德国德尔塔变异期 COVID-19 的病程和肺部受累情况:一家三甲医院接种疫苗和未接种疫苗患者的比较研究。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Andrea Steuwe, Alexandra Ljimani, Marcel Andree, Tobias Wienemann, Nadine Lübke, Andreas Walker, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, The Racoon Study Group, Karl Ludger Radke, Gerald Antoch, Birte Valentin
{"title":"德国德尔塔变异期 COVID-19 的病程和肺部受累情况:一家三甲医院接种疫苗和未接种疫苗患者的比较研究。","authors":"Andrea Steuwe, Alexandra Ljimani, Marcel Andree, Tobias Wienemann, Nadine Lübke, Andreas Walker, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, The Racoon Study Group, Karl Ludger Radke, Gerald Antoch, Birte Valentin","doi":"10.2174/0115734056282920231212104602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Background: Despite the availability of vaccines, there is an increasing number of SARS-CoV-2-breakthrough-infections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a radiological difference in lung parenchymal involvement between infected vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Additionally, we aimed to investigate whether vaccination has an impact on the course of illness and the need for intensive care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes all patients undergoing chest computed tomography (CT) or x-ray imaging in case of a proven SARS-CoV-2 infection between September and November 2021. Anonymized CT and x-ray images were reviewed retrospectively and in consensus by two radiologists, applying an internal severity score scheme for CT and x-ray as well as CARE and BRIXIA scores for x-ray. Radiological findings were compared to vaccination status, comorbidities, inpatient course of the patient's illness and the subjective onset of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 38 patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent a CT scan, and 168 patients underwent an x-ray examination during the study period. Of these, 32% were vaccinated in the CT group, and 45% in the x-ray group. For the latter, vaccinated patients exhibited significantly more comorbidities (cardiovascular (p=0.002), haemato-oncological diseases (p=0.016), immunosuppression (p=0.004)), and a higher age (p<0.001). Vaccinated groups showed significantly lower extent of lung involvement (severity scores in CT cohort and x-ray cohort both p≤0.020; ARDS 42% in unvaccinated CT cohort vs. 8% in vaccinated CT cohort). Furthermore, vaccinated patients in the CT cohort had significantly less need for intensive care treatment (p=0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that vaccination, in the case of breakthrough infection, favours a milder course of illness concerning lung parenchymal involvement and the need for intensive care, despite negative predictors, such as immunosuppression or other pre-existing conditions.</p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease Course and Pulmonary Involvement of COVID-19 during the Delta Variant Period in Germany: A Comparative Study of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients at a Tertiary Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Steuwe, Alexandra Ljimani, Marcel Andree, Tobias Wienemann, Nadine Lübke, Andreas Walker, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, The Racoon Study Group, Karl Ludger Radke, Gerald Antoch, Birte Valentin\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056282920231212104602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><p>Background: Despite the availability of vaccines, there is an increasing number of SARS-CoV-2-breakthrough-infections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a radiological difference in lung parenchymal involvement between infected vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Additionally, we aimed to investigate whether vaccination has an impact on the course of illness and the need for intensive care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes all patients undergoing chest computed tomography (CT) or x-ray imaging in case of a proven SARS-CoV-2 infection between September and November 2021. Anonymized CT and x-ray images were reviewed retrospectively and in consensus by two radiologists, applying an internal severity score scheme for CT and x-ray as well as CARE and BRIXIA scores for x-ray. Radiological findings were compared to vaccination status, comorbidities, inpatient course of the patient's illness and the subjective onset of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 38 patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent a CT scan, and 168 patients underwent an x-ray examination during the study period. Of these, 32% were vaccinated in the CT group, and 45% in the x-ray group. For the latter, vaccinated patients exhibited significantly more comorbidities (cardiovascular (p=0.002), haemato-oncological diseases (p=0.016), immunosuppression (p=0.004)), and a higher age (p<0.001). Vaccinated groups showed significantly lower extent of lung involvement (severity scores in CT cohort and x-ray cohort both p≤0.020; ARDS 42% in unvaccinated CT cohort vs. 8% in vaccinated CT cohort). Furthermore, vaccinated patients in the CT cohort had significantly less need for intensive care treatment (p=0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that vaccination, in the case of breakthrough infection, favours a milder course of illness concerning lung parenchymal involvement and the need for intensive care, despite negative predictors, such as immunosuppression or other pre-existing conditions.</p>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056282920231212104602\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056282920231212104602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有疫苗可用,但 SARS-CoV-2 突发性感染的数量却在不断增加:尽管有疫苗可用,但 SARS-CoV-2 突破性感染的数量却在不断增加:本研究旨在确定已接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的受感染患者的肺实质受累情况在放射学上是否存在差异。此外,我们还旨在调查接种疫苗是否会对病程和重症监护需求产生影响:本研究包括 2021 年 9 月至 11 月期间所有接受胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)或 X 光成像检查的经证实感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者。由两名放射科医生对匿名 CT 和 X 光图像进行回顾性审查,并达成共识,对 CT 和 X 光采用内部严重程度评分标准,对 X 光采用 CARE 和 BRIXIA 评分标准。将放射学检查结果与疫苗接种情况、合并症、住院病人的病程以及主观发病时间进行比较:研究期间,共有 38 名急性 SARS-CoV-2 感染者接受了 CT 扫描,168 名患者接受了 X 光检查。其中,32%的 CT 组患者接种了疫苗,45%的 X 光组患者接种了疫苗。就后者而言,接种疫苗的患者有更多的合并症(心血管疾病(P=0.002)、血液肿瘤疾病(P=0.016)、免疫抑制(P=0.004)),而且年龄更大(P 结论:我们的数据表明,在接种疫苗后,患者的心血管疾病、血液肿瘤疾病和免疫抑制的发病率都会明显降低:我们的数据表明,在突破性感染的情况下,尽管存在免疫抑制或其他原有病症等负面预测因素,但接种疫苗有利于减轻肺实质受累和需要重症监护的病程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disease Course and Pulmonary Involvement of COVID-19 during the Delta Variant Period in Germany: A Comparative Study of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients at a Tertiary Hospital.

