Er:YAG 激光治疗下颌第三磨牙术后牙槽骨炎:随机对照临床研究。

IF 1.8 Q2 SURGERY
Yang Han, Jie Zhu, Xiqian Zhang, Suning Hu, Cong Li
{"title":"Er:YAG 激光治疗下颌第三磨牙术后牙槽骨炎:随机对照临床研究。","authors":"Yang Han, Jie Zhu, Xiqian Zhang, Suning Hu, Cong Li","doi":"10.1089/photob.2023.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Alveolar osteitis (AO) or \"dry socket\" affects the quality of life of patients, and there is a high clinical demand for its effective treatment. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the effect of Er:YAG laser therapy (ErLT) on AO after mandibular third molar surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eighty-three patients were randomly divided into Er (<i>n</i> = 43) and control groups (<i>n</i> = 40). In the Er group, the Er:YAG laser (2940 nm; AT Fidelis Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used to irradiate the AO site directly in micro short-pulsed mode (pulse duration 0.1 ms, pulse energy 100 mJ, frequency 40 Hz, water 4, and air 2) until all debris and necrotic material had been removed, exposing fresh bone and soft tissue surfaces with blood exudation. The control group received mechanical therapy until the treated lesions resembled those in the Er group. Pain assessment was performed at baseline and on days 1-7 post-intervention using the visual analog scale (VAS). Wound healing was assessed using the wound healing index (WHI). The operating times of the two therapies were also recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Group Er had lower VAS scores than the control group on days 1-3 (<i>p</i> = 0.00). There was no significant difference between the two groups on days 4-7 (<i>p</i> = 0.15). The WHI scores were better in the Er group than those in the control group (<i>t</i> = 2.65, <i>p</i> = 0.01), especially in terms of redness (<i>t</i> = 2.70, <i>p</i> = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the operating time between the two groups (<i>t</i> = 0.76, <i>p</i> = 0.45). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Compared with mechanical therapy, ErLT for AO provides rapid pain relief and improved wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":" ","pages":"238-245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Er:YAG Laser Therapy on Alveolar Osteitis After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Han, Jie Zhu, Xiqian Zhang, Suning Hu, Cong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/photob.2023.0151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Alveolar osteitis (AO) or \\\"dry socket\\\" affects the quality of life of patients, and there is a high clinical demand for its effective treatment. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the effect of Er:YAG laser therapy (ErLT) on AO after mandibular third molar surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eighty-three patients were randomly divided into Er (<i>n</i> = 43) and control groups (<i>n</i> = 40). In the Er group, the Er:YAG laser (2940 nm; AT Fidelis Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used to irradiate the AO site directly in micro short-pulsed mode (pulse duration 0.1 ms, pulse energy 100 mJ, frequency 40 Hz, water 4, and air 2) until all debris and necrotic material had been removed, exposing fresh bone and soft tissue surfaces with blood exudation. The control group received mechanical therapy until the treated lesions resembled those in the Er group. Pain assessment was performed at baseline and on days 1-7 post-intervention using the visual analog scale (VAS). Wound healing was assessed using the wound healing index (WHI). The operating times of the two therapies were also recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Group Er had lower VAS scores than the control group on days 1-3 (<i>p</i> = 0.00). There was no significant difference between the two groups on days 4-7 (<i>p</i> = 0.15). The WHI scores were better in the Er group than those in the control group (<i>t</i> = 2.65, <i>p</i> = 0.01), especially in terms of redness (<i>t</i> = 2.70, <i>p</i> = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the operating time between the two groups (<i>t</i> = 0.76, <i>p</i> = 0.45). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Compared with mechanical therapy, ErLT for AO provides rapid pain relief and improved wound healing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"238-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙槽骨炎(AO)或 "干槽症 "影响患者的生活质量,临床上对其有效治疗的需求很高。目的:评估评估 Er:YAG 激光疗法(ErLT)对下颌第三磨牙术后 AO 的影响。方法:将 83 例患者随机分为 Er 组(43 例)和对照组(40 例)。铒组使用 Er:YAG 激光器(2940 nm;AT Fidelis Fotona,斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那)以微短脉冲模式直接照射 AO部位(脉冲持续时间 0.1 ms,脉冲能量 100 mJ,频率 40 Hz,水 4,空气 2),直至所有碎屑和坏死物质被清除,露出新鲜的骨和软组织表面,并有血液渗出。对照组接受机械治疗,直到治疗后的病变与 Er 组相似。疼痛评估在基线和干预后第 1-7 天使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行。伤口愈合采用伤口愈合指数(WHI)进行评估。同时还记录了两种疗法的操作时间。结果显示第 1-3 天,Er 组的 VAS 评分低于对照组(P = 0.00)。两组在第 4-7 天没有明显差异(P = 0.15)。Er 组的 WHI 评分优于对照组(t = 2.65,p = 0.01),尤其是在发红方面(t = 2.70,p = 0.01)。两组的手术时间无明显差异(t = 0.76,p = 0.45)。结论与机械疗法相比,用于 AO 的 ErLT 能迅速缓解疼痛并改善伤口愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Er:YAG Laser Therapy on Alveolar Osteitis After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

Background: Alveolar osteitis (AO) or "dry socket" affects the quality of life of patients, and there is a high clinical demand for its effective treatment. Objective: To evaluate the effect of Er:YAG laser therapy (ErLT) on AO after mandibular third molar surgery. Methods: Eighty-three patients were randomly divided into Er (n = 43) and control groups (n = 40). In the Er group, the Er:YAG laser (2940 nm; AT Fidelis Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used to irradiate the AO site directly in micro short-pulsed mode (pulse duration 0.1 ms, pulse energy 100 mJ, frequency 40 Hz, water 4, and air 2) until all debris and necrotic material had been removed, exposing fresh bone and soft tissue surfaces with blood exudation. The control group received mechanical therapy until the treated lesions resembled those in the Er group. Pain assessment was performed at baseline and on days 1-7 post-intervention using the visual analog scale (VAS). Wound healing was assessed using the wound healing index (WHI). The operating times of the two therapies were also recorded. Results: Group Er had lower VAS scores than the control group on days 1-3 (p = 0.00). There was no significant difference between the two groups on days 4-7 (p = 0.15). The WHI scores were better in the Er group than those in the control group (t = 2.65, p = 0.01), especially in terms of redness (t = 2.70, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the operating time between the two groups (t = 0.76, p = 0.45). Conclusions: Compared with mechanical therapy, ErLT for AO provides rapid pain relief and improved wound healing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信