边做边学还是做而不学?基于活动的学习的潜力与挑战

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
{"title":"边做边学还是做而不学?基于活动的学习的潜力与挑战","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09869-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Engaging learners in activities is an important instructional method. However, the learning-by-doing approach also poses some risks. By analyzing the differences between various types of learning activities, issues of activity-based learning are revealed and discussed. Activity-based learning can consist of relatively simple patterns of motor activity or may involve additional task-related knowledge, resulting in complex activities. Excessive movement or failure to properly integrate motor activity into a task can lead to problems for motor activity–based learning. Elaborate activities, such as letting learners generate drawings, can quickly evolve to secondary tasks in their own right. Demanding learning tasks can create their own cognitive load, resulting in less working memory capacity being available for engaging with the actual content. If activity-based interventions are to be used, as many redundant aspects as possible need to be avoided while providing additional guidance to learners. In addition, it is necessary to consider how task demands transform once tasks are shifted from the physical to the digital world in order to properly acknowledge potential increases in cognitive load. Taken together, this review connects educational and cognitive perspectives on activity-based learning to arrive at models and recommendations that are of high relevance for the digital transformation of education and learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning by Doing or Doing Without Learning? The Potentials and Challenges of Activity-Based Learning\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10648-024-09869-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Engaging learners in activities is an important instructional method. However, the learning-by-doing approach also poses some risks. By analyzing the differences between various types of learning activities, issues of activity-based learning are revealed and discussed. Activity-based learning can consist of relatively simple patterns of motor activity or may involve additional task-related knowledge, resulting in complex activities. Excessive movement or failure to properly integrate motor activity into a task can lead to problems for motor activity–based learning. Elaborate activities, such as letting learners generate drawings, can quickly evolve to secondary tasks in their own right. Demanding learning tasks can create their own cognitive load, resulting in less working memory capacity being available for engaging with the actual content. If activity-based interventions are to be used, as many redundant aspects as possible need to be avoided while providing additional guidance to learners. In addition, it is necessary to consider how task demands transform once tasks are shifted from the physical to the digital world in order to properly acknowledge potential increases in cognitive load. Taken together, this review connects educational and cognitive perspectives on activity-based learning to arrive at models and recommendations that are of high relevance for the digital transformation of education and learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Psychology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09869-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09869-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 让学习者参与活动是一种重要的教学方法。然而,边做边学的方法也存在一些风险。通过分析各类学习活动之间的差异,揭示并讨论了基于活动的学习问题。基于活动的学习可能包括相对简单的运动活动模式,也可能涉及额外的任务相关知识,从而形成复杂的活动。过多的运动或未能将运动活动恰当地融入任务中,都可能导致以运动活动为基础的学习出现问题。精心设计的活动,如让学习者绘制图画,很快就会演变成次要任务。要求苛刻的学习任务可能会产生自身的认知负荷,从而导致可用来学习实际内容的工作记忆容量减少。如果要使用基于活动的干预措施,就必须尽可能避免多余的环节,同时为学习者提供额外的指导。此外,有必要考虑一旦任务从物理世界转移到数字世界,任务需求会如何转变,以便正确认识认知负荷的潜在增加。综上所述,本综述将基于活动的学习的教育视角和认知视角联系在一起,从而得出与教育和学习的数字化转型高度相关的模型和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning by Doing or Doing Without Learning? The Potentials and Challenges of Activity-Based Learning

Abstract

Engaging learners in activities is an important instructional method. However, the learning-by-doing approach also poses some risks. By analyzing the differences between various types of learning activities, issues of activity-based learning are revealed and discussed. Activity-based learning can consist of relatively simple patterns of motor activity or may involve additional task-related knowledge, resulting in complex activities. Excessive movement or failure to properly integrate motor activity into a task can lead to problems for motor activity–based learning. Elaborate activities, such as letting learners generate drawings, can quickly evolve to secondary tasks in their own right. Demanding learning tasks can create their own cognitive load, resulting in less working memory capacity being available for engaging with the actual content. If activity-based interventions are to be used, as many redundant aspects as possible need to be avoided while providing additional guidance to learners. In addition, it is necessary to consider how task demands transform once tasks are shifted from the physical to the digital world in order to properly acknowledge potential increases in cognitive load. Taken together, this review connects educational and cognitive perspectives on activity-based learning to arrive at models and recommendations that are of high relevance for the digital transformation of education and learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信