Background: Despite the availability of vaccines, there is an increasing number of SARS-CoV-2-breakthrough-infections.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a radiological difference in lung parenchymal involvement between infected vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Additionally, we aimed to investigate whether vaccination has an impact on the course of illness and the need for intensive care.

Methods: This study includes all patients undergoing chest computed tomography (CT) or x-ray imaging in case of a proven SARS-CoV-2 infection between September and November 2021. Anonymized CT and x-ray images were reviewed retrospectively and in consensus by two radiologists, applying an internal severity score scheme for CT and x-ray as well as CARE and BRIXIA scores for x-ray. Radiological findings were compared to vaccination status, comorbidities, inpatient course of the patient's illness and the subjective onset of symptoms.

Results: In total, 38 patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent a CT scan, and 168 patients underwent an x-ray examination during the study period. Of these, 32% were vaccinated in the CT group, and 45% in the x-ray group. For the latter, vaccinated patients exhibited significantly more comorbidities (cardiovascular (p=0.002), haemato-oncological diseases (p=0.016), immunosuppression (p=0.004)), and a higher age (p<0.001). Vaccinated groups showed significantly lower extent of lung involvement (severity scores in CT cohort and x-ray cohort both p≤0.020; ARDS 42% in unvaccinated CT cohort vs. 8% in vaccinated CT cohort). Furthermore, vaccinated patients in the CT cohort had significantly less need for intensive care treatment (p=0.040).

Conclusion: Our data suggest that vaccination, in the case of breakthrough infection, favours a milder course of illness concerning lung parenchymal involvement and the need for intensive care, despite negative predictors, such as immunosuppression or other pre-existing conditions.

.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信