人工智能(AI)系统在中等收入国家机会性筛查和诊断人群中的应用。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Marlina Tanty Ramli Hamid, Nazimah Ab Mumin, Shamsiah Abdul Hamid, Kartini Rahmat
{"title":"人工智能(AI)系统在中等收入国家机会性筛查和诊断人群中的应用。","authors":"Marlina Tanty Ramli Hamid, Nazimah Ab Mumin, Shamsiah Abdul Hamid, Kartini Rahmat","doi":"10.2174/0115734056280191231207052903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in mammography in a diverse population from a middle-income nation and compares it to traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 543 mammograms of 467 Malays, 48 Chinese, and 28 Indians in a middle-income nation. Three breast radiologists interpreted the examinations independently in two reading sessions (with and without AI support). Breast density and BI-RADS categories were assessed, comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 543 mammograms, 69.2% had lesions detected. Biopsies were performed on 25%(n=136), with 66(48.5%) benign and 70(51.5%) malignant. Substantial agreement in density assessment between the radiologist and AI software (κ =0.606, p < 0.001) and the BI-RADS category with and without AI (κ =0.74, p < 0.001). The performance of the AI software was comparable to the traditional methods. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV or radiologists alone, radiologist + AI, and AI alone were 81.9%,90.4%,56.0%, and 97.1%; 81.0%, 93.1%,55.5%, and 97.0%; and 90.0%,76.5%,36.2%, and 98.1%, respectively. AI software enhances the accuracy of lesion diagnosis and reduces unnecessary biopsies, particularly for BI-RADS 4 lesions. The AI software results for synthetic were almost similar to the original 2D mammography, with AUC of 0.925 and 0.871, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI software may assist in the accurate diagnosis of breast lesions, enhancing the efficiency of breast lesion diagnosis in a mixed population of opportunistic screening and diagnostic patients.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>• The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in mammography for population-based breast cancer screening has been validated in high-income nations, with reported improved diagnostic performance. Our study evaluated the usage of an AI tool in an opportunistic screening setting in a multi-ethnic and middle-income nation. • The application of AI in mammography enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially leading to reduced unnecessary biopsies. • AI integration into the workflow did not disrupt the performance of trained breast radiologists, as there is a substantial inter-reader agreement for BI-RADS category assessment and breast density.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) System in Opportunistic Screening and Diagnostic Population in a Middle-income Nation.\",\"authors\":\"Marlina Tanty Ramli Hamid, Nazimah Ab Mumin, Shamsiah Abdul Hamid, Kartini Rahmat\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056280191231207052903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in mammography in a diverse population from a middle-income nation and compares it to traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 543 mammograms of 467 Malays, 48 Chinese, and 28 Indians in a middle-income nation. Three breast radiologists interpreted the examinations independently in two reading sessions (with and without AI support). Breast density and BI-RADS categories were assessed, comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 543 mammograms, 69.2% had lesions detected. Biopsies were performed on 25%(n=136), with 66(48.5%) benign and 70(51.5%) malignant. Substantial agreement in density assessment between the radiologist and AI software (κ =0.606, p < 0.001) and the BI-RADS category with and without AI (κ =0.74, p < 0.001). The performance of the AI software was comparable to the traditional methods. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV or radiologists alone, radiologist + AI, and AI alone were 81.9%,90.4%,56.0%, and 97.1%; 81.0%, 93.1%,55.5%, and 97.0%; and 90.0%,76.5%,36.2%, and 98.1%, respectively. AI software enhances the accuracy of lesion diagnosis and reduces unnecessary biopsies, particularly for BI-RADS 4 lesions. The AI software results for synthetic were almost similar to the original 2D mammography, with AUC of 0.925 and 0.871, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI software may assist in the accurate diagnosis of breast lesions, enhancing the efficiency of breast lesion diagnosis in a mixed population of opportunistic screening and diagnostic patients.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>• The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in mammography for population-based breast cancer screening has been validated in high-income nations, with reported improved diagnostic performance. Our study evaluated the usage of an AI tool in an opportunistic screening setting in a multi-ethnic and middle-income nation. • The application of AI in mammography enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially leading to reduced unnecessary biopsies. • AI integration into the workflow did not disrupt the performance of trained breast radiologists, as there is a substantial inter-reader agreement for BI-RADS category assessment and breast density.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056280191231207052903\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056280191231207052903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究评估了人工智能(AI)在一个中等收入国家的不同人群中应用于乳房 X 射线照相术的效果,并将其与传统方法进行了比较:本研究对一个中等收入国家的 467 名马来人、48 名中国人和 28 名印度人的 543 张乳房 X 光照片进行了回顾性研究。三位乳腺放射科医生在两次阅片过程中(有人工智能支持和没有人工智能支持)对检查结果进行了独立判读。评估了乳腺密度和 BI-RADS 类别,比较了准确性、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV) 结果:在 543 张乳房 X 光照片中,69.2% 发现了病变。25%(n=136)的患者进行了活组织检查,其中66例(48.5%)为良性,70例(51.5%)为恶性。放射科医生与人工智能软件(κ =0.606,p < 0.001)以及有无人工智能的 BI-RADS 类别(κ =0.74,p < 0.001)之间的密度评估结果基本一致。人工智能软件的性能与传统方法相当。单独放射科医生、放射科医生+人工智能和单独人工智能的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 81.9%、90.4%、56.0% 和 97.1%;81.0%、93.1%、55.5% 和 97.0%;90.0%、76.5%、36.2% 和 98.1%。人工智能软件提高了病变诊断的准确性,减少了不必要的活检,尤其是对 BI-RADS 4 病变的诊断。人工智能软件的合成结果与原始的二维乳腺X光检查结果几乎相似,AUC分别为0.925和0.871:人工智能软件可帮助准确诊断乳腺病变,提高机会性筛查和诊断患者混合人群的乳腺病变诊断效率:- 人工智能(AI)在乳腺放射摄影中的应用已在高收入国家的人群乳腺癌筛查中得到验证,据报道诊断效果有所改善。我们的研究评估了人工智能工具在多民族中等收入国家机会性筛查中的使用情况。- 将人工智能应用于乳腺 X 射线照相术可提高诊断准确性,从而减少不必要的活检。- 将人工智能整合到工作流程中并不会影响训练有素的乳腺放射医师的工作表现,因为阅片人员之间在 BI-RADS 类别评估和乳腺密度方面存在很大的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) System in Opportunistic Screening and Diagnostic Population in a Middle-income Nation.

Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in mammography in a diverse population from a middle-income nation and compares it to traditional methods.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 543 mammograms of 467 Malays, 48 Chinese, and 28 Indians in a middle-income nation. Three breast radiologists interpreted the examinations independently in two reading sessions (with and without AI support). Breast density and BI-RADS categories were assessed, comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) results.

Results: Of 543 mammograms, 69.2% had lesions detected. Biopsies were performed on 25%(n=136), with 66(48.5%) benign and 70(51.5%) malignant. Substantial agreement in density assessment between the radiologist and AI software (κ =0.606, p < 0.001) and the BI-RADS category with and without AI (κ =0.74, p < 0.001). The performance of the AI software was comparable to the traditional methods. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV or radiologists alone, radiologist + AI, and AI alone were 81.9%,90.4%,56.0%, and 97.1%; 81.0%, 93.1%,55.5%, and 97.0%; and 90.0%,76.5%,36.2%, and 98.1%, respectively. AI software enhances the accuracy of lesion diagnosis and reduces unnecessary biopsies, particularly for BI-RADS 4 lesions. The AI software results for synthetic were almost similar to the original 2D mammography, with AUC of 0.925 and 0.871, respectively.

Conclusion: AI software may assist in the accurate diagnosis of breast lesions, enhancing the efficiency of breast lesion diagnosis in a mixed population of opportunistic screening and diagnostic patients.

Key messages: • The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in mammography for population-based breast cancer screening has been validated in high-income nations, with reported improved diagnostic performance. Our study evaluated the usage of an AI tool in an opportunistic screening setting in a multi-ethnic and middle-income nation. • The application of AI in mammography enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially leading to reduced unnecessary biopsies. • AI integration into the workflow did not disrupt the performance of trained breast radiologists, as there is a substantial inter-reader agreement for BI-RADS category assessment and breast density.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信