骑自行车者路线选择模式比较研究

Adrian Meister , Zheng Liang , Matteo Felder , Kay W. Axhausen
{"title":"骑自行车者路线选择模式比较研究","authors":"Adrian Meister ,&nbsp;Zheng Liang ,&nbsp;Matteo Felder ,&nbsp;Kay W. Axhausen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2024.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comparison of different route choice models for cyclists. The data includes approx. 3,700 cycling trajectories. The network is derived based on the Open-Street-Map that contains street-level attribute information. We estimate two path-based and one link-based models. We present descriptive statistics, model results, resulting indicators, and compare different validation approaches. The results reveal important differences across the models, especially in context of applications and policy-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000093/pdfft?md5=d44160866fe2f6d0f2ebc89dfb44d47f&pid=1-s2.0-S2950105924000093-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of route choice models for cyclists\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Meister ,&nbsp;Zheng Liang ,&nbsp;Matteo Felder ,&nbsp;Kay W. Axhausen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcmr.2024.100018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comparison of different route choice models for cyclists. The data includes approx. 3,700 cycling trajectories. The network is derived based on the Open-Street-Map that contains street-level attribute information. We estimate two path-based and one link-based models. We present descriptive statistics, model results, resulting indicators, and compare different validation approaches. The results reveal important differences across the models, especially in context of applications and policy-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000093/pdfft?md5=d44160866fe2f6d0f2ebc89dfb44d47f&pid=1-s2.0-S2950105924000093-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了不同的自行车路线选择模型。数据包括约 3,700 条骑行轨迹。该网络基于包含街道级属性信息的开放街道地图(Open-Street-Map)。我们估算了两个基于路径的模型和一个基于链接的模型。我们介绍了描述性统计、模型结果、结果指标,并比较了不同的验证方法。结果显示了不同模型之间的重要差异,尤其是在应用和决策方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of route choice models for cyclists

This paper presents a comparison of different route choice models for cyclists. The data includes approx. 3,700 cycling trajectories. The network is derived based on the Open-Street-Map that contains street-level attribute information. We estimate two path-based and one link-based models. We present descriptive statistics, model results, resulting indicators, and compare different validation approaches. The results reveal important differences across the models, especially in context of applications and policy-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信