髋关节手术中区域麻醉的回顾性分析:临床审计

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
P. Casas Reza, M. Gestal Vázquez, L. Sampayo Rodríguez, A. Vilar Castro, D. López-López, A. García Romar
{"title":"髋关节手术中区域麻醉的回顾性分析:临床审计","authors":"P. Casas Reza,&nbsp;M. Gestal Vázquez,&nbsp;L. Sampayo Rodríguez,&nbsp;A. Vilar Castro,&nbsp;D. López-López,&nbsp;A. García Romar","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2023.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most frequent surgical interventions in the hospital setting. Nonetheless, the ideal method to manage post-operative pain is still unknown. Multimodal analgesia techniques based on regional anaesthesia are amongst the most promising solutions.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty according to whether peripheral nerve block was performed (femoral block, fascia iliaca block and pericapsular nerve group block). Intravenous morphine consumption during the patient's stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit was measured, as well as the number of opioid rescues at 24 and 48h post intervention. As secondary objectives, the prevalence of nerve injury, prolonged quadricipital block, and morphine consumption were established according to other variables of interest.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this observational retrospective study, data was collected from the electronic medical record of 656 traumatological surgery patients from April 2018 to August 2020, with the following inclusion criteria: over 18 years old, ASA I-III, primary total hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia or subarachnoid anaesthesia (only with hyperbaric bupivacaine) and use of levobupivacaine for peripheral nerve block.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 362 patients were selected. The main surgical indication was coxarthrosis (61.3%), followed by hip fracture (22.6%). Peripheral nerve blocks were performed on 169 patients (66.3% femoral, 27.7% PENG, and 6.0% fascia iliaca). Mean postoperative opioid consumption in PACU was lower in patients in who received a PENG (2.2 mg) or a femoral (3.27 mg) block, compared to those who received neither (6.69 mg). There were no differences in opioid rescues at 24 and 48h after the procedure. Nerve injury incidence was low (.8%), and not associated with nerve blocks. The incidence of prolonged quadricipital paralysis was also low (1.3%), and was mainly associated with femoral nerve block (75% of cases).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This retrospective study supports the use of regional blocks as opioid- sparing techniques, highlighting their role in rapid functional recovery with no motor impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis retrospectivo de la anestesia regional en la cirugía de cadera: Auditoría clínica\",\"authors\":\"P. Casas Reza,&nbsp;M. Gestal Vázquez,&nbsp;L. Sampayo Rodríguez,&nbsp;A. Vilar Castro,&nbsp;D. López-López,&nbsp;A. García Romar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.redar.2023.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most frequent surgical interventions in the hospital setting. Nonetheless, the ideal method to manage post-operative pain is still unknown. Multimodal analgesia techniques based on regional anaesthesia are amongst the most promising solutions.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty according to whether peripheral nerve block was performed (femoral block, fascia iliaca block and pericapsular nerve group block). Intravenous morphine consumption during the patient's stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit was measured, as well as the number of opioid rescues at 24 and 48h post intervention. As secondary objectives, the prevalence of nerve injury, prolonged quadricipital block, and morphine consumption were established according to other variables of interest.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this observational retrospective study, data was collected from the electronic medical record of 656 traumatological surgery patients from April 2018 to August 2020, with the following inclusion criteria: over 18 years old, ASA I-III, primary total hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia or subarachnoid anaesthesia (only with hyperbaric bupivacaine) and use of levobupivacaine for peripheral nerve block.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 362 patients were selected. The main surgical indication was coxarthrosis (61.3%), followed by hip fracture (22.6%). Peripheral nerve blocks were performed on 169 patients (66.3% femoral, 27.7% PENG, and 6.0% fascia iliaca). Mean postoperative opioid consumption in PACU was lower in patients in who received a PENG (2.2 mg) or a femoral (3.27 mg) block, compared to those who received neither (6.69 mg). There were no differences in opioid rescues at 24 and 48h after the procedure. Nerve injury incidence was low (.8%), and not associated with nerve blocks. The incidence of prolonged quadricipital paralysis was also low (1.3%), and was mainly associated with femoral nerve block (75% of cases).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This retrospective study supports the use of regional blocks as opioid- sparing techniques, highlighting their role in rapid functional recovery with no motor impairment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935623002839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935623002839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言全髋关节置换术是医院最常见的外科手术之一。然而,控制术后疼痛的理想方法仍是未知数。本研究的目的是根据是否进行了周围神经阻滞(股神经阻滞、髂筋膜阻滞和囊周神经组阻滞)来评估全髋关节置换术后的术后疼痛。研究还测量了患者在麻醉后护理病房的静脉注射吗啡消耗量,以及干预后 24 小时和 48 小时的阿片类药物抢救次数。作为次要目标,还根据其他相关变量确定了神经损伤、四肢阻滞时间延长和吗啡消耗量的发生率。材料和方法在这项观察性回顾研究中,从 2018 年 4 月至 2020 年 8 月期间 656 名创伤外科患者的电子病历中收集了数据,纳入标准如下:18 岁以上,ASA I-III 级,在全身麻醉或蛛网膜下腔麻醉(仅使用高压布比卡因)下进行初级全髋关节置换术,使用左旋布比卡因进行周围神经阻滞。主要手术适应症是髋关节病(61.3%),其次是髋部骨折(22.6%)。169名患者接受了周围神经阻滞(股神经占66.3%,PENG神经占27.7%,髂筋膜神经占6.0%)。接受PENG(2.2毫克)或股神经(3.27毫克)阻滞的患者术后在PACU的阿片类药物平均消耗量低于未接受阻滞的患者(6.69毫克)。术后24小时和48小时的阿片类药物抢救时间没有差异。神经损伤发生率较低(0.8%),与神经阻滞无关。结论这项回顾性研究支持使用区域阻滞作为阿片类药物稀释技术,强调了其在快速功能恢复和无运动障碍方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Análisis retrospectivo de la anestesia regional en la cirugía de cadera: Auditoría clínica

