使用 TIDieR 识别糖尿病预防计划中的干预特征:范围界定综述。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Megan M. MacPherson PhD, Cara Johnston BHK, Kaela D. Cranston MSc, Sarah Der BKin, Jenna A.P. Sim BHK, Mary E. Jung PhD
{"title":"使用 TIDieR 识别糖尿病预防计划中的干预特征:范围界定综述。","authors":"Megan M. MacPherson PhD,&nbsp;Cara Johnston BHK,&nbsp;Kaela D. Cranston MSc,&nbsp;Sarah Der BKin,&nbsp;Jenna A.P. Sim BHK,&nbsp;Mary E. Jung PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) targeting dietary and physical activity behaviour change have been shown to decrease the incidence of type 2 diabetes; however, a more thorough reporting of intervention characteristics is needed to expedite the translation of such programs into different communities. In this scoping review, we aim to synthesize how DPPs are being reported and implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review using Arkey and O’Malley methods was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus were searched for studies relating to diabetes prevention and diet/exercise interventions. Only studies delivering a diet/exercise intervention for adults identified as “at risk” for developing type 2 diabetes were included. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was used to guide data extraction, and each DPP was scored on a scale from 0 to 2 for how thoroughly it reported each of the items (0 = did not report, 2 = reported in full; total score out of 26).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 25,110 publications screened, 351 (based on 220 programs) met the inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. No studies comprehensively reported on all TIDieR domains (mean TIDieR score: 15.7 of 26; range 7 to 25). Reporting was particularly poor among domains related to “modifications,” “tailoring,” and “how well (planned/actual).” \"How well (planned)\" assesses the intended delivery of an intervention, detailing the initial strategies and components as per the original design, whereas \"how well (actual)\" evaluates the extent to which the intervention was executed as planned during the study, including any deviations or modifications made in practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although there is evidence to suggest that DPPs are efficacious, a more thorough reporting of program content and delivery is needed to improve the ability for effective programs to be implemented or translated into different communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9565,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Intervention Characteristics Within Diabetes Prevention Programs Using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Megan M. MacPherson PhD,&nbsp;Cara Johnston BHK,&nbsp;Kaela D. Cranston MSc,&nbsp;Sarah Der BKin,&nbsp;Jenna A.P. Sim BHK,&nbsp;Mary E. Jung PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) targeting dietary and physical activity behaviour change have been shown to decrease the incidence of type 2 diabetes; however, a more thorough reporting of intervention characteristics is needed to expedite the translation of such programs into different communities. In this scoping review, we aim to synthesize how DPPs are being reported and implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review using Arkey and O’Malley methods was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus were searched for studies relating to diabetes prevention and diet/exercise interventions. Only studies delivering a diet/exercise intervention for adults identified as “at risk” for developing type 2 diabetes were included. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was used to guide data extraction, and each DPP was scored on a scale from 0 to 2 for how thoroughly it reported each of the items (0 = did not report, 2 = reported in full; total score out of 26).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 25,110 publications screened, 351 (based on 220 programs) met the inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. No studies comprehensively reported on all TIDieR domains (mean TIDieR score: 15.7 of 26; range 7 to 25). Reporting was particularly poor among domains related to “modifications,” “tailoring,” and “how well (planned/actual).” \\\"How well (planned)\\\" assesses the intended delivery of an intervention, detailing the initial strategies and components as per the original design, whereas \\\"how well (actual)\\\" evaluates the extent to which the intervention was executed as planned during the study, including any deviations or modifications made in practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although there is evidence to suggest that DPPs are efficacious, a more thorough reporting of program content and delivery is needed to improve the ability for effective programs to be implemented or translated into different communities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Diabetes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499267124000467\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499267124000467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以改变饮食和体育锻炼行为为目标的糖尿病预防计划已被证明可降低 2 型糖尿病的发病率;然而,需要对干预措施的特点进行更全面的报告,以加快将此类计划转化到不同社区。本范围综述旨在综合糖尿病预防计划的报告和实施情况:根据 PRISMA 指南,按照 Arkey 和 O'Malley 方法进行了范围界定综述。在 Medline、CINAHL、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和 SPORTDiscus 中检索了与糖尿病预防和饮食/运动干预相关的研究。只有在被确定为有罹患 2 型糖尿病 "风险 "的成年人中进行饮食/运动干预的研究才被纳入。采用干预措施描述和复制模板(TIDieR)指导数据提取,并对每项干预措施报告每个项目的详尽程度从0到2打分(0=未报告;2=全面报告;总分/26):在筛选出的 25110 篇出版物中,有 351 篇出版物(基于 220 个项目)符合纳入标准,并被纳入数据提取范围。没有研究全面报告了 TIDieR 的所有领域(TIDieR 平均得分 = 15.7/26;范围为 7 至 25)。在与 "修改"、"量身定制 "和"(计划/实际)效果如何 "相关的领域中,报告情况尤为欠佳。"(计划的)效果如何 "评估的是干预的预期实施情况,详细说明了最初设计的策略和组成部分,而"(实际的)效果如何 "评估的是干预在研究期间按计划实施的程度,包括在实践中出现的任何偏差或修改:尽管有证据表明糖尿病预防计划是有效的,但需要对计划内容和实施情况进行更全面的报告,以提高有效计划在不同社区实施或转化的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Intervention Characteristics Within Diabetes Prevention Programs Using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication: A Scoping Review

Objectives

Diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) targeting dietary and physical activity behaviour change have been shown to decrease the incidence of type 2 diabetes; however, a more thorough reporting of intervention characteristics is needed to expedite the translation of such programs into different communities. In this scoping review, we aim to synthesize how DPPs are being reported and implemented.

Methods

A scoping review using Arkey and O’Malley methods was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus were searched for studies relating to diabetes prevention and diet/exercise interventions. Only studies delivering a diet/exercise intervention for adults identified as “at risk” for developing type 2 diabetes were included. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was used to guide data extraction, and each DPP was scored on a scale from 0 to 2 for how thoroughly it reported each of the items (0 = did not report, 2 = reported in full; total score out of 26).

Results

Of the 25,110 publications screened, 351 (based on 220 programs) met the inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. No studies comprehensively reported on all TIDieR domains (mean TIDieR score: 15.7 of 26; range 7 to 25). Reporting was particularly poor among domains related to “modifications,” “tailoring,” and “how well (planned/actual).” "How well (planned)" assesses the intended delivery of an intervention, detailing the initial strategies and components as per the original design, whereas "how well (actual)" evaluates the extent to which the intervention was executed as planned during the study, including any deviations or modifications made in practice.

Conclusions

Although there is evidence to suggest that DPPs are efficacious, a more thorough reporting of program content and delivery is needed to improve the ability for effective programs to be implemented or translated into different communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Canadian Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Diabetes is Canada''s only diabetes-oriented, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal for diabetes health-care professionals. Published bimonthly, the Canadian Journal of Diabetes contains original articles; reviews; case reports; shorter articles such as Perspectives in Practice, Practical Diabetes and Innovations in Diabetes Care; Diabetes Dilemmas and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信