矫形外科培训期间和培训结束后的研究成果之间的相关性

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Daniel Acevedo , Henson Destiné , Christopher J. Murdock , Dawn LaPorte , Amiethab A. Aiyer
{"title":"矫形外科培训期间和培训结束后的研究成果之间的相关性","authors":"Daniel Acevedo ,&nbsp;Henson Destiné ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Murdock ,&nbsp;Dawn LaPorte ,&nbsp;Amiethab A. Aiyer","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Research experience is mandatory for all Orthopaedic Surgery residency programs. Although the allocation of required protected time and resources varies from program to program, the underlying importance of research remains consistent with mutual benefit to both residents and the program and faculty. Authorship and publications have become the standard metric used to evaluate academic success. This study aimed to determine if there is a correlation between the research productivity of Orthopaedic Surgery trainees and their subsequent research productivity as attending Orthopaedic Surgeons.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the University of Mississippi Orthopaedic Residency Program Research Productivity Rank List, 30 different Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs were analyzed for the names of every graduating surgeon in their 2013 class. PubMed Central was used to screen all 156 physicians and collect all publications produced by them between 2008 and August 2022. Results were separated into two categories: Publications during training and Publications post-training.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As defined above, 156 Surgeons were analyzed for publications during training and post-training. The mean number of publications was 7.02 ± 17.819 post-training vs. 2.47 ± 4.313 during training, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001. The range of publication post-training was 0–124 vs. 0–30 during training. Pearson correlation between the two groups resulted in a value of 0.654, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Higher research productivity while training correlates to higher productivity post-training, but overall Orthopaedic surgeons produce more research after training than during. With the growing importance of research, more mentorship, time, and resources must be dedicated to research to instill and foster greater participation while in training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000319/pdfft?md5=b9281ff5ba6df056798fbdcf7f5a1f91&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000319-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between research productivity during and after orthopaedic surgery training\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Acevedo ,&nbsp;Henson Destiné ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Murdock ,&nbsp;Dawn LaPorte ,&nbsp;Amiethab A. Aiyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.02.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Research experience is mandatory for all Orthopaedic Surgery residency programs. Although the allocation of required protected time and resources varies from program to program, the underlying importance of research remains consistent with mutual benefit to both residents and the program and faculty. Authorship and publications have become the standard metric used to evaluate academic success. This study aimed to determine if there is a correlation between the research productivity of Orthopaedic Surgery trainees and their subsequent research productivity as attending Orthopaedic Surgeons.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the University of Mississippi Orthopaedic Residency Program Research Productivity Rank List, 30 different Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs were analyzed for the names of every graduating surgeon in their 2013 class. PubMed Central was used to screen all 156 physicians and collect all publications produced by them between 2008 and August 2022. Results were separated into two categories: Publications during training and Publications post-training.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As defined above, 156 Surgeons were analyzed for publications during training and post-training. The mean number of publications was 7.02 ± 17.819 post-training vs. 2.47 ± 4.313 during training, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001. The range of publication post-training was 0–124 vs. 0–30 during training. Pearson correlation between the two groups resulted in a value of 0.654, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Higher research productivity while training correlates to higher productivity post-training, but overall Orthopaedic surgeons produce more research after training than during. With the growing importance of research, more mentorship, time, and resources must be dedicated to research to instill and foster greater participation while in training.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000319/pdfft?md5=b9281ff5ba6df056798fbdcf7f5a1f91&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000319-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景研究经历是所有骨科住院医师培训项目的必修课程。尽管各项目分配的所需保护时间和资源各不相同,但研究的根本重要性始终如一,对住院医师、项目和教师都是互惠互利的。作者身份和出版物已成为评估学术成就的标准指标。本研究旨在确定矫形外科受训者的研究生产率与他们作为矫形外科主治医师的后续研究生产率之间是否存在关联。方法利用密西西比大学矫形外科住院医师项目研究生产率排名表,分析了 30 个不同的矫形外科住院医师项目,以了解其 2013 届毕业的每一位外科医生的姓名。利用 PubMed Central 筛选了所有 156 名医生,并收集了他们在 2008 年至 2022 年 8 月期间发表的所有论文。结果分为两类:结果如上所述,对 156 名外科医生在培训期间和培训后发表的论文进行了分析。培训后发表论文的平均数量为 7.02 ± 17.819 篇,培训期间为 2.47 ± 4.313 篇,P < 0.001。培训后发表论文的范围为 0-124 篇,而培训期间为 0-30 篇。两组之间的 Pearson 相关性值为 0.654,P <0.001。结论培训期间的研究生产率越高,培训后的生产率也越高,但总体而言,骨科外科医生在培训后的研究成果要多于培训期间。随着研究的重要性与日俱增,必须为研究提供更多的指导、时间和资源,以灌输和促进在培训期间更多地参与研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between research productivity during and after orthopaedic surgery training

Background

Research experience is mandatory for all Orthopaedic Surgery residency programs. Although the allocation of required protected time and resources varies from program to program, the underlying importance of research remains consistent with mutual benefit to both residents and the program and faculty. Authorship and publications have become the standard metric used to evaluate academic success. This study aimed to determine if there is a correlation between the research productivity of Orthopaedic Surgery trainees and their subsequent research productivity as attending Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Methods

Using the University of Mississippi Orthopaedic Residency Program Research Productivity Rank List, 30 different Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs were analyzed for the names of every graduating surgeon in their 2013 class. PubMed Central was used to screen all 156 physicians and collect all publications produced by them between 2008 and August 2022. Results were separated into two categories: Publications during training and Publications post-training.

Results

As defined above, 156 Surgeons were analyzed for publications during training and post-training. The mean number of publications was 7.02 ± 17.819 post-training vs. 2.47 ± 4.313 during training, P < 0.001. The range of publication post-training was 0–124 vs. 0–30 during training. Pearson correlation between the two groups resulted in a value of 0.654, P < 0.001.

Conclusion

Higher research productivity while training correlates to higher productivity post-training, but overall Orthopaedic surgeons produce more research after training than during. With the growing importance of research, more mentorship, time, and resources must be dedicated to research to instill and foster greater participation while in training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信