通过肌功能疗法评估和康复阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的舌头运动技能:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
William Poncin, Ambre Willemsens, Lucile Gely, Olivier Contal
{"title":"通过肌功能疗法评估和康复阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的舌头运动技能:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"William Poncin, Ambre Willemsens, Lucile Gely, Olivier Contal","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The first objective of this study was to compare tongue motor skills between patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and healthy participants. Second, the effect of oropharyngeal myofunctional therapy (MFT) on the tongue muscular qualities of patients with OSA was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in 5 electronic databases up to July 2023. Risk of bias was assessed via the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal checklist for cross-sectional studies (aim number 1) and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for randomized controlled trials (aim number 2). Pooled standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies including 520 adults and one study including 92 children addressed aim number 1. Compared to healthy adults, individuals with OSA had no significant difference in tongue protrusion strength (9 studies, n = 366; standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval], -0.00 [-0.45, 0.44]) or endurance (5 studies, n = 125; 0.31 [-0.26, 0.88]) but presented a lower tongue elevation strength (6 studies, n = 243; 1.00 [0.47, 1.53]) and elevation endurance (3 studies, n = 98; 0.52 [0.11, 0.94]). In children, tongue elevation strength was lower but elevation endurance was higher in those with OSA than in healthy children. Two randomized controlled trials (28 adults, 54 children) addressed aim number 2 and were of poor methodological quality. In these studies, myofunctional therapy improved tongue motor skills in patients with OSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tongue elevation motor skills are decreased in adults with OSA, whereas tongue protrusion motor skills seem preserved. Very few data are available in children. There are also too few data about the impact of myofunctional therapy on tongue motor skills.</p><p><strong>Citation: </strong>Poncin W, Willemsens A, Gely L, Contal O. Assessment and rehabilitation of tongue motor skills with myofunctional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>J Clin Sleep Med</i>. 2024;20(9):1535-1549.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment and rehabilitation of tongue motor skills with myofunctional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"William Poncin, Ambre Willemsens, Lucile Gely, Olivier Contal\",\"doi\":\"10.5664/jcsm.11074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The first objective of this study was to compare tongue motor skills between patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and healthy participants. Second, the effect of oropharyngeal myofunctional therapy (MFT) on the tongue muscular qualities of patients with OSA was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in 5 electronic databases up to July 2023. Risk of bias was assessed via the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal checklist for cross-sectional studies (aim number 1) and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for randomized controlled trials (aim number 2). Pooled standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies including 520 adults and one study including 92 children addressed aim number 1. Compared to healthy adults, individuals with OSA had no significant difference in tongue protrusion strength (9 studies, n = 366; standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval], -0.00 [-0.45, 0.44]) or endurance (5 studies, n = 125; 0.31 [-0.26, 0.88]) but presented a lower tongue elevation strength (6 studies, n = 243; 1.00 [0.47, 1.53]) and elevation endurance (3 studies, n = 98; 0.52 [0.11, 0.94]). In children, tongue elevation strength was lower but elevation endurance was higher in those with OSA than in healthy children. Two randomized controlled trials (28 adults, 54 children) addressed aim number 2 and were of poor methodological quality. In these studies, myofunctional therapy improved tongue motor skills in patients with OSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tongue elevation motor skills are decreased in adults with OSA, whereas tongue protrusion motor skills seem preserved. Very few data are available in children. There are also too few data about the impact of myofunctional therapy on tongue motor skills.</p><p><strong>Citation: </strong>Poncin W, Willemsens A, Gely L, Contal O. Assessment and rehabilitation of tongue motor skills with myofunctional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>J Clin Sleep Med</i>. 2024;20(9):1535-1549.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:第一个目的是比较阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者和健康人的舌头运动技能。其次,评估口咽肌功能疗法(MFT)对 OSA 患者舌头肌肉质量的影响:方法:在五个电子数据库中进行检索,检索期至 2023 年 7 月。对横断面研究采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所评估清单(目标1),对随机对照试验采用PEDro量表(目标2),对偏倚风险进行评估。采用随机效应模型计算汇总标准化均值差异(SMD)和 95% 置信区间:13项研究(包括520名成人)和1项研究(包括92名儿童)讨论了目标1。与健康成人相比,OSA 患者的舌前伸强度(9 项研究,n=366,SMD [95%CI];-0.00 [-0.45, 0.44])或耐力(5 项研究,n=125;0.31 [-0.26, 0.88])无显著差异,但舌上抬强度(6 项研究,n=243;1.00 [0.47, 1.53])和上抬耐力(3 项研究,n=98;0.52 [0.11, 0.94])较低。在儿科研究中,与健康儿童相比,患有 OSA 的儿童的舌头抬高强度较低,但抬高耐力较高。两项随机对照试验(28 名成人,54 名儿童)涉及目标 2,方法质量较差。在这些研究中,MFT 提高了 OSA 患者的舌头运动技能:结论:成人 OSA 患者的舌头上抬运动能力下降,而舌头前伸运动能力似乎保持不变。儿童方面的数据很少。关于肌功能疗法对舌头运动技能影响的数据也太少:系统综述注册:Prospero 注册号:CRD42022307148。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment and rehabilitation of tongue motor skills with myofunctional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study objectives: The first objective of this study was to compare tongue motor skills between patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and healthy participants. Second, the effect of oropharyngeal myofunctional therapy (MFT) on the tongue muscular qualities of patients with OSA was evaluated.

Methods: Searches were conducted in 5 electronic databases up to July 2023. Risk of bias was assessed via the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal checklist for cross-sectional studies (aim number 1) and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for randomized controlled trials (aim number 2). Pooled standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results: Thirteen studies including 520 adults and one study including 92 children addressed aim number 1. Compared to healthy adults, individuals with OSA had no significant difference in tongue protrusion strength (9 studies, n = 366; standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval], -0.00 [-0.45, 0.44]) or endurance (5 studies, n = 125; 0.31 [-0.26, 0.88]) but presented a lower tongue elevation strength (6 studies, n = 243; 1.00 [0.47, 1.53]) and elevation endurance (3 studies, n = 98; 0.52 [0.11, 0.94]). In children, tongue elevation strength was lower but elevation endurance was higher in those with OSA than in healthy children. Two randomized controlled trials (28 adults, 54 children) addressed aim number 2 and were of poor methodological quality. In these studies, myofunctional therapy improved tongue motor skills in patients with OSA.

Conclusions: Tongue elevation motor skills are decreased in adults with OSA, whereas tongue protrusion motor skills seem preserved. Very few data are available in children. There are also too few data about the impact of myofunctional therapy on tongue motor skills.

Citation: Poncin W, Willemsens A, Gely L, Contal O. Assessment and rehabilitation of tongue motor skills with myofunctional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(9):1535-1549.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信