Análisis retrospectivo de la anestesia regional en la cirugía de cadera: Auditoría clínica

Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most frequent surgical interventions in the hospital setting. Nonetheless, the ideal method to manage post-operative pain is still unknown. Multimodal analgesia techniques based on regional anaesthesia are amongst the most promising solutions.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty according to whether peripheral nerve block was performed (femoral block, fascia iliaca block and pericapsular nerve group block). Intravenous morphine consumption during the patient's stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit was measured, as well as the number of opioid rescues at 24 and 48h post intervention. As secondary objectives, the prevalence of nerve injury, prolonged quadricipital block, and morphine consumption were established according to other variables of interest.

Materials and methods

In this observational retrospective study, data was collected from the electronic medical record of 656 traumatological surgery patients from April 2018 to August 2020, with the following inclusion criteria: over 18 years old, ASA I-III, primary total hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia or subarachnoid anaesthesia (only with hyperbaric bupivacaine) and use of levobupivacaine for peripheral nerve block.

Results

A total of 362 patients were selected. The main surgical indication was coxarthrosis (61.3%), followed by hip fracture (22.6%). Peripheral nerve blocks were performed on 169 patients (66.3% femoral, 27.7% PENG, and 6.0% fascia iliaca). Mean postoperative opioid consumption in PACU was lower in patients in who received a PENG (2.2 mg) or a femoral (3.27 mg) block, compared to those who received neither (6.69 mg). There were no differences in opioid rescues at 24 and 48h after the procedure. Nerve injury incidence was low (.8%), and not associated with nerve blocks. The incidence of prolonged quadricipital paralysis was also low (1.3%), and was mainly associated with femoral nerve block (75% of cases).

Conclusions

This retrospective study supports the use of regional blocks as opioid- sparing techniques, highlighting their role in rapid functional recovery with no motor impairment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
113
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信