考察基于社区的参与式研究远程培训的可行性、可接受性和有效性:单臂事后试点研究。

Q2 Medicine
Karen Fortuna, Andrew Bohm, Stephanie Lebby, Kisha Holden, Branka Agic, Theodore D Cosco, Robert Walker
{"title":"考察基于社区的参与式研究远程培训的可行性、可接受性和有效性:单臂事后试点研究。","authors":"Karen Fortuna, Andrew Bohm, Stephanie Lebby, Kisha Holden, Branka Agic, Theodore D Cosco, Robert Walker","doi":"10.2196/48707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past decade, a growing body of scientific evidence has demonstrated that community engagement in research leads to more relevant research, enhances the uptake of research findings, and improves clinical outcomes. Despite the increasing need for the integration of community engagement methodologies into the scientific inquiry, doctoral and master's level competencies in the field of psychiatry often lack dedicated training or coursework on community engagement methodologies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A total of 13 service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists (with specialties ranging from basic science to implementation science) aged 18 and older participated in remote training on community-based participatory research. Data were collected at baseline, 2 days, and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 13 service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists (with specialties ranging from basic science to implementation science) aged 18 and older participated in remote training on community-based participatory research. Data were collected at baseline, 2 days, and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pilot study demonstrated that a 3-month remote training on community-based participatory research (\"Partnership Academy\") was deemed feasible and acceptable by service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists. Improvements were found in research engagement and the quality of partnership. A marked increase in distrust in the medical system was also found. Groups submitted 4 grant applications and published 1 peer-reviewed journal at a 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pre- and postpilot study demonstrated it is possible to train groups of service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists in community-based participatory research. These findings provide preliminary evidence that a 3-month remote training on community-based participatory research (\"Partnership Academy\") is feasible, acceptable, and potentially associated with improvements in research engagement as well as the quality of partnership and output, such as manuscripts and grant applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"e48707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10943423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of Remote Training on Community-Based Participatory Research: Single-Arm Pre-Post Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Fortuna, Andrew Bohm, Stephanie Lebby, Kisha Holden, Branka Agic, Theodore D Cosco, Robert Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/48707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past decade, a growing body of scientific evidence has demonstrated that community engagement in research leads to more relevant research, enhances the uptake of research findings, and improves clinical outcomes. Despite the increasing need for the integration of community engagement methodologies into the scientific inquiry, doctoral and master's level competencies in the field of psychiatry often lack dedicated training or coursework on community engagement methodologies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A total of 13 service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists (with specialties ranging from basic science to implementation science) aged 18 and older participated in remote training on community-based participatory research. Data were collected at baseline, 2 days, and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 13 service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists (with specialties ranging from basic science to implementation science) aged 18 and older participated in remote training on community-based participatory research. Data were collected at baseline, 2 days, and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pilot study demonstrated that a 3-month remote training on community-based participatory research (\\\"Partnership Academy\\\") was deemed feasible and acceptable by service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists. Improvements were found in research engagement and the quality of partnership. A marked increase in distrust in the medical system was also found. Groups submitted 4 grant applications and published 1 peer-reviewed journal at a 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pre- and postpilot study demonstrated it is possible to train groups of service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists in community-based participatory research. These findings provide preliminary evidence that a 3-month remote training on community-based participatory research (\\\"Partnership Academy\\\") is feasible, acceptable, and potentially associated with improvements in research engagement as well as the quality of partnership and output, such as manuscripts and grant applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Participatory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"e48707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10943423/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Participatory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/48707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/48707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的十年中,越来越多的科学证据表明,社区参与研究能够带来更相关的研究,提高研究成果的吸收率,并改善临床结果。尽管将社区参与方法融入科学研究的需求日益增长,但精神病学领域的博士和硕士研究生往往缺乏关于社区参与方法的专门培训或课程:共有 13 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的服务使用者、同伴支持专家、心理健康挑战者的照顾者以及科学家(专业涵盖基础科学到实施科学)参加了关于社区参与式研究的远程培训。数据收集时间为基线、2 天和 3 个月:共有 13 名 18 岁及以上的服务使用者、同伴支持专家、心理健康挑战者的照顾者和科学家(专业涵盖基础科学和实施科学)参加了关于社区参与式研究的远程培训。数据收集时间为基线、2 天和 3 个月:试点研究表明,为期 3 个月的社区参与式研究远程培训("伙伴关系学院")是可行的,服务使用者、同伴支持专家、心理健康挑战者的照顾者和科学家都可以接受。研究参与度和伙伴关系的质量都有所提高。对医疗系统的不信任也明显增加。在为期 3 个月的跟踪调查中,各小组提交了 4 份基金申请,并在同行评审期刊上发表了 1 篇论文:这项试点前和试点后的研究表明,可以对服务使用者、同伴支持专家、精神疾病患者的护理人员以及科学家进行社区参与式研究方面的培训。这些研究结果提供了初步证据,证明为期 3 个月的社区参与式研究远程培训("伙伴关系学院")是可行的、可接受的,并有可能提高研究参与度以及伙伴关系和产出(如手稿和拨款申请)的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of Remote Training on Community-Based Participatory Research: Single-Arm Pre-Post Pilot Study.

Background: Over the past decade, a growing body of scientific evidence has demonstrated that community engagement in research leads to more relevant research, enhances the uptake of research findings, and improves clinical outcomes. Despite the increasing need for the integration of community engagement methodologies into the scientific inquiry, doctoral and master's level competencies in the field of psychiatry often lack dedicated training or coursework on community engagement methodologies.

Objective: A total of 13 service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists (with specialties ranging from basic science to implementation science) aged 18 and older participated in remote training on community-based participatory research. Data were collected at baseline, 2 days, and 3 months.

Methods: A total of 13 service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists (with specialties ranging from basic science to implementation science) aged 18 and older participated in remote training on community-based participatory research. Data were collected at baseline, 2 days, and 3 months.

Results: The pilot study demonstrated that a 3-month remote training on community-based participatory research ("Partnership Academy") was deemed feasible and acceptable by service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists. Improvements were found in research engagement and the quality of partnership. A marked increase in distrust in the medical system was also found. Groups submitted 4 grant applications and published 1 peer-reviewed journal at a 3-month follow-up.

Conclusions: This pre- and postpilot study demonstrated it is possible to train groups of service users, peer support specialists, caregivers of people with mental health challenges, and scientists in community-based participatory research. These findings provide preliminary evidence that a 3-month remote training on community-based participatory research ("Partnership Academy") is feasible, acceptable, and potentially associated with improvements in research engagement as well as the quality of partnership and output, such as manuscripts and grant applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信