利用大规模智能卡数据建立基于经验学习的公交路线选择模型

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jacqueline Arriagada, C. Angelo Guevara, Marcela Munizaga, Song Gao
{"title":"利用大规模智能卡数据建立基于经验学习的公交路线选择模型","authors":"Jacqueline Arriagada, C. Angelo Guevara, Marcela Munizaga, Song Gao","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10465-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Taking learning into account when modelling passengers’ route choice behaviour improves understanding and forecasting of their preferences, which helps stakeholders better design public transport systems to meet user needs. Most empirical studies have neglected the relationship between current choices and passengers’ past experiences that lead to a learning process about route attributes. This study addresses this gap by using real observed choices from smart-card data to implement a route choice model that takes into account the learning process of passengers during the inauguration of a new metro line in Santiago, Chile. An instance-based learning (IBL) model is used to represent individually perceived in-vehicle travel time in the route choice model. It accounts for recency and reinforcement of experience using the power law of forgetting. The empirical evaluation uses 8 weeks of smart-card data after the introduction of the metro line. Model parameters are evaluated, and the fit and behavioural coherence achieved by the IBL route choice model is measured against a baseline model. The baseline model neglects passenger learning from experience and assumes that all passengers use only trip descriptive information in their decision-making process. The IBL route choice model outperforms the baseline model from the fourth week after the introduction of the metro line. This empirical evidence supports the notion that after the introduction of a new metro line, passengers initially rely on descriptive travel information to estimate travel times for new alternatives. After a few weeks, they begin to incorporate their own experiences to update their perceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An experiential learning-based transit route choice model using large-scale smart-card data\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Arriagada, C. Angelo Guevara, Marcela Munizaga, Song Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-024-10465-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Taking learning into account when modelling passengers’ route choice behaviour improves understanding and forecasting of their preferences, which helps stakeholders better design public transport systems to meet user needs. Most empirical studies have neglected the relationship between current choices and passengers’ past experiences that lead to a learning process about route attributes. This study addresses this gap by using real observed choices from smart-card data to implement a route choice model that takes into account the learning process of passengers during the inauguration of a new metro line in Santiago, Chile. An instance-based learning (IBL) model is used to represent individually perceived in-vehicle travel time in the route choice model. It accounts for recency and reinforcement of experience using the power law of forgetting. The empirical evaluation uses 8 weeks of smart-card data after the introduction of the metro line. Model parameters are evaluated, and the fit and behavioural coherence achieved by the IBL route choice model is measured against a baseline model. The baseline model neglects passenger learning from experience and assumes that all passengers use only trip descriptive information in their decision-making process. The IBL route choice model outperforms the baseline model from the fourth week after the introduction of the metro line. This empirical evidence supports the notion that after the introduction of a new metro line, passengers initially rely on descriptive travel information to estimate travel times for new alternatives. After a few weeks, they begin to incorporate their own experiences to update their perceptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10465-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10465-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在模拟乘客的路线选择行为时考虑到学习因素,可以提高对乘客偏好的理解和预测,从而帮助利益相关方更好地设计公共交通系统,满足用户需求。大多数实证研究都忽视了当前选择与乘客过去经验之间的关系,而乘客过去的经验会导致对路线属性的学习过程。本研究利用从智能卡数据中观察到的真实选择,建立了一个路线选择模型,其中考虑到了智利圣地亚哥一条新地铁线通车期间乘客的学习过程,从而弥补了这一不足。在路线选择模型中,使用基于实例的学习(IBL)模型来表示个人感知的车内旅行时间。该模型利用遗忘幂律考虑了经验的重复性和强化性。实证评估使用了地铁线路开通后 8 周的智能卡数据。对模型参数进行了评估,并对照基线模型对 IBL 线路选择模型的拟合度和行为一致性进行了衡量。基线模型忽略了乘客的经验学习,并假设所有乘客在决策过程中只使用行程描述信息。从地铁线路开通后的第四周开始,IBL 线路选择模型的表现就优于基线模型。这一经验证据支持了这样一种观点,即在引入新的地铁线路后,乘客最初会依赖描述性旅行信息来估算新选择的旅行时间。几周后,他们开始结合自己的经验来更新自己的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An experiential learning-based transit route choice model using large-scale smart-card data

An experiential learning-based transit route choice model using large-scale smart-card data

Taking learning into account when modelling passengers’ route choice behaviour improves understanding and forecasting of their preferences, which helps stakeholders better design public transport systems to meet user needs. Most empirical studies have neglected the relationship between current choices and passengers’ past experiences that lead to a learning process about route attributes. This study addresses this gap by using real observed choices from smart-card data to implement a route choice model that takes into account the learning process of passengers during the inauguration of a new metro line in Santiago, Chile. An instance-based learning (IBL) model is used to represent individually perceived in-vehicle travel time in the route choice model. It accounts for recency and reinforcement of experience using the power law of forgetting. The empirical evaluation uses 8 weeks of smart-card data after the introduction of the metro line. Model parameters are evaluated, and the fit and behavioural coherence achieved by the IBL route choice model is measured against a baseline model. The baseline model neglects passenger learning from experience and assumes that all passengers use only trip descriptive information in their decision-making process. The IBL route choice model outperforms the baseline model from the fourth week after the introduction of the metro line. This empirical evidence supports the notion that after the introduction of a new metro line, passengers initially rely on descriptive travel information to estimate travel times for new alternatives. After a few weeks, they begin to incorporate their own experiences to update their perceptions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信