基于家庭的自我管理多模式癌症干预与心脏毒性:范围界定综述。

IF 3.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Anna Talty, Roseanne Morris, Carolyn Deighan
{"title":"基于家庭的自我管理多模式癌症干预与心脏毒性:范围界定综述。","authors":"Anna Talty, Roseanne Morris, Carolyn Deighan","doi":"10.1186/s40959-024-00204-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to advancements in methods of cancer treatment, the population of people living with and beyond cancer is dramatically growing. The number of cancer survivors developing cardiovascular diseases and heart failure is also rising, due in part to the cardiotoxic nature of many cancer treatments. Guidelines are being increasingly released, emphasising the need for interdisciplinary action to address this gap in survivorship care. However, the extent to which interventions exist, incorporating the recommendations of cardio-oncology research, remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this scoping review is to assess the nature, extent and remit of existing cancer care interventions and their integration of cardio-oncology principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews Guidelines. Databases were independently searched for articles from 2010 to 2022, by two members of the research team. Data were charted and synthesised using the following criteria: (a) the focus of the intervention (b) the medium of delivery (c) the duration (d) the modalities included in the interventions (e) the research articles associated with each intervention (f) the type of studies conducted (g) key measures used (h) outcomes reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interventions encompassed six key modalities: Psychological Support, Physical Activity, Nutrition, Patient Education, Lifestyle and Caregiver Support. The focus, medium of delivery and duration of interventions varied significantly. While a considerable number of study protocols and pilot studies exist documenting HSMIs, only 25% appear to have progressed beyond this stage of development. Of those that have, the present review did not identify any 'feasible' interventions that covered each of the six modalities, while being generalisable to all cancer survivors and incorporating the recommendations from cardio-oncology research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the substantial volume of research and evidence from the field of cardio-oncology, the findings of this scoping review suggest that the recommendations from guidelines have yet to be successfully translated from theory to practice. There is an opportunity, if not necessity, for cardiac rehabilitation to expand to meet the needs of those living with and beyond cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9804,"journal":{"name":"Cardio-oncology","volume":"10 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home-based self-management multimodal cancer interventions & cardiotoxicity: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Talty, Roseanne Morris, Carolyn Deighan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40959-024-00204-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to advancements in methods of cancer treatment, the population of people living with and beyond cancer is dramatically growing. The number of cancer survivors developing cardiovascular diseases and heart failure is also rising, due in part to the cardiotoxic nature of many cancer treatments. Guidelines are being increasingly released, emphasising the need for interdisciplinary action to address this gap in survivorship care. However, the extent to which interventions exist, incorporating the recommendations of cardio-oncology research, remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this scoping review is to assess the nature, extent and remit of existing cancer care interventions and their integration of cardio-oncology principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews Guidelines. Databases were independently searched for articles from 2010 to 2022, by two members of the research team. Data were charted and synthesised using the following criteria: (a) the focus of the intervention (b) the medium of delivery (c) the duration (d) the modalities included in the interventions (e) the research articles associated with each intervention (f) the type of studies conducted (g) key measures used (h) outcomes reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interventions encompassed six key modalities: Psychological Support, Physical Activity, Nutrition, Patient Education, Lifestyle and Caregiver Support. The focus, medium of delivery and duration of interventions varied significantly. While a considerable number of study protocols and pilot studies exist documenting HSMIs, only 25% appear to have progressed beyond this stage of development. Of those that have, the present review did not identify any 'feasible' interventions that covered each of the six modalities, while being generalisable to all cancer survivors and incorporating the recommendations from cardio-oncology research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the substantial volume of research and evidence from the field of cardio-oncology, the findings of this scoping review suggest that the recommendations from guidelines have yet to be successfully translated from theory to practice. There is an opportunity, if not necessity, for cardiac rehabilitation to expand to meet the needs of those living with and beyond cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardio-oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardio-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-024-00204-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardio-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-024-00204-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于癌症治疗方法的进步,癌症患者和癌症晚期患者的人数急剧增加。癌症幸存者中患心血管疾病和心力衰竭的人数也在增加,部分原因是许多癌症治疗方法具有心脏毒性。越来越多的指南发布,强调需要采取跨学科行动来解决幸存者护理方面的这一差距。然而,结合心脏肿瘤学研究的建议采取干预措施的程度仍未确定:本范围综述旨在评估现有癌症护理干预措施的性质、范围和职责,以及这些措施与心脏病肿瘤学原则的结合情况:本综述根据《PRISMA 扩展范围综述指南》进行。研究小组的两名成员独立检索了数据库中 2010 年至 2022 年的文章。采用以下标准对数据进行图表化和综合:(a) 干预的重点 (b) 干预的媒介 (c) 干预的持续时间 (d) 干预所包括的方式 (e) 与每种干预相关的研究文章 (f) 所进行的研究类型 (g) 所使用的关键测量方法 (h) 所报告的结果:干预措施包括六种主要方式:结果:干预措施包括六种主要方式:心理支持、体育锻炼、营养、患者教育、生活方式和护理人员支持。干预的重点、实施媒介和持续时间差异很大。虽然有相当多的研究方案和试点研究记录了 HSMIs,但似乎只有 25% 的研究方案和试点研究超越了这一发展阶段。在已完成的研究中,本综述并未发现任何 "可行 "的干预措施,既能涵盖六种方式中的每一种,又能适用于所有癌症幸存者,并纳入了心脏病学研究的建议:尽管心脏肿瘤学领域有大量的研究和证据,但本次范围界定审查的结果表明,指南中的建议尚未成功地从理论转化为实践。心脏康复有机会(如果不是必须)扩大范围,以满足癌症患者及癌症后患者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home-based self-management multimodal cancer interventions & cardiotoxicity: a scoping review.

Background: Due to advancements in methods of cancer treatment, the population of people living with and beyond cancer is dramatically growing. The number of cancer survivors developing cardiovascular diseases and heart failure is also rising, due in part to the cardiotoxic nature of many cancer treatments. Guidelines are being increasingly released, emphasising the need for interdisciplinary action to address this gap in survivorship care. However, the extent to which interventions exist, incorporating the recommendations of cardio-oncology research, remains undetermined.

Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to assess the nature, extent and remit of existing cancer care interventions and their integration of cardio-oncology principles.

Methods: The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews Guidelines. Databases were independently searched for articles from 2010 to 2022, by two members of the research team. Data were charted and synthesised using the following criteria: (a) the focus of the intervention (b) the medium of delivery (c) the duration (d) the modalities included in the interventions (e) the research articles associated with each intervention (f) the type of studies conducted (g) key measures used (h) outcomes reported.

Results: Interventions encompassed six key modalities: Psychological Support, Physical Activity, Nutrition, Patient Education, Lifestyle and Caregiver Support. The focus, medium of delivery and duration of interventions varied significantly. While a considerable number of study protocols and pilot studies exist documenting HSMIs, only 25% appear to have progressed beyond this stage of development. Of those that have, the present review did not identify any 'feasible' interventions that covered each of the six modalities, while being generalisable to all cancer survivors and incorporating the recommendations from cardio-oncology research.

Conclusion: Despite the substantial volume of research and evidence from the field of cardio-oncology, the findings of this scoping review suggest that the recommendations from guidelines have yet to be successfully translated from theory to practice. There is an opportunity, if not necessity, for cardiac rehabilitation to expand to meet the needs of those living with and beyond cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardio-oncology
Cardio-oncology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信