荷尔蒙或热敏男性避孕药具的实际使用者:分析女性伴侣的动机、体验和满意度。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1111/andr.13608
Clothilde Laurent, Roger Mieusset, Jean-Claude Soufir, Jeanne Perrin
{"title":"荷尔蒙或热敏男性避孕药具的实际使用者:分析女性伴侣的动机、体验和满意度。","authors":"Clothilde Laurent, Roger Mieusset, Jean-Claude Soufir, Jeanne Perrin","doi":"10.1111/andr.13608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two male contraceptive methods that inhibit spermatogenesis currently exist: thermal male contraception and hormonal male contraception. Only five studies have been conducted on the acceptability of these methods among men; among women, only the hypothetical acceptability of such a male contraceptive approach as the sole contraception method used by a couple has been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the motivation, experience, and satisfaction of female partners in couples using hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception as the sole contraception.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 123 male users of hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception as the couple's sole contraception method were asked to invite their female partner to participate in an anonymous online survey. The questionnaire included 95 questions exploring population characteristics, contraceptive and pregnancy history, motivations for choosing hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception, the experience of the women in the successive phase of use, relationships with their partner, and satisfaction with the contraception method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate among participating women was 69% (59/86). The two main reasons for choosing male contraceptive were the desire to share the contraception role in the couple (65%) and the desire of the man to take charge of the contraception (61%). The sexual satisfaction score increased significantly between the contraceptive methods used before hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception and the phase of contraceptive use (p < 0.01). The overall satisfaction level with thermal male contraception or hormonal male contraception was rated at 3.7 ± 0.6 out of 4. Women mostly recommended hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception because of the share of contraceptive responsibility and mental load (n = 23/54, 43%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This population of women seemed to have struggled to find a contraceptive method that suited them, but most took advantage of thermal male contraception or hormonal male contraception and trusted their male partner to take charge of contraception use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The positive evaluation from women in partnerships using thermal male contraception and hormonal male contraception should encourage the development of these methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-life users of hormonal or thermal male contraception: An analysis of female partners' motivation, experience, and satisfaction.\",\"authors\":\"Clothilde Laurent, Roger Mieusset, Jean-Claude Soufir, Jeanne Perrin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/andr.13608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two male contraceptive methods that inhibit spermatogenesis currently exist: thermal male contraception and hormonal male contraception. Only five studies have been conducted on the acceptability of these methods among men; among women, only the hypothetical acceptability of such a male contraceptive approach as the sole contraception method used by a couple has been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the motivation, experience, and satisfaction of female partners in couples using hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception as the sole contraception.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 123 male users of hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception as the couple's sole contraception method were asked to invite their female partner to participate in an anonymous online survey. The questionnaire included 95 questions exploring population characteristics, contraceptive and pregnancy history, motivations for choosing hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception, the experience of the women in the successive phase of use, relationships with their partner, and satisfaction with the contraception method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate among participating women was 69% (59/86). The two main reasons for choosing male contraceptive were the desire to share the contraception role in the couple (65%) and the desire of the man to take charge of the contraception (61%). The sexual satisfaction score increased significantly between the contraceptive methods used before hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception and the phase of contraceptive use (p < 0.01). The overall satisfaction level with thermal male contraception or hormonal male contraception was rated at 3.7 ± 0.6 out of 4. Women mostly recommended hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception because of the share of contraceptive responsibility and mental load (n = 23/54, 43%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This population of women seemed to have struggled to find a contraceptive method that suited them, but most took advantage of thermal male contraception or hormonal male contraception and trusted their male partner to take charge of contraception use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The positive evaluation from women in partnerships using thermal male contraception and hormonal male contraception should encourage the development of these methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13608\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前有两种抑制精子生成的男性避孕方法:热敏男性避孕法和激素男性避孕法。关于这些方法在男性中的可接受性,目前只进行了五项研究;在女性中,只评估了将这种男性避孕方法作为夫妇唯一避孕方法的假设可接受性:评估使用荷尔蒙男性避孕法或热敏男性避孕法作为唯一避孕方法的夫妇中女性伴侣的动机、经验和满意度:在这项横断面研究中,123 名使用激素类男性避孕药或热效男性避孕药作为夫妇唯一避孕方法的男性用户被要求邀请其女性伴侣参与匿名在线调查。问卷包括 95 个问题,内容涉及人群特征、避孕史和怀孕史、选择激素类男性避孕药或热敏男性避孕药的动机、女性在连续使用阶段的经历、与伴侣的关系以及对避孕方法的满意度:参与调查的妇女的回复率为 69%(59/86)。选择男性避孕药具的两个主要原因是希望在夫妇中分担避孕责任(65%)和希望男性负责避孕(61%)。在使用激素男性避孕药或热敏男性避孕药之前使用的避孕方法与使用避孕药的阶段之间,性满意度得分明显增加(p 讨论):这部分女性似乎一直在努力寻找适合自己的避孕方法,但大多数人利用了男性热避孕法或男性荷尔蒙避孕法,并相信她们的男性伴侣会负责避孕措施的使用:使用热敏男性避孕法和荷尔蒙男性避孕法的女性伴侣给予的积极评价应鼓励这些方法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-life users of hormonal or thermal male contraception: An analysis of female partners' motivation, experience, and satisfaction.

Background: Two male contraceptive methods that inhibit spermatogenesis currently exist: thermal male contraception and hormonal male contraception. Only five studies have been conducted on the acceptability of these methods among men; among women, only the hypothetical acceptability of such a male contraceptive approach as the sole contraception method used by a couple has been evaluated.

Objectives: To evaluate the motivation, experience, and satisfaction of female partners in couples using hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception as the sole contraception.

Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 123 male users of hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception as the couple's sole contraception method were asked to invite their female partner to participate in an anonymous online survey. The questionnaire included 95 questions exploring population characteristics, contraceptive and pregnancy history, motivations for choosing hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception, the experience of the women in the successive phase of use, relationships with their partner, and satisfaction with the contraception method.

Results: The response rate among participating women was 69% (59/86). The two main reasons for choosing male contraceptive were the desire to share the contraception role in the couple (65%) and the desire of the man to take charge of the contraception (61%). The sexual satisfaction score increased significantly between the contraceptive methods used before hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception and the phase of contraceptive use (p < 0.01). The overall satisfaction level with thermal male contraception or hormonal male contraception was rated at 3.7 ± 0.6 out of 4. Women mostly recommended hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception because of the share of contraceptive responsibility and mental load (n = 23/54, 43%).

Discussion: This population of women seemed to have struggled to find a contraceptive method that suited them, but most took advantage of thermal male contraception or hormonal male contraception and trusted their male partner to take charge of contraception use.

Conclusion: The positive evaluation from women in partnerships using thermal male contraception and hormonal male contraception should encourage the development of these methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信