股静脉支架植入术与髂股静脉支架植入术辅助治疗广泛的慢性髂股静脉阻塞。

Phlebology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1177/02683555241236824
Mohammed Alsagheer Alhewy, Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelhafez, Mohammed Hamza Metwally, Ehab Abd Elmoneim Ghazala, Alhussein M Khedr, Ahmed Atef Khamis, Hassan Gado, Wael Abdo Abdo Abd-Elgawad, Abdullah El Sayed, Abdelhalim A Abdelmohsen
{"title":"股静脉支架植入术与髂股静脉支架植入术辅助治疗广泛的慢性髂股静脉阻塞。","authors":"Mohammed Alsagheer Alhewy, Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelhafez, Mohammed Hamza Metwally, Ehab Abd Elmoneim Ghazala, Alhussein M Khedr, Ahmed Atef Khamis, Hassan Gado, Wael Abdo Abdo Abd-Elgawad, Abdullah El Sayed, Abdelhalim A Abdelmohsen","doi":"10.1177/02683555241236824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare femoral endovenectomy with the creation of an arteriovenous fistula (FE + AVF), versus iliofemoral endovenous stenting with the concurrent extended femoral vein (FV-S) stenting in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (IFVO).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a randomized prospective single-center study, 48 received (FV-S), while the other 54 had (FE + AVF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the two groups (FV-S) and (FE + AVF) (59% vs 56.8%, 75% vs 79.1%, respectively). At a median of 13 months after the treatment. However, the FV-S group's patients experienced fewer postoperative problems (<i>p</i> = .012), shorter procedures (<i>p</i> = .001), and shorter stays in the hospital (<i>p</i> = .025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no difference between the efficacy and symptomatic resolution of the FV-S group and the FE + AVF group at the same time, FV-S has lower postoperative complications and a shorter procedure duration and hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"393-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Femoral vein stenting versus endovenectomy as adjuncts to iliofemoral venous stenting in extensive chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Alsagheer Alhewy, Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelhafez, Mohammed Hamza Metwally, Ehab Abd Elmoneim Ghazala, Alhussein M Khedr, Ahmed Atef Khamis, Hassan Gado, Wael Abdo Abdo Abd-Elgawad, Abdullah El Sayed, Abdelhalim A Abdelmohsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555241236824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare femoral endovenectomy with the creation of an arteriovenous fistula (FE + AVF), versus iliofemoral endovenous stenting with the concurrent extended femoral vein (FV-S) stenting in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (IFVO).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a randomized prospective single-center study, 48 received (FV-S), while the other 54 had (FE + AVF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the two groups (FV-S) and (FE + AVF) (59% vs 56.8%, 75% vs 79.1%, respectively). At a median of 13 months after the treatment. However, the FV-S group's patients experienced fewer postoperative problems (<i>p</i> = .012), shorter procedures (<i>p</i> = .001), and shorter stays in the hospital (<i>p</i> = .025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no difference between the efficacy and symptomatic resolution of the FV-S group and the FE + AVF group at the same time, FV-S has lower postoperative complications and a shorter procedure duration and hospital stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"393-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241236824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241236824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在慢性髂股静脉阻塞(IFVO)患者中,比较股内膜切除术与动静脉瘘(FE + AVF),以及髂股内膜支架植入术与同时股静脉延长支架植入术(FV-S):在一项随机前瞻性单中心研究中,48名患者接受了(FV-S),另外54名患者接受了(FE + AVF):结果:(FV-S)和(FE + AVF)两组的主要结果无明显统计学差异(分别为 59% vs 56.8%、75% vs 79.1%)。治疗后中位数为 13 个月。然而,FV-S 组患者的术后问题更少(p = .012),手术时间更短(p = .001),住院时间更短(p = .025):结论:FV-S 组与 FE + AVF 组在疗效和症状缓解方面没有差异,同时 FV-S 组术后并发症较少,手术时间和住院时间较短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Femoral vein stenting versus endovenectomy as adjuncts to iliofemoral venous stenting in extensive chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

Purpose: To compare femoral endovenectomy with the creation of an arteriovenous fistula (FE + AVF), versus iliofemoral endovenous stenting with the concurrent extended femoral vein (FV-S) stenting in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (IFVO).

Materials and methods: In a randomized prospective single-center study, 48 received (FV-S), while the other 54 had (FE + AVF).

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the two groups (FV-S) and (FE + AVF) (59% vs 56.8%, 75% vs 79.1%, respectively). At a median of 13 months after the treatment. However, the FV-S group's patients experienced fewer postoperative problems (p = .012), shorter procedures (p = .001), and shorter stays in the hospital (p = .025).

Conclusion: There is no difference between the efficacy and symptomatic resolution of the FV-S group and the FE + AVF group at the same time, FV-S has lower postoperative complications and a shorter procedure duration and hospital stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信