨论了健康传播学者如何为 CSH 做出贡献:结论:CSH提供了一种范式转变,从医疗服务提供者的控制转变为边缘化患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通体验。关于健康传播学者如何为 CSH 的实施做出贡献的建议包括:制定指导理论和测量方法,评估 CSH 的成果,以及与患者开展焦点小组讨论以评估文化安全的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culturally safe healthcare: changing the lens from provider control to patient agency.

Background and goal: Marginalized patients often feel unwelcome in healthcare. The concept of culturally safe healthcare (CSH) represents an important paradigm shift from provider control to patients who feel safe voicing health concerns and believe that they are heard by providers. This study has five goals: review works describing CSH, identify CSH themes, describe provider behaviors associated with CSH, describe interventions, and discuss how health communication can advance CSH.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted for articles published between 2019 and 2023 following modified PRISMA guidelines. Online databases included Pubmed (Medline), CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Redalyc. Thematic analysis was also conducted.

Results: Twenty-one articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified and analyzed. Of these, five explained features of CSH, four were empirical studies, seven were content analyses, and five were interventions. Five themes were identified including (1) how patients perceive CSH, (2) sociocultural determinants of health inequity, (3) mistrust of care providers, (4) issues with the biomedical model of healthcare, and (5) the importance of provider-patient allyship. Care provider communication behaviors fostering CSH were discussed. Three CSH interventions were highlighted. Finally, there was a discussion for how health communication scholars can contribute to CSH.

Conclusions: CSH offers a paradigm shift from provider control to marginalized patients' experience of patient-provider communication. Recommendations for how health communication scholars can contribute to the implementation of CSH included developing guiding theories and measurement, evaluation of CSH outcomes, and conducting focus groups with patients to assess the meaning of cultural safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信