专题往事:1853-1856 年克里米亚战争期间 1812 年历史记忆的工具化

IF 0.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
D. V. Timofeev
{"title":"专题往事:1853-1856 年克里米亚战争期间 1812 年历史记忆的工具化","authors":"D. V. Timofeev","doi":"10.1134/s1019331623090113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The main methods and forms of updating the historical memory of the events of 1812–1814 in legislative acts, periodicals, brochures, and books are presented. The complex of historical sources on this issue includes manifestos, rescripts, appeals, and letters of Alexander I, citing which contemporaries demonstrated the similarities between the Patriotic War of 1812 and the Eastern (Crimean) War of 1853–1856; a set of issues of the newspaper <i>Severnaya Pchela</i> (Northern Post) (March 1854); and book editions <i>The General Militia of Russia for the Faith, the Tsar, and the Fatherland</i> and <i>The 40th Anniversary of the Russians’ Entry into Paris on March 19, 1814</i>, directly devoted to the comparison of the events of 1812 and 1853–1856. As a result of a comparative contextual analysis of texts of different origins and genre and stylistic features, three content blocks were identified through which the historical memory of the Patriotic War of 1812 and the foreign campaigns of the Russian army was updated in the public space of the Russian Empire during the Crimean War. The first problem–thematic block is represented by texts the authors of which, using historical analogies, showed the contradictory nature of the alliance of England, France, and Turkey against Russia; the disparity between the figures of Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon III; and the “true” goals of the Allies’ participation in the war. The content of the texts conditionally grouped into the second problem–thematic block clearly demonstrates the variety of genres and rhetorical techniques used to justify Russia’s intentions and actions in the comparative retrospective of the two wars. The third problem–thematic block of texts has made it possible to identify the main ways of updating the memory of the conflict that had happened forty years before to show the reader the continuity of generations and the readiness of the entire society to sacrifice themselves to achieve common goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":56335,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Topical Past: Instrumentalization of the Historical Memory of 1812 during the Crimean War of 1853–1856\",\"authors\":\"D. V. Timofeev\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/s1019331623090113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>The main methods and forms of updating the historical memory of the events of 1812–1814 in legislative acts, periodicals, brochures, and books are presented. The complex of historical sources on this issue includes manifestos, rescripts, appeals, and letters of Alexander I, citing which contemporaries demonstrated the similarities between the Patriotic War of 1812 and the Eastern (Crimean) War of 1853–1856; a set of issues of the newspaper <i>Severnaya Pchela</i> (Northern Post) (March 1854); and book editions <i>The General Militia of Russia for the Faith, the Tsar, and the Fatherland</i> and <i>The 40th Anniversary of the Russians’ Entry into Paris on March 19, 1814</i>, directly devoted to the comparison of the events of 1812 and 1853–1856. As a result of a comparative contextual analysis of texts of different origins and genre and stylistic features, three content blocks were identified through which the historical memory of the Patriotic War of 1812 and the foreign campaigns of the Russian army was updated in the public space of the Russian Empire during the Crimean War. The first problem–thematic block is represented by texts the authors of which, using historical analogies, showed the contradictory nature of the alliance of England, France, and Turkey against Russia; the disparity between the figures of Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon III; and the “true” goals of the Allies’ participation in the war. The content of the texts conditionally grouped into the second problem–thematic block clearly demonstrates the variety of genres and rhetorical techniques used to justify Russia’s intentions and actions in the comparative retrospective of the two wars. The third problem–thematic block of texts has made it possible to identify the main ways of updating the memory of the conflict that had happened forty years before to show the reader the continuity of generations and the readiness of the entire society to sacrifice themselves to achieve common goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331623090113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331623090113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘 要 介绍了在法案、期刊、小册子和书籍中更新 1812-1814 年事件历史记忆的主要方法和形式。有关这一问题的历史资料包括亚历山大一世的宣言、诉状、呼吁书和信件,同时代人引用这些资料证明了 1812 年卫国战争与 1853-1856 年东方(克里米亚)战争之间的相似性;一套《北方邮报》(Severnaya Pchela)(1854 年 3 月);以及《为信仰、沙皇和祖国而战的俄罗斯总民兵》和《1814 年 3 月 19 日俄国人进入巴黎 40 周年》两本书,直接用于比较 1812 年和 1853-1856 年的事件。通过对不同来源、体裁和风格特征的文本进行比较分析,确定了三个内容块,通过这三个内容块,克里米亚战争期间俄罗斯帝国的公共空间更新了对 1812 年卫国战争和俄军对外战役的历史记忆。第一个问题主题板块由文本组成,作者通过历史类比,展示了英国、法国和土耳其联合对抗俄罗斯的矛盾本质;拿破仑-波拿巴和拿破仑三世形象之间的差异;以及协约国参战的 "真实 "目标。有条件地归入第二个问题主题组块的文本内容清楚地表明,在两次战争的比较回顾中,俄罗斯为其意图和行动辩护所使用的体裁和修辞手法多种多样。第三个问题专题组的文本使我们有可能确定更新四十年前冲突记忆的主要方式,以向读者展示几代人的连续性和整个社会为实现共同目标而牺牲自己的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Topical Past: Instrumentalization of the Historical Memory of 1812 during the Crimean War of 1853–1856

Abstract

The main methods and forms of updating the historical memory of the events of 1812–1814 in legislative acts, periodicals, brochures, and books are presented. The complex of historical sources on this issue includes manifestos, rescripts, appeals, and letters of Alexander I, citing which contemporaries demonstrated the similarities between the Patriotic War of 1812 and the Eastern (Crimean) War of 1853–1856; a set of issues of the newspaper Severnaya Pchela (Northern Post) (March 1854); and book editions The General Militia of Russia for the Faith, the Tsar, and the Fatherland and The 40th Anniversary of the Russians’ Entry into Paris on March 19, 1814, directly devoted to the comparison of the events of 1812 and 1853–1856. As a result of a comparative contextual analysis of texts of different origins and genre and stylistic features, three content blocks were identified through which the historical memory of the Patriotic War of 1812 and the foreign campaigns of the Russian army was updated in the public space of the Russian Empire during the Crimean War. The first problem–thematic block is represented by texts the authors of which, using historical analogies, showed the contradictory nature of the alliance of England, France, and Turkey against Russia; the disparity between the figures of Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon III; and the “true” goals of the Allies’ participation in the war. The content of the texts conditionally grouped into the second problem–thematic block clearly demonstrates the variety of genres and rhetorical techniques used to justify Russia’s intentions and actions in the comparative retrospective of the two wars. The third problem–thematic block of texts has made it possible to identify the main ways of updating the memory of the conflict that had happened forty years before to show the reader the continuity of generations and the readiness of the entire society to sacrifice themselves to achieve common goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences provides a broad coverage of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ activities. It publishes original works, surveys, speeches, and discussions with participation of the members of Russian Academy of Sciences, leading scientists in Russia and worldwide and presents various viewpoints on important subjects related to all fields of science. The journal addresses the questions of scientist’s role in society and the role of scientific knowledge in the modern world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信