在全膝关节置换术中，胫骨组件孤立翻修能否替代胫骨组件孤立无菌松动？

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS

Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22038/ABJS.2023.71428.3338

E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan

{"title":"在全膝关节置换术中，胫骨组件孤立翻修能否替代胫骨组件孤立无菌松动？","authors":"E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2023.71428.3338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews the information on isolated tibial component revision for isolated aseptic loosening of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It summarizes the results of recent major studies published in PubMed since the beginning of the search engine until 28 March 2023. Sixty-five articles were found, of which only five were analyzed because they were directly related to the title of this article. At 5-year follow-up isolated tibial revision and both-component (femoral and tibial) revision for aseptic loosening did not differ with regard to failures of the implant, adverse events, and clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Isolated Tibial Component Revision Be an Alternative to Isolated Aseptic Loosening of the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty?\",\"authors\":\"E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/ABJS.2023.71428.3338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reviews the information on isolated tibial component revision for isolated aseptic loosening of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It summarizes the results of recent major studies published in PubMed since the beginning of the search engine until 28 March 2023. Sixty-five articles were found, of which only five were analyzed because they were directly related to the title of this article. At 5-year follow-up isolated tibial revision and both-component (femoral and tibial) revision for aseptic loosening did not differ with regard to failures of the implant, adverse events, and clinical outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2023.71428.3338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2023.71428.3338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了全膝关节置换术（TKA）中因胫骨组件孤立性无菌性松动而进行胫骨组件孤立性翻修的相关信息。文章总结了自搜索引擎开通以来至 2023 年 3 月 28 日在 PubMed 上发表的近期主要研究结果。共找到 65 篇文章，由于与本文标题直接相关，因此只对其中 5 篇文章进行了分析。在5年的随访中，因无菌性松动而进行的孤立胫骨翻修术和双组件（股骨和胫骨）翻修术在植入失败、不良事件和临床结果方面没有差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Can Isolated Tibial Component Revision Be an Alternative to Isolated Aseptic Loosening of the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

This article reviews the information on isolated tibial component revision for isolated aseptic loosening of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It summarizes the results of recent major studies published in PubMed since the beginning of the search engine until 28 March 2023. Sixty-five articles were found, of which only five were analyzed because they were directly related to the title of this article. At 5-year follow-up isolated tibial revision and both-component (femoral and tibial) revision for aseptic loosening did not differ with regard to failures of the implant, adverse events, and clinical outcomes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS ORTHOPEDICS-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

128

期刊介绍： The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).